Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design
Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design Analysis Techniques For Man-Machine Systems Design
NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/7Volume 2AdvantagesSAINT was developed specifically for simulatingmanned systems. Some users have found that itsadoption forces the project team to carry out a thoroughtask analysis, thereby improving the level ofapplication of human engineering and the understandingof human factors problems.It can be used to identify critical features of systemperformance prior to hardware being available for manin-the-looptesting. The results are readily accepted byother project personnel. By using user-wriatenprogramme modules, the output can be madecompatible with statistical packages such as GPSS,SYSTAT, or LOTUS 1-2-3.DisadvantagesSAINT is not very easy to use. The programme"interface" requires knowledgeable users. and they find thedocumentation difficult to use. Some published versionsof the code have included errors, which users have had toidentify and correcLThe commercial versions such as MicroSAINT are easierto use, but are limited in their capability to run largenetworks, and their use of dynamic state variables. Theydo not have all the features of the full SAINT program.They do not include an interface to a programminglanguage, but use a reduced set of FORTRAN, so theycannot represent complex logic.Relative contributionSome users rate the technique as making a relatively high contribution One user expressed concern about the cost oflearning and familiarization, compared with the results obtained.ApplicationsSAINT and MicroSAINT have been used in a number of projects in the Canada, France, F.R.G., The Netherlands,U.K. and USA (see references). Applications have included destroyer combat systems, the study of pilot behaviourduring an instrument approach to an airport, the comparison of different submarine control systems, remotely pilotedvehicles (RPV) and surface-to-air (SAM) missile systems.Quality assurance considerationsThe technique lends itself to sensitivity analysis. This has been conducted on some projects, although no suchactivity has been reported in the literature.Relationship to system performance requirementsThe output of a SAINT simulation can usually be related directly to system performance requirements in terms of thedistribution of times required for the completion of a series of tasks, or the probability of completion of those tasks.References and Bibilography1. Cherry, W.P., & Evans, S. (1989). Use of crew performance models and the development of complementarymathematical techniques to promote efficient use of analytic resources. In: G.R. McMillan, D. Beevis, E. Salas,M.H. Strub, R. Sutton, & L. van Breda (Eds.), Applications of human lerformance models to system design.(pp. 285-311). New York: Plenum Press. Defense Research Series, Volume 2.NATO UNCLASSIFIED-98 -
NATO UNCLASSIFIED- 99 - AC/243(Panel-8)TR/7Volume 22. Chubb, G.P. & Hoyland. C.M. (1989). Systematic modeling of multi-operator systems to evaluate designconcepts. In: G..R. McMillan, D. Beevis, E. Salas, M.H. Strub, R. Sutton, & L. van Breda (Eds.). Applicationsof human nerformance models to system design, (pp. 295-311). New York: Plenum Press. Defense ResearchSeries, Volume 2.3. Chubb, G.P., Laughery, K.R. Jr.. & Pritsker, A.A.B. (1987). Simulating manned systems. In: G. Salvendy(Ed.) Handbook of human factors. New York: John Wiley & Sons.4. Kraiss, K.E. (1981) A display design and evaluation study using task network models. IEEE Transactions onSystems Science and Cybernetics 11 (5), 339-351.5. Kraiss, KE., Schubert, E., and Widdel, H. (1983). Untersuchungen zur manuellen Lenkung von U-booten.Wachtberg-WerthOven, F.R.G.: Forschungsinstitut fur Anthropotechnik.6. Mills. R. (1988). The user-assisted GENeric Systems Analyst Workstation (GENSAW): Summary. Presentationto NATO AC/243 Panel-8/RSG.9,Wright-Panerson Air Force Base, Ohio: Aerospace Medical ResearchLaboratory.7. Pritsker, A.A.B. (1986). Introduction to simulation and SLAM II (Third edition). West Lafayette, Indiana:Systems Publishing Corp.8. Siegel, A.I., and Wolf, JJ. (1961). A technique for evaluating man-machine system designs. Human Factors 3.(1), 18-25.9. van Breda, L. (1989). Analysis of a procedure for multiple operator task performance on submarines using anetwork model. In: G.R. McMillan, D. Beevis, E. Salas, M.H. Strub, R. Sutton, & L. van Breda (Eds.),Applications of human performance models to system design, (pp. 231-242). New York: Plenum Press. DefenseResearch Series, Volume 2.10. Wortman, D.B., Duket, D.D., & Leifert, DJ. (!976). SAINT simulation of a remotely piloted vehicle/dronecontrol facility: Model development and analysis. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: Aerospace MedicalResearch Laboratory.NATO UNCLASSIFIED99-
- Page 162 and 163: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8')TR
- Page 164 and 165: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 166 and 167: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 168 and 169: NATO UNCLASSIFTEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 170 and 171: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 172 and 173: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8 TR/
- Page 174 and 175: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/24 3 (6PanelVol
- Page 176 and 177: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 178 and 179: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8'tTR
- Page 180 and 181: N ATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8')T
- Page 182 and 183: NATO UNCLASShi Ih I t LUAC/243(Pane
- Page 184 and 185: NATO UNCLASSIFIED,AC/243(Panel 8 TR
- Page 186 and 187: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 188 and 189: NATO UNCLASSIFTEDAC/243(Panel 8')TR
- Page 190 and 191: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8')TR
- Page 192 and 193: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 194 and 195: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 196 and 197: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8')TR
- Page 198 and 199: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8ITR/
- Page 200 and 201: NATO UNCLASSIFIUEUAC/243(Panel 8)TR
- Page 202 and 203: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 204 and 205: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 206 and 207: t NATO UNCLASSIFlEDAC/243(Panel 8)T
- Page 208 and 209: NATO UNoCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR
- Page 210 and 211: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 214 and 215: NATO UN CL A S SIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8
- Page 216 and 217: NATO UNCLAS.SIFI.EDAC/243(Panei 8Vo
- Page 218 and 219: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 220 and 221: fl1106AC/243(Panel 8'TR/7- 106Volum
- Page 222 and 223: NATO UNCLASSIFIED -AC/243(Panel 8)T
- Page 224 and 225: .N AI U N C L A Itt110iAC/243(Panel
- Page 226 and 227: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 228 and 229: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 230 and 231: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 232 and 233: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 234 and 235: ] NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)T
- Page 236 and 237: VNATO UNCLASSIFIED;-AC/243(Panel 8'
- Page 238 and 239: NATO UNCLASSIFIED1111wAC/243(Panel
- Page 240 and 241: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR/
- Page 242 and 243: NATO UNCLASSIFIEDAC/ 24 3 (Pane l 8
- Page 244 and 245: NATo I UNCLASSIFEDAC/243(Panel 8'IT
- Page 246 and 247: NATO ITNCLASSIUI:EDAC/243(panel 81T
- Page 248 and 249: NATO U.NCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8)TR
- Page 250 and 251: NATO INCLASSIFIEDAC/243(Panel- 8LTR
- Page 252 and 253: NATO I rNC'LASSTFIEDAC/243(Panel 82
- Page 254 and 255: NATONTCLaSSIFIEDAC/243(Panel 8\TR/7
- Page 256 and 257: NATO UNCLASSIiE:DAC/243(Panel 8Y1TR
- Page 258 and 259: o ndesel pre-lubrication (D)compres
- Page 260 and 261: NATO I rNCT-AS S ITfEDAC/243(Panel
NATO UNCLASSIFIED- 99 - AC/243(Panel-8)TR/7Volume 22. Chubb, G.P. & Hoyland. C.M. (1989). Systematic modeling of multi-operator systems to evaluate designconcepts. In: G..R. McMillan, D. Beevis, E. Salas, M.H. Strub, R. Sutton, & L. van Breda (Eds.). Applicationsof human nerformance models to system design, (pp. 295-311). New York: Plenum Press. Defense ResearchSeries, Volume 2.3. Chubb, G.P., Laughery, K.R. Jr.. & Pritsker, A.A.B. (1987). Simulating manned systems. In: G. Salvendy(Ed.) Handbook of human factors. New York: John Wiley & Sons.4. Kraiss, K.E. (1981) A display design and evaluation study using task network models. IEEE Transactions on<strong>Systems</strong> Science and Cybernetics 11 (5), 339-351.5. Kraiss, KE., Schubert, E., and Widdel, H. (1983). Untersuchungen zur manuellen Lenkung von U-booten.Wachtberg-WerthOven, F.R.G.: <strong>For</strong>schungsinstitut fur Anthropotechnik.6. Mills. R. (1988). The user-assisted GENeric <strong>Systems</strong> Analyst Workstation (GENSAW): Summary. Presentationto NATO AC/243 Panel-8/RSG.9,Wright-Panerson Air <strong>For</strong>ce Base, Ohio: Aerospace Medical ResearchLaboratory.7. Pritsker, A.A.B. (1986). Introduction to simulation and SLAM II (Third edition). West Lafayette, Indiana:<strong>Systems</strong> Publishing Corp.8. Siegel, A.I., and Wolf, JJ. (1961). A technique for evaluating man-machine system designs. Human Factors 3.(1), 18-25.9. van Breda, L. (1989). <strong>Analysis</strong> of a procedure for multiple operator task performance on submarines using anetwork model. In: G.R. McMillan, D. Beevis, E. Salas, M.H. Strub, R. Sutton, & L. van Breda (Eds.),Applications of human performance models to system design, (pp. 231-242). New York: Plenum Press. DefenseResearch Series, Volume 2.10. Wortman, D.B., Duket, D.D., & Leifert, DJ. (!976). SAINT simulation of a remotely piloted vehicle/dronecontrol facility: Model development and analysis. Wright-Patterson Air <strong>For</strong>ce Base, Ohio: Aerospace MedicalResearch Laboratory.NATO UNCLASSIFIED99-