11.07.2015 Views

Jul-Sep, 2012 - Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Jul-Sep, 2012 - Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Jul-Sep, 2012 - Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rao JR - Development and Validation <strong>of</strong> an Instrument to Assess the Perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmacy</strong> Students' on Medication Review ProcessTable 4: Factor loading <strong>of</strong> the itemsS.NO Item No. Item Factors1 2 31. 4 Conducting Medication Review improves the intervening capability <strong>of</strong> 0.539pharmacist2. 6 Medication Review improves patient compliance and health status 0.6123. 7 Medication Review ensures safe and cost effective therapy to the patient 0.7454. 8 Medication Review optimizes polypharmacy prescriptions 0.6665. 9 Medication Review ensures appropriateness <strong>of</strong> therapy through detection 0.455and prevention <strong>of</strong> drug related problems6. 12 Medication Review considers Medication History Interview (MHI) and 0.454Medication reconciliation to ensure therapeutic individualization7. 10 There is a need for Structured format to conduct Medication Review 0.8118. 11 There is a need <strong>of</strong> specific training to conduct and document 0.814medication review9. 13 Medication Review requires lot <strong>of</strong> Time and Effort to learn and practice 0.43610. 1 Medication Review is necessary to be conducted by all clinical pharmacists 0.65311. 2 Medication Review is pr<strong>of</strong>essionally rewarding and valuable to one's career0.53512. 3 Medication Review is useful in improving communication with Patients0.64as well as health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals13. 5 Medication Review is a core requirement <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutical care 0.445Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.(Factor loadings: > 0.4 significant and > 0.5 very significant)DISCUSSIONThe present study is an attempt to analyze perception <strong>of</strong>medication review by the pharmacists in India. An instrument(MeRPA) was developed to assess the medication reviewperception and the reliability and factor validity were tested.In a study conducted by MacIntosh et al a tool was developedto measure the pharmacist's attitudes and barriers <strong>of</strong>providing medication review. In this MacIntosh's study,Respondents agreed that Medication therapy management(MTM) services would be perceived valuable by patients,improves clinical outcomes. Survey results includespharmacists are more appropriate to provide MTM service[16]especially trained personnel. Respondents <strong>of</strong> the presentstudy also expressed positive opinion on medication reviewservice and considering it as necessary to be conducted byclinical pharmacists and useful in improving communicationwith patients and health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.In a study conducted by Latif and Boardman with a developedquestionnaire to explore the attitude <strong>of</strong> communitypharmacists towards medication use review service theyfound that pharmacists felt, lack <strong>of</strong> time and non-availability19<strong>of</strong> support staff as barriers to medication review. Fewrespondents in the present study also felt the lack <strong>of</strong> time as aconstraint. According to respondents <strong>of</strong> Latif and Boardmanstudy respondents <strong>of</strong> the opinion, MURs were an opportunityfor pharmacist to improve the skill, practice the pr<strong>of</strong>ession19and to provide better service to patients.Respondents had excellent understanding on medicationreview process. No significant association was foundbetween age, sex and level <strong>of</strong> education in perception <strong>of</strong>medication review. In this survey, the year <strong>of</strong> study had asignificant impact in perception <strong>of</strong> medication review.PharmD IV year students had significantly betterunderstanding on medication review process compared t<strong>of</strong>inal year B.Pharm, first year M.Pharm and second and thirdyears <strong>of</strong> PharmD courses. As these students were the firstbatch in India, their eagerness and readiness to be a member <strong>of</strong>health care team, has led them to perceive the medicationreview at extreme levels.Chronbach alpha value 0.82 explains that the reliability <strong>of</strong> theresponses to the items was good. Three factors were emergedthrough factor analysis; named as Pr<strong>of</strong>essional need <strong>of</strong> MR,Benefit <strong>of</strong> MR and Requirement <strong>of</strong> MR according to the itemsloaded under each factor.The developed instrument can be used to assess themedication review perception. The reliability and constructvalidity <strong>of</strong> the instrument were found, which givesinformation regarding impact <strong>of</strong> motivation and clinical<strong>Indian</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmacy</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> Volume 5 Issue 3 <strong>Jul</strong> - <strong>Sep</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!