TECHNOLOGY Processing 2009 Grade 9 - Tegnologie
TECHNOLOGY Processing 2009 Grade 9 - Tegnologie TECHNOLOGY Processing 2009 Grade 9 - Tegnologie
EVALUATIONEvaluationDate:_________________________Strong vs Weak points______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Possible changes and improvements______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________AssessmentAspectLevel 7(Masteredexcellently)Level 6(Meritoriouslymastered )Level 5(Substantiallymastered)Level 4 (Adequatelymastered)Level 3(Moderatelymastered)Level 2(Elementarymastered)Level 1(Not mastered)MarkEvaluationRelevant evaluationcriteria. Usefulideas to improveproduct.Reasonableevaluation criteriaand ideas toimprove product.Evaluation criteriaunclear. Ideas toimprove productirrelevant.No evaluation criteria.Ideas to improveproduct incomplete.___10Group EvaluationWrite down the name/s of the members of your group in the table below. Give each member amark out of 10 for cooperation.Name & Surname Mark out 1017
- Page 1 and 2: TECHNOLOGYProcessingHoërskool Gerr
- Page 3 and 4: INVESTIGATIONPreserving materialsNo
- Page 5 and 6: Galvanised ironThe main method of p
- Page 7 and 8: slightly damp. Grain kernels in con
- Page 9 and 10: If you have access to the internet
- Page 11 and 12: AssessmentAspectResourceTask 2Level
- Page 13 and 14: Pros and cons: ____________________
- Page 15 and 16: Make 3-D drawings of your product.
- Page 17: ProjectDate: ______________________
EVALUATIONEvaluationDate:_________________________Strong vs Weak points______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Possible changes and improvements______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________AssessmentAspectLevel 7(Masteredexcellently)Level 6(Meritoriouslymastered )Level 5(Substantiallymastered)Level 4 (Adequatelymastered)Level 3(Moderatelymastered)Level 2(Elementarymastered)Level 1(Not mastered)MarkEvaluationRelevant evaluationcriteria. Usefulideas to improveproduct.Reasonableevaluation criteriaand ideas toimprove product.Evaluation criteriaunclear. Ideas toimprove productirrelevant.No evaluation criteria.Ideas to improveproduct incomplete.___10Group EvaluationWrite down the name/s of the members of your group in the table below. Give each member amark out of 10 for cooperation.Name & Surname Mark out 1017
Change language