11.07.2015 Views

Vol. 6 Num. 1 - GCG: Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y ...

Vol. 6 Num. 1 - GCG: Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y ...

Vol. 6 Num. 1 - GCG: Revista de Globalización, Competitividad y ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Clemente Hernán<strong>de</strong>z-Rodríguez & Raúl Francisco Montalvo-Corzo6. Concluding Remarks81The agglomeration of companies provi<strong>de</strong>s dynamism and growth to the economy, and ifcarried out as planned also brings together all participants in a cluster <strong>de</strong>velopment. Thebenefits generated from external economies permeate through agglomerated companiesand down to the inhabitants of the region, giving way to not only economic but also culturalgrowth.In addition, the efforts of the governments of the People’s Republic of China and Mexico tointegrate clusters have followed different routes. China has implemented more stringent policiesand practices changing the way of doing business, and the government has provi<strong>de</strong>dthe environment for growth to happen. However, Chinese products have not yet reached alevel of quality high enough to be recognized internationally as a valued brand. In Mexico, onthe other hand, there are agglomerations that have emerged spontaneously and that operatein a mo<strong>de</strong>rately efficient way, mainly because the policies established by the governmenthave not been strong enough to internalize the un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the benefits of the cluster.However, the government intends to encourage their growth through some supporting institutionsestablished for that purpose. Universities also do their work, and in some statessuccessful clusters exist.One lesson that policy makers can learn from China is the benefit of a good <strong>de</strong>al of unilateralpolicy setting with the aim fixed on economic growth. Its population has raised living standardsgenerally speaking, and the government has earned the trust of its inhabitants. On theother hand, Mexico and its plural participation seem not to agree on the path to improvementthat must be followed. These situations are reflected in the overall competitiveness of bothcountries. With the loss of global competitiveness, the action of public policy should be moreaggressive, consistent, and persistent, i<strong>de</strong>ntifying activities that can be integrated to enhancethe competitiveness of a region. In addition, Mexico should raise awareness among statesthat one path to productivity is the organized efforts of clusters, and should encourage regionalmanufactured products in or<strong>de</strong>r to raise standards through the creation and applicationof technology. In any case, the creation of an exclusive agency responsible for coordinatingand monitoring efforts is necessary (OECD, 2009b).<strong>GCG</strong> GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSIA ENERO-ABRIL 2012 VOL. 6 NUM. 1 ISSN: 1988-7116pp: 55-90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!