Edy WongTable 2: China’s R & D Expenditures and Activities, 2004 – 20081412004 2005 2006 2007 2008Full-time Equivalentof R&D115.3 136.5 150.2 173.6 196.5Personnel(10,000 Manyear)(18.41%)* (10.05%) (15.58%) (13.21%)Funding for S&TActivities4328.3 5250.8 6196.7 7695.2 9123.8(100million RMB) (21.31%) (18.01%) (24.18%) (18.56%)Expenditure onR&D1966.3 2450 3003.1 3710.2 4616(100 million RMB) (24.60%) (22.58%) (23.55%) (24.41%)R & D Expenditureas % of1.23 1.33 1.42 1.44 1.54GDP# of PatentsApplication Accepted353807 476264 573178 693917 828328(piece)(34.61%) (20.35%) (21.06%) (19.37%)# of PatentsApplication190238 214003 268002 351782 411982Granted (piece)(12.49%) (25.23%) (31.26%) (17.11%)Note: * indicates annual rates of growth.Source: China Statistical Yearbook 2005 and 2009.An overview of China’s R&D expenditures and activities is given in Table 2. The upward trendin R&D expenditure and activities in China is beyond doubt, but it is the quality of such activitiesthat has been the subject of scrutiny among scholars and observers. Whether the patentapplications in China are an appropriate indicator of China’s rising technological prowess isopen to dispute. International patent applications are generally accepted as a more accuratemeasure of a country’s R&D outputs 4 . When PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) applicationsare used as an indicator, China is ranked among the top five nations in the world, as illustratedin Table 3.4. A more exacting benchmark would be patents associated with market-ready or commercially applicable technology.<strong>GCG</strong> GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSIA ENERO-ABRIL 2012 VOL. 6 NUM. 1 ISSN: 1988-7116pp: 136-155
China’s Move up the Value Chain. A Framework for Analysis142Table 3: PCT international applications – Top 15 countriesRANKING COUNTRY 2006 2007 2008 20091UnitedStates ofAmerica2010ESTIMATE2010PERCENT2010GROWTH51,280 54,043 51,637 45,618 44,855 27.5% -1.7%2 Japan 27,025 27,743 28,760 29,802 32,156 19.7% 7.9%3 Germany 16,736 17,821 18,855 16,797 17,171 10.5% 2.2%4 China 3,942 5,455 6,120 7,900 12,337 7.6% 56.2%5Republicof Korea5,945 7,064 7,899 8,035 9,686 5.9% 20.5%6 France 6,256 6,560 7,072 7,237 7,193 4.4% -0.6%789UnitedKingdomNetherlandsSwitzerland5,097 5,542 5,466 5,044 4,857 3.0% -3.7%4,553 4,433 4,363 4,462 4,097 2.5% -8.2%3,621 3,833 3,799 3,671 3,611 2.2% -1.6%10 Swe<strong>de</strong>n 3,336 3,655 4,137 3,567 3,152 1.9% -11.6%11 Canada 2,575 2,879 2,976 2,527 2,707 1.7% 7.1%12 Italy 2,698 2,946 2,883 2,652 2,632 1.6% -0.8%13 Finland 1,846 2,009 2,214 2,123 2,076 1.3% -2.2%14 Australia 1,996 2,052 1,938 1,740 1,736 1.1% -0.2%15 Spain 1,204 1,297 1,390 1,564 1,725 1.1% 10.3%All Others 11,531 12,595 13,725 12,659 12,909 7.9% 2.0%Total 149,641 159,927 163,234 155,398 162,900Source: WIPO News and Events, World Intellectual Properties Organization, 2011.This emergence of China’s status as an R&D conten<strong>de</strong>r is the result of a <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> of doubledigitgrowth in its R&D spending, as indicated in Table 2. However, in absolute amounts,China’s R&D spending has remained only a fraction of the level observed in most <strong>de</strong>velopednations. It is thus reasonable to conclu<strong>de</strong> that, <strong>de</strong>spite China’s aggressive support for R&Dactivities, it will be some time before it can assert dominance as a technological powerhouse.While some evi<strong>de</strong>nce of initial success is reported, there remains much concern with China’scapability to do become a producer and exporter of high technology products. GivenChina’s production capability and factor endowment, it is generally accepted that further<strong>de</strong>velopment of suitable human resources, technological know-how, management expertiseskills, and other innovative skills is required for China to move up the value chain. The currentsupplies of such ingredients in China are consi<strong>de</strong>red ina<strong>de</strong>quate by many for a rapidtransformation and upgra<strong>de</strong> of China’s value chain position. In<strong>de</strong>ed, these are the same essential<strong>de</strong>terminants of an economy’s long-term competitiveness i<strong>de</strong>ntified in the literature<strong>GCG</strong> GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSIA ENERO-ABRIL 2012 VOL. 6 NUM. 1 ISSN: 1988-7116pp: 136-155