Review of existing Section 106 Agreement - Thanet District Council
Review of existing Section 106 Agreement - Thanet District Council Review of existing Section 106 Agreement - Thanet District Council
possible. Historic stored data will also allow any subsequent noise complaintto be fully assessed, as necessary.The level of sophistication of some Airport Noise Monitoring Systems(ANOMS) available can include the ability to produce continuously availablenoise contours, if required by the nature of the monitoring circumstances.However, in normal circumstances noise contour production on an annual orseasonal basis is adequate, and the contours are more efficiently obtained asa specific and separate task by specialist contractors.The introduction of a monitoring system involves considerable capital, even forthe most basic arrangements, covering not only the cost of the system itself,but the also the purchase of sites off airport to house the NMT sensors, highquality communication links from the NMTs to the central computer. There arealso revenue costs related to system management training, and the recurringmaintenance and calibration tasks once the system is installed. Equallyessential to any of these systems are staff resources dedicated to itsoperation, and to administrate any resulting reporting and complaintsprocesses introduced.3.7 Arrival and departure flight pathsDeparture routes flown by aircraft departing or arriving at an airport aredependent on other air traffic routes above or adjacent to the airport, locationof sensitive landuses such as housing, and the performance capabilities of theaircraft in terms of rate of climb or rate of turn.For departing aircraft it may be possible to develop takeoff routings which turnaircraft away from sensitive areas, with these routes becoming the publishedstandard for the airport, the Standard Instrument Departure routes (SID) TheSID(s) would pass over the least populated areas wherever practical, tobecome the Noise Preferential Route(s) (NPR). An NPR is a corridor some3km wide (1.5km either side of the SID). In respect of aircraft landing thesame principles can apply but the nature of the “funnelling” of the aircraft ontothe runway on the final stages of descent limits routeing possibilities.It must be emphasised that control of an aircraft’s adherence to an NPR islimited since at an altitude of between 3,000 to 7,000ft the main CAA NationalAir Traffic Service (NATS) take over control of the aircraft. The NATSrecognises environmental objectives as part of its exercise of air navigationfunctions, and assists in establishing NPRs where possible in conjunction withan airport. Before an NPR can be established or modified NATS proceduresinclude the requirement to carry out a full safety case evaluation. In addition aformal public consultation process is necessary for changes to air routeingsbelow 7,000ft altitude, and when proposed changes would have a significanteffect on the level and distribution of noise in the vicinity of an airport or theshape of its existing noise contours.Deviation from the NPR can occur for a variety of reasons such as the need tomaintain safety separation from other aircraft, adverse weather conditions, orairways congestion near to navigational beacons, rather than simply error bythe aircraft. A resulting Non Standard Departure (NSD) may be directed byEU00142:FINAL REPORT PAGE 12
- Page 7 and 8: In respect of noise mitigation meas
- Page 9 and 10: Directive 2002/49/EC does not intro
- Page 11 and 12: appellate Court in deciding what is
- Page 13: Each aircraft type and subtype has
- Page 17 and 18: must be in place and clearly public
- Page 19 and 20: Bournemouth has no formal policy in
- Page 21 and 22: • 2330-0600 - Aircraft with quota
- Page 23 and 24: and east and greenbelt rural areas
- Page 25 and 26: 4.17 Teeside International AirportT
- Page 27 and 28: which 1,980 were by dedicated freig
- Page 29 and 30: is unclear whether 12 landings and
- Page 31 and 32: There also needs to a clear and “
- Page 33 and 34: As an initial action, Section 10.1
- Page 35 and 36: Demonstrable monitoring and enforce
- Page 37 and 38: 7 Review of Section 106 Agreements
- Page 39 and 40: • Limitations on the number of an
- Page 41 and 42: Appendix A1Current KIA Section 106
- Page 43 and 44: 1.4.1 departures to European destin
- Page 45 and 46: 4. Preferred Departure RunwayThe Ow
- Page 47 and 48: having used all reasonably endeavou
- Page 49 and 50: 9.4 Not knowingly to permit any air
- Page 51 and 52: IN WITNESS whereof the Parties have
- Page 53 and 54: Appendix A2Planestation’s Proposa
- Page 55 and 56: 3.1 The policy will apply only, for
- Page 57: Appendix B1KIA 57-72 dBA Leq 16 hou
- Page 61: Appendix B3KIA 54-72 dBA Leq 16 hou
possible. Historic stored data will also allow any subsequent noise complaintto be fully assessed, as necessary.The level <strong>of</strong> sophistication <strong>of</strong> some Airport Noise Monitoring Systems(ANOMS) available can include the ability to produce continuously availablenoise contours, if required by the nature <strong>of</strong> the monitoring circumstances.However, in normal circumstances noise contour production on an annual orseasonal basis is adequate, and the contours are more efficiently obtained asa specific and separate task by specialist contractors.The introduction <strong>of</strong> a monitoring system involves considerable capital, even forthe most basic arrangements, covering not only the cost <strong>of</strong> the system itself,but the also the purchase <strong>of</strong> sites <strong>of</strong>f airport to house the NMT sensors, highquality communication links from the NMTs to the central computer. There arealso revenue costs related to system management training, and the recurringmaintenance and calibration tasks once the system is installed. Equallyessential to any <strong>of</strong> these systems are staff resources dedicated to itsoperation, and to administrate any resulting reporting and complaintsprocesses introduced.3.7 Arrival and departure flight pathsDeparture routes flown by aircraft departing or arriving at an airport aredependent on other air traffic routes above or adjacent to the airport, location<strong>of</strong> sensitive landuses such as housing, and the performance capabilities <strong>of</strong> theaircraft in terms <strong>of</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> climb or rate <strong>of</strong> turn.For departing aircraft it may be possible to develop take<strong>of</strong>f routings which turnaircraft away from sensitive areas, with these routes becoming the publishedstandard for the airport, the Standard Instrument Departure routes (SID) TheSID(s) would pass over the least populated areas wherever practical, tobecome the Noise Preferential Route(s) (NPR). An NPR is a corridor some3km wide (1.5km either side <strong>of</strong> the SID). In respect <strong>of</strong> aircraft landing thesame principles can apply but the nature <strong>of</strong> the “funnelling” <strong>of</strong> the aircraft ontothe runway on the final stages <strong>of</strong> descent limits routeing possibilities.It must be emphasised that control <strong>of</strong> an aircraft’s adherence to an NPR islimited since at an altitude <strong>of</strong> between 3,000 to 7,000ft the main CAA NationalAir Traffic Service (NATS) take over control <strong>of</strong> the aircraft. The NATSrecognises environmental objectives as part <strong>of</strong> its exercise <strong>of</strong> air navigationfunctions, and assists in establishing NPRs where possible in conjunction withan airport. Before an NPR can be established or modified NATS proceduresinclude the requirement to carry out a full safety case evaluation. In addition aformal public consultation process is necessary for changes to air routeingsbelow 7,000ft altitude, and when proposed changes would have a significanteffect on the level and distribution <strong>of</strong> noise in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> an airport or theshape <strong>of</strong> its <strong>existing</strong> noise contours.Deviation from the NPR can occur for a variety <strong>of</strong> reasons such as the need tomaintain safety separation from other aircraft, adverse weather conditions, orairways congestion near to navigational beacons, rather than simply error bythe aircraft. A resulting Non Standard Departure (NSD) may be directed byEU00142:FINAL REPORT PAGE 12