Review of existing Section 106 Agreement - Thanet District Council
Review of existing Section 106 Agreement - Thanet District Council Review of existing Section 106 Agreement - Thanet District Council
seeking advice from the air traffic service provider and the CAA, it cannotmake a planning condition that has a direct effect on these arrangements.The CAA Safety Regulation Group may comment, and makerecommendations, if necessary, in respect of the effects of proposeddevelopment on or in the vicinity of an airport that could conflict with runwaysafeguarding and obstacle clearance criteria.2.8 Planning Policy Guidance Note 24 : Planning and NoiseIt is not intended to address all PPGs which could influence airportdevelopment and operation, but discussion is justified in respect of PPG 24.Issued in 1994, PPG 24 replaced earlier guidance given in DoE Circular10/73. It gives advice to local planning authorities in England on the use oftheir planning powers to minimise the adverse impacts of noise, from allmodes of transport and from heavy industry. PPG 24 sets out theconsiderations to be taken into account in determining applications for noisesensitive developments, such as homes, schools and hospitals, and also forthose activities that will generate noise. It specifies noise exposure categoriesfor residential development and recommends appropriate levels of exposureto different sources of noise, drawing on guidance from the World HealthOrganisation (WHO) and other sources.____________________________________________________________________PPG 24 Annex 1 – Recommended Noise Exposure Categories For NewDwellings Near Existing Noise SourcesAir Traffic - Summary of recommended Noise Exposure Categories (NECs)Time NEC NEC NEC NECA B C D0700-2300 722300-0700 66ClassificationABNoise level may not be desirable at upper level of category, but should not bea determining factor in granting permissionNoise should be taken into account and conditions imposed whereappropriateC Permission should not normally be refused. If permission is permitted,conditions should be imposed to protect against noiseDPlanning permission should normally be refusedNotes :• LAeq level : relates to a cumulative 16 hour daytime or 8 hour night time noisecontour for a “busy period” of airport activity• Night Time Noise Levels : where individual events regularly exceed 82.5 dB LAmaxseveral times in every hour sites should be treated as NEC C regardless of LAeq-8hr(except where the LAeq-8hr already puts the site in NEC D)• Aircraft Noise : daytime values accord with the contour values adopted by DfT whichrelate to levels measured 1.2m above open ground____________________________________________________________________PPGs are guidance not law, but will indicate the likely stance to be taken bythe Secretary of State in any given case, and be taken into account by anEU00142:FINAL REPORT PAGE 7
appellate Court in deciding what is reasonable. It is vital that the localplanning authority follows such guidance in considering noise sensitivedevelopment in the vicinity of an airport. There are instances across the UKwhere such advice has not be followed resulting in new development takingplace in an inappropriate location in noise terms, or without the requirementfor mitigation measures being a condition of development.EU00142:FINAL REPORT PAGE 8
- Page 7 and 8: In respect of noise mitigation meas
- Page 9: Directive 2002/49/EC does not intro
- Page 13: Each aircraft type and subtype has
- Page 16 and 17: the Air Traffic Controllers both be
- Page 18 and 19: 4 Review of UK Airport Noise Polici
- Page 20 and 21: 4.6 Exeter International AirportExe
- Page 22 and 23: London Stansted is four miles to th
- Page 24 and 25: Norwich Airport is presently review
- Page 26 and 27: 5 KIA - Future Development and Airp
- Page 28 and 29: 6 KIA - Existing Section 106 Agreem
- Page 30 and 31: 6.3 General noise limitationsThe 19
- Page 32 and 33: Such additional investment would ne
- Page 34 and 35: 6.14 Third partiesIt is important t
- Page 36 and 37: time noise contours” will be calc
- Page 38 and 39: previous financial year. An annual
- Page 40 and 41: The Noise Control measures include
- Page 42 and 43: SECOND SCHEDULEThis schedule sets o
- Page 44 and 45: 2.1.1 ensure that the number of Fli
- Page 46 and 47: 5.2 submit to the Council and to MA
- Page 48 and 49: 8.2 on and after 1st April 2002 pay
- Page 50 and 51: 11.2 Prior to and in sufficient tim
- Page 52 and 53: PWB/wAgreement/h.CAS/HW/VJN - 11 -
- Page 54 and 55: KENT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - MANSTO
- Page 56 and 57: 6.2 Any night time passenger arriva
- Page 59: Appendix B2KIA 54-72 dBA Leq 16 hou
seeking advice from the air traffic service provider and the CAA, it cannotmake a planning condition that has a direct effect on these arrangements.The CAA Safety Regulation Group may comment, and makerecommendations, if necessary, in respect <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> proposeddevelopment on or in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> an airport that could conflict with runwaysafeguarding and obstacle clearance criteria.2.8 Planning Policy Guidance Note 24 : Planning and NoiseIt is not intended to address all PPGs which could influence airportdevelopment and operation, but discussion is justified in respect <strong>of</strong> PPG 24.Issued in 1994, PPG 24 replaced earlier guidance given in DoE Circular10/73. It gives advice to local planning authorities in England on the use <strong>of</strong>their planning powers to minimise the adverse impacts <strong>of</strong> noise, from allmodes <strong>of</strong> transport and from heavy industry. PPG 24 sets out theconsiderations to be taken into account in determining applications for noisesensitive developments, such as homes, schools and hospitals, and also forthose activities that will generate noise. It specifies noise exposure categoriesfor residential development and recommends appropriate levels <strong>of</strong> exposureto different sources <strong>of</strong> noise, drawing on guidance from the World HealthOrganisation (WHO) and other sources.____________________________________________________________________PPG 24 Annex 1 – Recommended Noise Exposure Categories For NewDwellings Near Existing Noise SourcesAir Traffic - Summary <strong>of</strong> recommended Noise Exposure Categories (NECs)Time NEC NEC NEC NECA B C D0700-2300 722300-0700 66ClassificationABNoise level may not be desirable at upper level <strong>of</strong> category, but should not bea determining factor in granting permissionNoise should be taken into account and conditions imposed whereappropriateC Permission should not normally be refused. If permission is permitted,conditions should be imposed to protect against noiseDPlanning permission should normally be refusedNotes :• LAeq level : relates to a cumulative 16 hour daytime or 8 hour night time noisecontour for a “busy period” <strong>of</strong> airport activity• Night Time Noise Levels : where individual events regularly exceed 82.5 dB LAmaxseveral times in every hour sites should be treated as NEC C regardless <strong>of</strong> LAeq-8hr(except where the LAeq-8hr already puts the site in NEC D)• Aircraft Noise : daytime values accord with the contour values adopted by DfT whichrelate to levels measured 1.2m above open ground____________________________________________________________________PPGs are guidance not law, but will indicate the likely stance to be taken bythe Secretary <strong>of</strong> State in any given case, and be taken into account by anEU00142:FINAL REPORT PAGE 7
Change language