26.11.2012 Views

4 - City of Oxford

4 - City of Oxford

4 - City of Oxford

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9776E1 ooneas.ana<br />

MINUTE BOOK No. 24, CITY OF OXFORD<br />

that the Board ask the <strong>City</strong> Engineer to prepare and recommend to the <strong>City</strong> Board<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> specifications <strong>of</strong> standards for waterline installations, sanitary<br />

sewer installations, acceptable curb and gutter, and also street installation.<br />

I would recommend that he consider and include, if feasible, some difference <strong>of</strong>,<br />

standard <strong>of</strong> street construction for streets <strong>of</strong> differing character as indicated<br />

in the regulations. In other words, the streets that are designed to carry the<br />

heavy load <strong>of</strong> traffic should meet more exacting specifications than a dead end<br />

street in a small residential area. I feel that this could be accomplished<br />

within a period <strong>of</strong> two months and returned to the Board for its action. Al-<br />

though this may require some time on the part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> Engineer for deve-<br />

lopment on paper, I feel that it will become a timesaving device for him in<br />

the future if such standards <strong>of</strong> specifications are on file in his <strong>of</strong>fice and<br />

available to the people who would be constructing such things.<br />

I very strongly urge that the street department in its immediate and<br />

long range planning communicate with the State Highway Department with refer-<br />

ence to its long range plans for highways entering and leaving <strong>Oxford</strong>, as<br />

there are many instances when an understanding <strong>of</strong> such would lead to wiser<br />

spending <strong>of</strong> our city funds in street development.<br />

There came on for consideration the matter <strong>of</strong> the feasibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>City</strong> consumating an arrangement with Charles H. Warner, John P. Morrow, Jr.,<br />

W. E. Rose, Leona Rose, Eli Hughes and Nancy L. Hughes whereby the <strong>City</strong> would own<br />

an entire interest in a certain 25 acre tract in Marion County, Arkansas, rather<br />

than an undivided a interest in a 100 acre tract in the same county and state.<br />

The land involved if par <strong>of</strong> that deeded to the <strong>City</strong> by Miss Kate A. Skipwith,<br />

and the arrangement had been worked out by Mr. William Lewis, Jr. at the re-<br />

quest <strong>of</strong> the Mayor and Board.<br />

It appearing to the Mayor and Board that the foregoing is most desirable<br />

and in the best interest <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>, on motion <strong>of</strong> Alderman McLaurin, seconded<br />

by Alderman Pettis, and passed unanimously, the Mayor and <strong>City</strong> Clerk were<br />

authorized and directed to execute and deliver the following deeds for and in<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> to the grantees therein set out, such delivery to be made<br />

when said grantees convey and warrant unto the <strong>City</strong> a deed to the aforementioned<br />

25 acres, being the Southeast Quarter <strong>of</strong> the Northeast Quarter <strong>of</strong> the Northeast<br />

Quarter <strong>of</strong> Section 9 and the West Half <strong>of</strong> the West Half <strong>of</strong> the Northwest Quar-<br />

ter <strong>of</strong> the Northwest Quarter <strong>of</strong> Section 10, Township 17 North, Range 14 West,<br />

Marion County, Arkansas.<br />

The deeds are as follows:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!