11.07.2015 Views

R:\Storage\AE\Chapman, Ronald (C)\Order denying motion to ...

R:\Storage\AE\Chapman, Ronald (C)\Order denying motion to ...

R:\Storage\AE\Chapman, Ronald (C)\Order denying motion to ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

intimate partner or person, or engaging in otherconduct that would place an intimate partner inreasonable fear of bodily injury <strong>to</strong> the partner or child,except that this paragraph shall only apply <strong>to</strong> a cour<strong>to</strong>rder that –(A) was issued after a hearing of which such a personreceived actual notice, and at which such person hadthe opportunity <strong>to</strong> participate;(B) restrains such person from harassing, stalking, orthreatening an intimate partner of such person or childof such intimate partner of person, or engaging inconduct that would place an intimate partner inreasonable fear of bodily injury <strong>to</strong> the partner orchild; and(C)(i) includes a finding that such person representsa credible threat <strong>to</strong> the physical safety of suchintimate partner or child; or(ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempteduse, or threatened use of physical force against suchintimate partner or child that would reasonably beexpected <strong>to</strong> cause bodily injury . . . <strong>to</strong> . . . possess . .. any firearm or ammunition.I. The Indictment Is Not Rendered Defective As a Result of the Protective Order’s Lackof Finding or Factual Support for a Finding of “Intimate Partners”To prove a violation of 922(g)(8) the United States must prove several elements beyond areasonable doubt, namely: 1) that the defendant knowingly possessed a firearm; 2) at a time whenhe was subject <strong>to</strong> a qualifying court order; and, 3) that the firearm was in or affecting interstatecommerce. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8). Several procedural protections must be in place for a DVPO <strong>to</strong>be applicable <strong>to</strong> a § 922(g)(8) restriction; these include: 1) that the order was issued after a hearinghad been scheduled; 2) that the defendant received actual notice of the hearing, and 3) that he hadan opportunity <strong>to</strong> participate in the hearing. Id. The government must also prove, beyond areasonable doubt, that the order contains specific contents: 1) that it restrains the defendant fromharassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or engaging in other conduct that would place-5-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!