Upreti, Trilochan, International Watercourses Law and Its Application ...

Upreti, Trilochan, International Watercourses Law and Its Application ... Upreti, Trilochan, International Watercourses Law and Its Application ...

internationalwaterlaw.org
from internationalwaterlaw.org More from this publisher
11.07.2015 Views

182 / International Watercourses Law and Its Application in South Asia Prospects and Problems of Nepalese Water Resources / 183immediately becomes surface runoff; out of the remaining 36%,some is retained in the form of snow and ice in the highHimalayas, while some percolates through the ground as snowand groundwater, and some is lost by evaporation andtranspiration. The water retained in the form of snow feeds therivers during the dry season. 7The available hydrological data reveals the estimated annualrunoff into the rivers of Nepal to be 220 billion cubic metres,with the average annual precipitation being 1530 mm per year. 8The influence of heavy rain during the monsoon causes widefluctuations in river flow, land erosion and landslides, which isaggravated by the extreme topographic relief and fragilegeological construction of the country. These factors cause therivers to carry high sediment loads during high flows.Moreover, the snow and glacier melt also brings heavy loads ofsediment during summer months, which is considered animportant factor determining the extent of water-related hazardsin the downstream territory. 9Nepal possesses energy in the form of hydropower andfirewood; no other energy resources have been discovered insignificant quantities (e.g. coal, oil, gas). Hydropower offershuge potential, but so far only 20% of the population haveaccess to electricity. Several studies suggest that Nepaltheoretically has 83000 MW of hydropower potential, morethan the combined total produced by the United States, Canadaand Mexico, of which about 43000 MW is presently consideredeconomically viable to harness. 10 Despite the abundance ofwater resources, only about one third of the population has got7 Ibid.8 C.K. Sharma, A Treatise on Water Resources of Nepal, Kathmandu:Sangita Sharma, 1999, p. 33.9 C. P. Sinha, "Sediment Management; A Co-operative Indo-NepalVentures" (1994) in 4 Water Nepal, pp. 158-163.10 S. P. Subedi, “Hydro-Diplomacy in South Asia: The Conclusion of theMahakali and Ganges River Treaties” (1999) in 93 AJIL, p. 954.access to safe water, and only 42% of the net calculated landhas been irrigated so far. 11This chapter aims to discuss and analyse the abundance of thewater resources in Nepal, their significance for the country’ssocio-economic development, and associated legal issues fromthe perspective of IWL. Furthermore, issues inextricablyintertwined with the transboundary freshwater resources,(ranging across hydrological, geographical, political, socioeconomic,and technical fields) will also be dealt with in thelight of existing legal principles and practices. The issues ofbilateral Indo-Nepal co-operation and of regional cooperationwith Bangladesh and Bhutan will also be covered, with a focuson water resource issues. These issues will be criticallyanalysed in the light of the previous chapter’s discussion ofequity4.2 Potential for Nepalese WatercoursesNepal is endowed with immense water resource’s potential,which, if utilised properly would be a boon both for herself andfor countries further downstream. The benefits could be appliedto several spheres, namely hydropower generation, theextension of irrigation facilities, and particularly navigation,which is crucial for the landlocked countries of Nepal andBhutan and the north-eastern states of India, which couldaccess the sea via Bangladeshi territory. Moreover, floodcontrol, industrial, recreational and other benefits arepossible. 12 However, the reality is that in order to gainmaximum benefits, such transboundary resources should bedeveloped in a holistic and integrated manner ignoring nationalbarriers. This is because, due to the nature of these rivers and ofthe geography of the area, the optimum site for the barrage (a11 Supra note 2. pp. 13-14.12 B. Crow, A. Lindquist & D. Wilson, Sharing the Ganges: The Politicsand Technology of River Development, New Delhi: Saga Pub., 1995,pp. 218-237.

184 / International Watercourses Law and Its Application in South Asia Prospects and Problems of Nepalese Water Resources / 185structure for storing water) might be in one state (e.g. Nepal),the benefits could be accrued in other states (e.g. India andBangladesh), and such benefits could be shared by yet morestates. 13 The principle of equity can dictate how this may beproperly resolved.It has been proved in several parts of the world that basin-widedevelopment of water resources could provide immensebenefits to all riparian nations/states, e.g. the Tennessee ValleyAuthority (USA), the Damodar Valley Corporation (India), theAmazon (Latin America), the Columbia (USA-Canada), theMekong (four states of southeast Asia), and likewise manyother IWC’s in various locations. This is so not only fortechnical reasons,however, but also for a multiplicity of socio-economic, legal,political and other inextricably linked reasons. The concept of‘drainage basin’ 14 or ‘watercourse’ 15 has been developed forthese reasons, as has the concept that a watercourse should beregarded as a single unit regardless of political borders. 16 In thebilateral sphere, the successful and renowned model of cooperationbetween the USA and Canada in regard to theColumbia River Treaty has been repeatedly put forward as onebasis for other such co-operative models. Hence, Indo-Nepalwater resources offer opportunities and challenges for overalldevelopment. 17From past experience in south Asia, the states concerned onlybecome involved in order to protect and preserve their own13 D. Gyawali, “Himalayan Waters; Between Euphoric Dreams andGround Realities” in K. Bahadur & M. P. Lama (eds), NewPerspectives on India-Nepal Relations, New Delhi: Har-Ananda Pub.,1995, p. 256.14 Article 1 Helsinki Rules in Report of the ILA, (1966), pp. 484-485.15 Article 1 of the UNCIW, 36 ILM, (1997), p. 721.16 H. A. Smith, The Economic Use of International Rivers, London: P.S.King & Son, 1931, p. 121.17 B. C. Upreti , Politics of Himalayan River Waters, New Delhi: NiralaPub., 1993, pp. 84-88.national interest at the cost of those of other states, and toattempt to maximise their own advantage whilst ignoring theneeds of others. Weak and vulnerable states are always thelosers, because of their lesser capability in the diplomatic,strategic, economic and other spheres. Good examples are theconstruction of the Farakka Barrage by India, the Aswan Damby Egypt and the Three Gorges Dam currently underway inChina; 18 all of these projects are obviously against the letter andspirit of IWL. No state or organisation was actually able to stopthis kind of illegal construction. At the same time weakernations, such as Nepal, Bangladesh and Ethiopia, are prohibitedfrom enjoying equitable utilisation of their own resources dueto the complications of IWL, a problem which will be analysedbelow. As to the relationship that India has had with Nepal andwith Bangladesh in the sphere of water resources, its nature hasnot always been friendly or even satisfactory, when consideringthe Sarada, Kosi and Gandak projects in the former case, andthe Farakka Barrage in the latter. 19 However, by consideringthese issues in the light of the concept of equity in waterresource utilisation, the divergent interests of all riparian statescan be addressed, thus enhancing the prospects of constructiveand meaningful co-operation in the future.The case of Nepalese water resource development is unique incomparison with the circumstances in other countries; Nepalhas huge water resources available with a tiny land arearequiring irrigation and a very low demand for hydroelectricity.Conversely, India has got a huge territory but sufficient water isnot available during the dry season, either for herself or forBangladesh. However, development of these resources could beundertaken for the benefit of the region, for which co-operationamong the nations of south Asia is essential. On the contrary,the demand for water, particularly in the dry season indownstream countries is acute, meaning that a regulated flow of18 www.internationalwaterlaw.org “China completes Three GeorgesDam.”19 Supra note 17, pp. 106-115.

184 / <strong>International</strong> <strong>Watercourses</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Application</strong> in South Asia Prospects <strong>and</strong> Problems of Nepalese Water Resources / 185structure for storing water) might be in one state (e.g. Nepal),the benefits could be accrued in other states (e.g. India <strong>and</strong>Bangladesh), <strong>and</strong> such benefits could be shared by yet morestates. 13 The principle of equity can dictate how this may beproperly resolved.It has been proved in several parts of the world that basin-widedevelopment of water resources could provide immensebenefits to all riparian nations/states, e.g. the Tennessee ValleyAuthority (USA), the Damodar Valley Corporation (India), theAmazon (Latin America), the Columbia (USA-Canada), theMekong (four states of southeast Asia), <strong>and</strong> likewise manyother IWC’s in various locations. This is so not only fortechnical reasons,however, but also for a multiplicity of socio-economic, legal,political <strong>and</strong> other inextricably linked reasons. The concept of‘drainage basin’ 14 or ‘watercourse’ 15 has been developed forthese reasons, as has the concept that a watercourse should beregarded as a single unit regardless of political borders. 16 In thebilateral sphere, the successful <strong>and</strong> renowned model of cooperationbetween the USA <strong>and</strong> Canada in regard to theColumbia River Treaty has been repeatedly put forward as onebasis for other such co-operative models. Hence, Indo-Nepalwater resources offer opportunities <strong>and</strong> challenges for overalldevelopment. 17From past experience in south Asia, the states concerned onlybecome involved in order to protect <strong>and</strong> preserve their own13 D. Gyawali, “Himalayan Waters; Between Euphoric Dreams <strong>and</strong>Ground Realities” in K. Bahadur & M. P. Lama (eds), NewPerspectives on India-Nepal Relations, New Delhi: Har-An<strong>and</strong>a Pub.,1995, p. 256.14 Article 1 Helsinki Rules in Report of the ILA, (1966), pp. 484-485.15 Article 1 of the UNCIW, 36 ILM, (1997), p. 721.16 H. A. Smith, The Economic Use of <strong>International</strong> Rivers, London: P.S.King & Son, 1931, p. 121.17 B. C. <strong>Upreti</strong> , Politics of Himalayan River Waters, New Delhi: NiralaPub., 1993, pp. 84-88.national interest at the cost of those of other states, <strong>and</strong> toattempt to maximise their own advantage whilst ignoring theneeds of others. Weak <strong>and</strong> vulnerable states are always thelosers, because of their lesser capability in the diplomatic,strategic, economic <strong>and</strong> other spheres. Good examples are theconstruction of the Farakka Barrage by India, the Aswan Damby Egypt <strong>and</strong> the Three Gorges Dam currently underway inChina; 18 all of these projects are obviously against the letter <strong>and</strong>spirit of IWL. No state or organisation was actually able to stopthis kind of illegal construction. At the same time weakernations, such as Nepal, Bangladesh <strong>and</strong> Ethiopia, are prohibitedfrom enjoying equitable utilisation of their own resources dueto the complications of IWL, a problem which will be analysedbelow. As to the relationship that India has had with Nepal <strong>and</strong>with Bangladesh in the sphere of water resources, its nature hasnot always been friendly or even satisfactory, when consideringthe Sarada, Kosi <strong>and</strong> G<strong>and</strong>ak projects in the former case, <strong>and</strong>the Farakka Barrage in the latter. 19 However, by consideringthese issues in the light of the concept of equity in waterresource utilisation, the divergent interests of all riparian statescan be addressed, thus enhancing the prospects of constructive<strong>and</strong> meaningful co-operation in the future.The case of Nepalese water resource development is unique incomparison with the circumstances in other countries; Nepalhas huge water resources available with a tiny l<strong>and</strong> arearequiring irrigation <strong>and</strong> a very low dem<strong>and</strong> for hydroelectricity.Conversely, India has got a huge territory but sufficient water isnot available during the dry season, either for herself or forBangladesh. However, development of these resources could beundertaken for the benefit of the region, for which co-operationamong the nations of south Asia is essential. On the contrary,the dem<strong>and</strong> for water, particularly in the dry season indownstream countries is acute, meaning that a regulated flow of18 www.internationalwaterlaw.org “China completes Three GeorgesDam.”19 Supra note 17, pp. 106-115.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!