ReferencesT, Song X, Day RH, Sledziewski AZ, Lofton-Day C (2008) Sensitive Detection ofColorectal Cancer <strong>in</strong> Peripheral Blood by Sept<strong>in</strong> 9 DNA Methylation Assay.PLoS ONE 3(11): e3759179. Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, Jessup JM, Kemeny N, Macdonald JS, SomerfieldMR, Hayes DF, Bast RC, Jr. (2006) ASCO 2006 update of recommendations forthe use of tumor markers <strong>in</strong> gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al cancer. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Oncol 24(33): 5313-5327180. Løvig T, Mel<strong>in</strong>g GI, Diep CB, Thorstensen L, Norheim AS, Lothe RA, Rognum TO(2002) APC <strong>and</strong> CTNNB1 mutations <strong>in</strong> a large series of sporadic colorectalcarc<strong>in</strong>omas stratified by the microsatellite <strong>in</strong>stability status. Sc<strong>and</strong> JGastroenterol 37(10): 1184-1193181. Diep CB, Thorstensen L, Mel<strong>in</strong>g GI, Skovlund E, Rognum TO, Lothe RA (2003)Genetic tumor markers with prog<strong>no</strong>stic impact <strong>in</strong> Dukes' stages B <strong>and</strong> Ccolorectal cancer patients. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Oncol 21(5): 820-829182. Børresen-Dale AL, Lothe RA, Mel<strong>in</strong>g GI, Ha<strong>in</strong>aut P, Rognum TO, Skovlund E(1998) TP53 <strong>and</strong> long-term prog<strong>no</strong>sis <strong>in</strong> colorectal cancer: mutations <strong>in</strong> the L3z<strong>in</strong>c-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g doma<strong>in</strong> predict poor survival. Cl<strong>in</strong> Cancer Res 4(1): 203-210183. Andreyev HJ, Norman AR, Cunn<strong>in</strong>gham D, Oates J, Dix BR, Iacopetta BJ, Young J,Walsh T, Ward R, Hawk<strong>in</strong>s N, Beranek M, J<strong>and</strong>ik P, Benamouzig R, Jullian E,Laurent-Puig P, Olschwang S, Muller O, Hoffmann I, Rabes HM, Zietz C, TroungosC, Valavanis C, Yuen ST, Ho JW, Croke CT, O'Do<strong>no</strong>ghue DP, Giaretti W, RapalloA, Russo A, Bazan V, Tanaka M, Omura K, Azuma T, Ohkusa T, Fujimori T, O<strong>no</strong>Y, Pauly M, Faber C, Glaesener R, de Goeij AF, Arends JW, Andersen SN, Løvig T,Breivik J, Gaudernack G, Clausen OP, De Angelis PD, Mel<strong>in</strong>g GI, Rognum TO,Smith R, Goh HS, Font A, Rosell R, Sun XF, Zhang H, Benhattar J, Losi L, Lee JQ,Wang ST, Clarke PA, Bell S, Quirke P, Bubb VJ, Piris J, Cruickshank NR, Morton D,Fox JC, Al-Mulla F, Lees N, Hall CN, Snary D, Wilk<strong>in</strong>son K, Dillon D, Costa J,Pricolo VE, F<strong>in</strong>kelste<strong>in</strong> SD, Thebo JS, Senagore AJ, Halter SA, Wadler S, Malik S,Krtolica K, Urosevic N (2001) Kirsten ras mutations <strong>in</strong> patients with colorectalcancer: the 'RASCAL II' study. Br J Cancer 85(5): 692-696184. Lewis KA, Bakkum-Gamez J, Loewen R, French AJ, Thibodeau SN, Cliby WA(2007) Mutations <strong>in</strong> the ataxia telangiectasia <strong>and</strong> rad3-related-checkpo<strong>in</strong>tk<strong>in</strong>ase 1 DNA damage response axis <strong>in</strong> colon cancers. Genes ChromosomesCancer 46(12): 1061-1068185. Fern<strong>and</strong>ez-Peralta AM, Nejda N, Oliart S, Med<strong>in</strong>a V, Azcoita MM, Gonzalez-Aguilera JJ (2005) Significance of mutations <strong>in</strong> TGFBR2 <strong>and</strong> BAX <strong>in</strong> neoplasticprogression <strong>and</strong> patient outcome <strong>in</strong> sporadic colorectal tumors with highfrequencymicrosatellite <strong>in</strong>stability. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 157(1): 18-24186. Jung B, Smith EJ, Doctolero RT, Gervaz P, Alonso JC, Miyai K, Keku T, S<strong>and</strong>lerRS, Carethers JM (2006) Influence of target gene mutations on survival, stage82
References<strong>and</strong> histology <strong>in</strong> sporadic microsatellite unstable colon cancers. Int J Cancer118(10): 2509-2513187. Nehls O, Okech T, Hsieh CJ, Enz<strong>in</strong>ger T, Sarbia M, Borchard F, Gruenagel HH,Gaco V, Hass HG, Arkenau HT, Hartmann JT, Porschen R, Gregor M, Klump B(2007) Studies on p53, BAX <strong>and</strong> Bcl-2 prote<strong>in</strong> expression <strong>and</strong> microsatellite<strong>in</strong>stability <strong>in</strong> stage III (UICC) colon cancer treated by adjuvantchemotherapy: major prog<strong>no</strong>stic impact of proapoptotic BAX. Br J Cancer96(9): 1409-1418188. Gao J, Zhang H, Arbman G, Sun XF (2008) RAD50/MRE11/NBS1 prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>relation to tumour development <strong>and</strong> prog<strong>no</strong>sis <strong>in</strong> patients with microsatellitestable colorectal cancer. Histol Histopathol 23(12): 1495-1502189. Mart<strong>in</strong>eau-Thuillier S, Andreassen PR, Margolis RL (1998) Colocalization of TD-60<strong>and</strong> INCENP throughout G2 <strong>and</strong> mitosis: evidence for their possible<strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong> signall<strong>in</strong>g cytok<strong>in</strong>esis. Chromosoma 107(6-7): 461-470190. Moll<strong>in</strong>ari C, Reynaud C, Mart<strong>in</strong>eau-Thuillier S, Monier S, Kieffer S, Gar<strong>in</strong> J,Andreassen PR, Boulet A, Goud B, Kleman JP, Margolis RL (2003) Themammalian passenger prote<strong>in</strong> TD-60 is an RCC1 family member with anessential role <strong>in</strong> prometaphase to metaphase progression. Dev Cell 5(2): 295-307191. Di NF, Mart<strong>in</strong>i M, Mol<strong>in</strong>ari F, Sartore-Bianchi A, Arena S, Saletti P, De DS,Mazzucchelli L, Fratt<strong>in</strong>i M, Siena S, Bardelli A (2008) Wild-type BRAF is requiredfor response to panitumumab or cetuximab <strong>in</strong> metastatic colorectal cancer. JCl<strong>in</strong> Oncol 26(35): 5705-5712192. Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le CD, Boige V, L<strong>and</strong>i B, Emile JF, Cote JF, Tomasic G,Penna C, Ducreux M, Rougier P, Penault-Llorca F, Laurent-Puig P (2006) KRASmutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy <strong>in</strong> colorectalcancer. Cancer Res 66(8): 3992-3995193. Pegg AE (1990) Mammalian O6-alkylguan<strong>in</strong>e-DNA alkyltransferase:regulation <strong>and</strong> importance <strong>in</strong> response to alkylat<strong>in</strong>g carc<strong>in</strong>ogenic <strong>and</strong>therapeutic agents. Cancer Res 50(19): 6119-6129194. Esteller M, Garcia-Foncillas J, Andion E, Goodman SN, Hidalgo OF, Vanaclocha V,Bayl<strong>in</strong> SB, Herman JG (2000) Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT <strong>and</strong>the cl<strong>in</strong>ical response of gliomas to alkylat<strong>in</strong>g agents. N Engl J Med 343(19):1350-1354195. Nagasaka T, Sharp GB, Notohara K, Kambara T, Sasamoto H, Isozaki H, MacPheeDG, Jass JR, Tanaka N, Matsubara N (2003) Hypermethylation of O6-methylguan<strong>in</strong>e-DNA methyltransferase promoter may predict <strong>no</strong>nrecurrenceafter chemotherapy <strong>in</strong> colorectal cancer cases. Cl<strong>in</strong> Cancer Res 9(14): 5306-531283
- Page 1 and 2:
Novel genetic and epigenetic altera
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe present work ha
- Page 7 and 8:
Prefacetechnology[3]. This new tech
- Page 10 and 11:
SummaryThe subgroup of carcinomas w
- Page 12 and 13:
Introduction“Epigenetic inheritan
- Page 14 and 15:
Introductionamino acid change it is
- Page 16 and 17:
Introductionmethylation during embr
- Page 18 and 19:
IntroductionDNA is most of the time
- Page 20 and 21:
IntroductionFigure 5. DNA methylati
- Page 22 and 23:
IntroductionFigure 6. Incidence rat
- Page 24 and 25:
IntroductionFigure 8. Tumor staging
- Page 26 and 27:
Introductioninasmuch as 80% of colo
- Page 28 and 29:
IntroductionInstabilities involved
- Page 30 and 31:
Introductionthere seems to be a fid
- Page 32 and 33: Introductionsevere alterations are
- Page 34 and 35: Introductionpopulation-wide screeni
- Page 36 and 37: IntroductionFigure 12. Present and
- Page 38 and 39: RESULTS IN BRIEFPaper Ia. “DNA hy
- Page 40 and 41: Results in Briefinstability, and se
- Page 42 and 43: Results in BriefUnivariate survival
- Page 44 and 45: Discussionseveral factors, and full
- Page 46 and 47: Discussionlow threshold, we increas
- Page 48 and 49: DiscussionIt may seem like unnecess
- Page 50 and 51: Discussionthan 96% DHPLC do not sta
- Page 52 and 53: DiscussionFigure 13. Mutation detec
- Page 54 and 55: DiscussionClinical impact of molecu
- Page 56 and 57: Discussionmarkers with a very high
- Page 58 and 59: Discussionchromosomes in metaphase[
- Page 60 and 61: DiscussionThese examples underline
- Page 62 and 63: Discussiongenes. One is based on mu
- Page 64 and 65: CONCLUSIONSWe have identified novel
- Page 66 and 67: Future PerspectivesMolecular risk a
- Page 68 and 69: REFERENCES1. Breasted J (1930) The
- Page 70 and 71: References29. Deng G, Chen A, Pong
- Page 72 and 73: References57. Al-Sukhni W, Aronson
- Page 74 and 75: References84. Kunkel TA (1993) Nucl
- Page 76 and 77: ReferencesLeggett B, Levine J, Kim
- Page 78 and 79: References133. Lind GE, Thorstensen
- Page 80 and 81: References156. Meling GI, Lothe RA,
- Page 84 and 85: References196. Honda S, Haruta M, S
- Page 86 and 87: ORIGINAL ARTICLESAPPENDIXAppendix I
- Page 89 and 90: GASTROENTEROLOGY 2007;132:1631-1639
- Page 91: Paper IbGuro E Lind, Terje Ahlquist
- Page 94 and 95: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 96 and 97: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 98 and 99: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 100 and 101: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 102 and 103: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 105: Paper IITerje Ahlquist, Guro E Lind
- Page 108 and 109: BackgroundMost cases of colorectal
- Page 110 and 111: ADAMTS1 CDKN2A CRABP1 HOXA9 MAL MGM
- Page 112 and 113: pseudogene, leading to a high rate
- Page 114 and 115: strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1
- Page 116 and 117: concomitant absence of transcript a
- Page 119 and 120: Volume 10 Number 7 July 2008 pp. 68
- Page 121 and 122: 682 RAS Signaling in Colorectal Car
- Page 123 and 124: 684 RAS Signaling in Colorectal Car
- Page 125 and 126: 686 RAS Signaling in Colorectal Car
- Page 127: Table W2. Detailed Somatic Events o
- Page 131 and 132: Identification of RCC2 as a prognos
- Page 133 and 134:
INTRODUCTIONMicrosatellite instabil
- Page 135 and 136:
unselected series of primary tumors
- Page 137 and 138:
specificity, i.e. that they only am
- Page 139 and 140:
On the assumption that DNA repair a
- Page 141 and 142:
In order to ensure that gene mutati
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 2. Mutation frequency differ
- Page 145 and 146:
and TAF1B (0.50), ACVR2A and ASTE1
- Page 147 and 148:
Multivariate analysesA multivariate
- Page 149 and 150:
When comparing our findings of muta
- Page 151 and 152:
The test series included a low numb
- Page 153 and 154:
entering M-phase remains to be seen
- Page 155 and 156:
12. Duval A, Reperant M, Hamelin R
- Page 157 and 158:
34. Martineau-Thuillier S, Andreass
- Page 159:
AppendicesAppendix I:List of abbrev
- Page 163 and 164:
Critical Reviews TM in Oncogenesis,
- Page 165 and 166:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 167 and 168:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 169 and 170:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 171 and 172:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 173 and 174:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 175 and 176:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 177 and 178:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 179 and 180:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 181 and 182:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 183 and 184:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 185 and 186:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 187 and 188:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 189 and 190:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 191:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC