11.07.2015 Views

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Discussiongenes. One is based on mutation frequency <strong>and</strong> suggests that genes with mutationfrequencies below 12% are considered likely to have <strong>no</strong> functional consequence on tumordevelopment, <strong>and</strong> therefore entitled by-st<strong>and</strong>er genes[204]. The second scheme is to dividegenes <strong>in</strong>to four categories: survivor genes, hibernator genes, cooperator genes <strong>and</strong>transformator genes[205]. Transformator genes confer a positive selection to the cells, havethe highest mutation frequencies, <strong>and</strong> are most likely to be genes driv<strong>in</strong>g tumorigenesis[205].Prior to Paper IV a literature survey was performed[90] <strong>and</strong> only genes pass<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong>criteria, amongst others a mutation frequency exceed<strong>in</strong>g the aforementioned 12% were<strong>in</strong>cluded. As we aimed to identify prog<strong>no</strong>stic markers we wanted ensure that we did <strong>no</strong>tanalyze mere background artifacts.In the field of epi<strong>genetic</strong>s, ge<strong>no</strong>me-wide studies have been performed suggest<strong>in</strong>g that 100-600 genes are subject to promoter hypermethylation <strong>in</strong> a r<strong>and</strong>om tumor[206-208]. Mostlikely, methylation <strong>in</strong>stability, such as CIMP, causes a large number of genes to behypermethylated, <strong>and</strong> similar to the MSI-tumors, only some of the affected genes exerttumorigenic effects.Whether passenger mutations are just relics of some sort of ge<strong>no</strong>me <strong>in</strong>stability <strong>and</strong>completely irrelevant for tumorigenesis or if they apply some m<strong>in</strong>or effect on tumor growthis still questioned. A recent paper argues that for any trait, there will be only a few genes withlarge phe<strong>no</strong>typic effects, but many associated genes hav<strong>in</strong>g small effects, although theircomb<strong>in</strong>ed effect may be substantial[209]. This may be important to keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d whendescrib<strong>in</strong>g a phe<strong>no</strong>type, but whether or <strong>no</strong>t the passenger mutations have phe<strong>no</strong>typic effectsis irrelevant <strong>in</strong> the case of identify<strong>in</strong>g diag<strong>no</strong>stic <strong>and</strong> maybe also prog<strong>no</strong>stic markers, asillustrated by VIM <strong>and</strong> MAL. Indeed, subsequent to our identification of MAL as apotential biomarker, it has been shown that hypermethylation of MAL is significantlyassociated with improved disease-free survival <strong>in</strong> gastric cancer[210]. Hence, MAL can berelevant both for diag<strong>no</strong>s<strong>in</strong>g colorectal cancer <strong>and</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g prog<strong>no</strong>sis <strong>in</strong> gastric cancereven though its impact on tumorigenesis is unresolved.62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!