Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no
Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no
Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Discussiongenes. One is based on mutation frequency <strong>and</strong> suggests that genes with mutationfrequencies below 12% are considered likely to have <strong>no</strong> functional consequence on tumordevelopment, <strong>and</strong> therefore entitled by-st<strong>and</strong>er genes[204]. The second scheme is to dividegenes <strong>in</strong>to four categories: survivor genes, hibernator genes, cooperator genes <strong>and</strong>transformator genes[205]. Transformator genes confer a positive selection to the cells, havethe highest mutation frequencies, <strong>and</strong> are most likely to be genes driv<strong>in</strong>g tumorigenesis[205].Prior to Paper IV a literature survey was performed[90] <strong>and</strong> only genes pass<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong>criteria, amongst others a mutation frequency exceed<strong>in</strong>g the aforementioned 12% were<strong>in</strong>cluded. As we aimed to identify prog<strong>no</strong>stic markers we wanted ensure that we did <strong>no</strong>tanalyze mere background artifacts.In the field of epi<strong>genetic</strong>s, ge<strong>no</strong>me-wide studies have been performed suggest<strong>in</strong>g that 100-600 genes are subject to promoter hypermethylation <strong>in</strong> a r<strong>and</strong>om tumor[206-208]. Mostlikely, methylation <strong>in</strong>stability, such as CIMP, causes a large number of genes to behypermethylated, <strong>and</strong> similar to the MSI-tumors, only some of the affected genes exerttumorigenic effects.Whether passenger mutations are just relics of some sort of ge<strong>no</strong>me <strong>in</strong>stability <strong>and</strong>completely irrelevant for tumorigenesis or if they apply some m<strong>in</strong>or effect on tumor growthis still questioned. A recent paper argues that for any trait, there will be only a few genes withlarge phe<strong>no</strong>typic effects, but many associated genes hav<strong>in</strong>g small effects, although theircomb<strong>in</strong>ed effect may be substantial[209]. This may be important to keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d whendescrib<strong>in</strong>g a phe<strong>no</strong>type, but whether or <strong>no</strong>t the passenger mutations have phe<strong>no</strong>typic effectsis irrelevant <strong>in</strong> the case of identify<strong>in</strong>g diag<strong>no</strong>stic <strong>and</strong> maybe also prog<strong>no</strong>stic markers, asillustrated by VIM <strong>and</strong> MAL. Indeed, subsequent to our identification of MAL as apotential biomarker, it has been shown that hypermethylation of MAL is significantlyassociated with improved disease-free survival <strong>in</strong> gastric cancer[210]. Hence, MAL can berelevant both for diag<strong>no</strong>s<strong>in</strong>g colorectal cancer <strong>and</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g prog<strong>no</strong>sis <strong>in</strong> gastric cancereven though its impact on tumorigenesis is unresolved.62