11.07.2015 Views

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introductionpopulation-wide screen<strong>in</strong>g program. The obstacles of this method are the cost <strong>and</strong>availability of tra<strong>in</strong>ed personnel, as well as reduced compliance over time. R<strong>and</strong>omized trailsdesigned to determ<strong>in</strong>e the efficacy with regards to <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>and</strong> mortality are thereforeneeded <strong>in</strong> order to justify the use of colo<strong>no</strong>scopy as a population based screen<strong>in</strong>gprogram[123].The presence of occult blood <strong>in</strong> feces is considered an <strong>in</strong>dication of CRC, <strong>and</strong> a fecal occultblood test (FOBT) is already <strong>in</strong> use as a screen<strong>in</strong>g program <strong>in</strong> several countries. FOBT isshown to reduce mortality by CRC with 15-33%, but the need for biannual test<strong>in</strong>g hasresulted <strong>in</strong> a decrease <strong>in</strong> patient compliance over time <strong>and</strong> lower the effect of thescreen<strong>in</strong>g[123]. With different FOBT tech<strong>no</strong>logies, variable levels of sensitivity are obta<strong>in</strong>ed,rang<strong>in</strong>g from 5%-99%, while specificity is somewhat higher 65%-99%[124;125]. Suchdiverse results <strong>in</strong>dicate that the test is highly dependent on optimal sample preparation <strong>and</strong>analysis. It also gives both a relatively high degree of false positive <strong>and</strong> false negativef<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. Positive predictive value, or precision rate, is the proportion of patients with whoare correctly diag<strong>no</strong>sed. It is the most important measure of a diag<strong>no</strong>stic method as itreflects the probability that a positive test reflects the underly<strong>in</strong>g condition be<strong>in</strong>g tested for,<strong>and</strong> a high degree of false positives will make the precision rate decrease. On the contrary,negative predictive value is the proportion of patients with negative test results who arecorrectly diag<strong>no</strong>sed <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the same manner, a high rate of false negatives will impair thisnumber. A low precision rate results <strong>in</strong> unnecessary colo<strong>no</strong>scopies, hence reduc<strong>in</strong>g the costeffectiveness of FOBT screen<strong>in</strong>g. Also, FOBT will <strong>no</strong>t detect benign precursor lesions[123].The requirement for better biomarkers is therefore needed from an early detection screen<strong>in</strong>gperspective. A marker with both high sensitivity <strong>and</strong> specificity will <strong>no</strong>t only prevent extracosts due to unnecessary colo<strong>no</strong>scopies, but may also <strong>in</strong>crease the time-<strong>in</strong>tervals betweenrepeated tests. F<strong>in</strong>ally, optimal biomarkers should also be present <strong>in</strong> benign precursor stages<strong>and</strong> thereby <strong>in</strong>crease the time-w<strong>in</strong>dow <strong>in</strong> which remov<strong>in</strong>g the polyp is considered curative.Prog<strong>no</strong>stic <strong>and</strong> predictive markersSurvival is as mentioned associated with tumor phe<strong>no</strong>type, as patients with MSI tumorsgenerally have improved prog<strong>no</strong>sis compared to patients with MSS tumors[59]. In addition,5-flurouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy does <strong>no</strong>t seem to provide survival benefits among34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!