11.07.2015 Views

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introductionsevere <strong>alterations</strong> are described <strong>in</strong> human cancer that can confirm this. On the contrary,germ l<strong>in</strong>e mutation <strong>in</strong> DNMT3B are k<strong>no</strong>wn to cause ICF syndrome (Immu<strong>no</strong>deficiencycentromeric<strong>in</strong>stability- facial a<strong>no</strong>malies syndrome, OMIM #242860), a disease associatedwith hypomethylation of small percentage of the ge<strong>no</strong>me[111], but without elevated cancerrisk. Overexpression of DNMT1 has been a<strong>no</strong>ther suggestion for CIMP development, butdifferent tech<strong>no</strong>logies give <strong>in</strong>consistent results[95]. Also it has also been speculated whetherloss of methylation boundaries may cause CIMP as methylation naturally <strong>in</strong>creases with age.This age-specific methylation is under <strong>no</strong>rmal circumstances kept with<strong>in</strong> its boundaries. Incancer, these boundaries can be lost, lead<strong>in</strong>g to spread<strong>in</strong>g of methylation <strong>and</strong> so-calledcancer-specific methylation[92] ‡‡ .In summary, MSI is the only of the three different <strong>in</strong>stabilities <strong>in</strong> CRC of which we k<strong>no</strong>w thecause, although it seems that the real cause of sporadic MSI is CIMP <strong>and</strong> that MSI is a mereconsequence of CIMP. (refer Figure 10).Signal<strong>in</strong>g pathwaysThe critical feature <strong>in</strong> tumorigenesis is often <strong>no</strong>t the altered gene per se, but rather its<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> a complex signal<strong>in</strong>g network. Alteration <strong>in</strong> one gene may therefore trigger acascade of signal<strong>in</strong>g factors, such as when KRAS activate the mitogen activated prote<strong>in</strong>(MAP) k<strong>in</strong>ase pathway[112]. Hence, from a cancer cell perspective, it is more beneficial toalter a gene <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> signal<strong>in</strong>g networks <strong>in</strong>stead of a “lonesome wolf”.Some pathways play a more prom<strong>in</strong>ent role <strong>in</strong> tumorigenesis than others, possibly because itis easier for the cell to “highjack” them. The WNT pathway is an example of this. It controlsmany events dur<strong>in</strong>g embryogenesis, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g regulation of proliferation, morphology,motility <strong>and</strong> cell fate[113]. It is believed to be dysregulated <strong>in</strong>asmuch as 90% of colorectalcancers <strong>and</strong> APC, AXIN2, CTNNB1 <strong>and</strong> TCF7L2 are the most frequently alteredcomponents[114;115]. The MAP k<strong>in</strong>ase pathway, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g KRAS, BRAF, RASSF1A <strong>and</strong>EGFR as common targets <strong>in</strong> cancer is a<strong>no</strong>ther example <strong>and</strong> is deregulated <strong>in</strong> at least one‡‡ J<strong>in</strong>gm<strong>in</strong> Shu – unpublished – presented on Cancer Epi<strong>genetic</strong>s, AACR Special Conference, Boston, USA,May 200832

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!