Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REFERENCES1. Grady WM, Carethers JM (2008) Genomic and Epigenetic Instability in ColorectalCancer Pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 135(4): 1079-10992. Issa JP (2004) CpG island methylator phenotype in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 4(12):988-9933. Kunkel TA (1993) Nucleotide repeats. Slippery DNA and diseases. Nature365(6443): 207-2084. Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Beiles A, Nevo E (2002) Microsatellites: genomicdistribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Mol Ecol11(12): 2453-24655. Shibata D, Peinado MA, Ionov Y, Malkhosyan S, Perucho M (1994) Genomicinstability in repeated sequences is an early somatic event in colorectaltumorigenesis that persists after transformation. Nat Genet 6(3): 273-2816. Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, Sidransky D, Eshleman JR, Burt RW,Meltzer SJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Fodde R, Ranzani GN, Srivastava S (1998) ANational Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancerdetection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria forthe determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res58(22): 5248-52577. Kuismanen SA, Holmberg MT, Salovaara R, de la CA, Peltomäki P (2000) Geneticand epigenetic modification of MLH1 accounts for a major share ofmicrosatellite-unstable colorectal cancers. Am J Pathol 156(5): 1773-17798. Duval A, Rolland S, Compoint A, Tubacher E, Iacopetta B, Thomas G, Hamelin R(2001) Evolution of instability at coding and non-coding repeat sequences inhuman MSI-H colorectal cancers. Hum Mol Genet 10(5): 513-5189. Popat S, Hubner R, Houlston RS (2005) Systematic review of microsatelliteinstability and colorectal cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol 23(3): 609-61810. Røyrvik EC, Ahlquist T, Rognes T, Lothe RA (2007) Slip slidin' away: aduodecennial review of targeted genes in mismatch repair deficient colorectalcancer. Crit Rev Oncog 13(3): 229-25711. Meling GI, Lothe RA, Børresen AL, Hauge S, Graue C, Clausen OP, Rognum TO(1991) Genetic alterations within the retinoblastoma locus in colorectalcarcinomas. Relation to DNA ploidy pattern studied by flow cytometricanalysis. Br J Cancer 64(3): 475-48024
12. Duval A, Reperant M, Hamelin R (2002) Comparative analysis of mutationfrequency of coding and non coding short mononucleotide repeats in mismatchrepair deficient colorectal cancers. Oncogene 21(52): 8062-806613. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100(1): 57-7014. Woerner SM, Benner A, Sutter C, Schiller M, Yuan YP, Keller G, Bork P, DoeberitzMK, Gebert JF (2003) Pathogenesis of DNA repair-deficient cancers: a statisticalmeta-analysis of putative Real Common Target genes. Oncogene 22(15): 2226-223515. Duffy MJ, van DA, Haglund C, Hansson L, Holinski-Feder E, Klapdor R, Lamerz R,Peltomaki P, Sturgeon C, Topolcan O (2007) Tumour markers in colorectal cancer:European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use. Eur JCancer 43(9): 1348-136016. Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, Jessup JM, Kemeny N, Macdonald JS, SomerfieldMR, Hayes DF, Bast RC, Jr. (2006) ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for theuse of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(33): 5313-532717. Fernandez-Peralta AM, Nejda N, Oliart S, Medina V, Azcoita MM, Gonzalez-AguileraJJ (2005) Significance of mutations in TGFBR2 and BAX in neoplasticprogression and patient outcome in sporadic colorectal tumors with highfrequencymicrosatellite instability. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 157(1): 18-2418. Ionov Y, Yamamoto H, Krajewski S, Reed JC, Perucho M (2000) Mutationalinactivation of the proapoptotic gene BAX confers selective advantage duringtumor clonal evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(20): 10872-1087719. Jung B, Smith EJ, Doctolero RT, Gervaz P, Alonso JC, Miyai K, Keku T, Sandler RS,Carethers JM (2006) Influence of target gene mutations on survival, stage andhistology in sporadic microsatellite unstable colon cancers. Int J Cancer 118(10):2509-251320. Watanabe T, Wu TT, Catalano PJ, Ueki T, Satriano R, Haller DG, Benson AB, III,Hamilton SR (2001) Molecular predictors of survival after adjuvant chemotherapyfor colon cancer. N Engl J Med 344(16): 1196-120621. Samowitz WS, Curtin K, Neuhausen S, Schaffer D, Slattery ML (2002) Prognosticimplications of BAX and TGFBRII mutations in colon cancers withmicrosatellite instability. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 35(4): 368-37122. Lewis KA, Bakkum-Gamez J, Loewen R, French AJ, Thibodeau SN, Cliby WA (2007)Mutations in the ataxia telangiectasia and rad3-related-checkpoint kinase 1DNA damage response axis in colon cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 46(12):1061-106823. Nehls O, Okech T, Hsieh CJ, Enzinger T, Sarbia M, Borchard F, Gruenagel HH, GacoV, Hass HG, Arkenau HT, Hartmann JT, Porschen R, Gregor M, Klump B (2007)25
Page 1 and 2:
Novel genetic and epigenetic altera
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe present work ha
Page 7 and 8:
Prefacetechnology[3]. This new tech
Page 10 and 11:
SummaryThe subgroup of carcinomas w
Page 12 and 13:
Introduction“Epigenetic inheritan
Page 14 and 15:
Introductionamino acid change it is
Page 16 and 17:
Introductionmethylation during embr
Page 18 and 19:
IntroductionDNA is most of the time
Page 20 and 21:
IntroductionFigure 5. DNA methylati
Page 22 and 23:
IntroductionFigure 6. Incidence rat
Page 24 and 25:
IntroductionFigure 8. Tumor staging
Page 26 and 27:
Introductioninasmuch as 80% of colo
Page 28 and 29:
IntroductionInstabilities involved
Page 30 and 31:
Introductionthere seems to be a fid
Page 32 and 33:
Introductionsevere alterations are
Page 34 and 35:
Introductionpopulation-wide screeni
Page 36 and 37:
IntroductionFigure 12. Present and
Page 38 and 39:
RESULTS IN BRIEFPaper Ia. “DNA hy
Page 40 and 41:
Results in Briefinstability, and se
Page 42 and 43:
Results in BriefUnivariate survival
Page 44 and 45:
Discussionseveral factors, and full
Page 46 and 47:
Discussionlow threshold, we increas
Page 48 and 49:
DiscussionIt may seem like unnecess
Page 50 and 51:
Discussionthan 96% DHPLC do not sta
Page 52 and 53:
DiscussionFigure 13. Mutation detec
Page 54 and 55:
DiscussionClinical impact of molecu
Page 56 and 57:
Discussionmarkers with a very high
Page 58 and 59:
Discussionchromosomes in metaphase[
Page 60 and 61:
DiscussionThese examples underline
Page 62 and 63:
Discussiongenes. One is based on mu
Page 64 and 65:
CONCLUSIONSWe have identified novel
Page 66 and 67:
Future PerspectivesMolecular risk a
Page 68 and 69:
REFERENCES1. Breasted J (1930) The
Page 70 and 71:
References29. Deng G, Chen A, Pong
Page 72 and 73:
References57. Al-Sukhni W, Aronson
Page 74 and 75:
References84. Kunkel TA (1993) Nucl
Page 76 and 77:
ReferencesLeggett B, Levine J, Kim
Page 78 and 79:
References133. Lind GE, Thorstensen
Page 80 and 81:
References156. Meling GI, Lothe RA,
Page 82 and 83:
ReferencesT, Song X, Day RH, Sledzi
Page 84 and 85:
References196. Honda S, Haruta M, S
Page 86 and 87:
ORIGINAL ARTICLESAPPENDIXAppendix I
Page 89 and 90:
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2007;132:1631-1639
Page 91:
Paper IbGuro E Lind, Terje Ahlquist
Page 94 and 95:
Journal of Translational Medicine 2
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 105: Paper IITerje Ahlquist, Guro E Lind
Page 108 and 109: BackgroundMost cases of colorectal
Page 110 and 111: ADAMTS1 CDKN2A CRABP1 HOXA9 MAL MGM
Page 112 and 113: pseudogene, leading to a high rate
Page 114 and 115: strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1
Page 116 and 117: concomitant absence of transcript a
Page 119 and 120: Volume 10 Number 7 July 2008 pp. 68
Page 121 and 122: 682 RAS Signaling in Colorectal Car
Page 127: Table W2. Detailed Somatic Events o
Page 131 and 132: Identification of RCC2 as a prognos
Page 133 and 134: INTRODUCTIONMicrosatellite instabil
Page 135 and 136: unselected series of primary tumors
Page 137 and 138: specificity, i.e. that they only am
Page 139 and 140: On the assumption that DNA repair a
Page 141 and 142: In order to ensure that gene mutati
Page 143 and 144: Figure 2. Mutation frequency differ
Page 145 and 146: and TAF1B (0.50), ACVR2A and ASTE1
Page 147 and 148: Multivariate analysesA multivariate
Page 149 and 150: When comparing our findings of muta
Page 151 and 152: The test series included a low numb
Page 153: entering M-phase remains to be seen
Page 157 and 158: 34. Martineau-Thuillier S, Andreass
Page 159: AppendicesAppendix I:List of abbrev
Page 163 and 164: Critical Reviews TM in Oncogenesis,
Page 165 and 166: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
Page 191: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
show all

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?