Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

ous.research.no
from ous.research.no More from this publisher
11.07.2015 Views

DISCUSSIONColorectal cancer is a very common disease with a poor 5-year survival. Any finding whichaid in discriminating patients with a good versus poor prognosis will therefore have animpact on a large number of patients. Currently, tumor stage at time of diagnosis is the onlyparameter used in classifying patients into different categories, in which fit patients withstage III disease who will receive adjuvant chemotherapy.[15;16] Still, there are some patientswith a stage II disease who will experience recurrence, and who would benefit fromchemotherapy. On the other hand, some 50% of stage III patients will not recur aftersurgery alone and could be spared from the treatment related side-effects. With the aim offinding markers with prognostic potential in a low-risk group of colorectal cancer patients,we analyzed 41 genes with coding oligonucleotide repeats (all but one were mononucleotide)in two independent series of colorectal MSI tumors.This same approach has been performed in earlier studies, but in very small numbers of bothgenes and patients. Results are differing, some find mutations in both of TGFBR2 and BAXto be associated with poor prognosis,[17;18] another study finds them to be associated withan improved survival,[19;20] while some do not find any associations to survival at all.[21] Asmall study found that mutation in ATR showed a trend towards improved survival,although not significant.[22] A couple of studies have looked at protein expression of someof the genes included here in association to survival and found that low BAX expression isassociated with poor survival,[23] and that strong staining of RAD50/MRE11/NBS1 wasassociated with a favorable survival.[24] In order to include driver-genes that are likely tohave an impact on tumorigenesis in the study, strict selection criteria were employed.18

When comparing our findings of mutation frequencies with literature, we saw thatACVR2A, OGT and RAD50 had a higher mutation rate in our analyses, while ADCY2,EP300, PA2G4 and SEC63 were less frequently mutated as compared to the literature. Mostof these genes have been the subject of few or single studies, often with a very restrictedsample size, and therefore discrepancies were not unexpected. In the instance of ACVR2Aanother study has found a similarly high mutation frequency.[25] To the best of ourknowledge, this is the first study to analyze indels in EP300 in primary tumors. Previously ithas been shown to be mutated in 4 of 7 CRC cell lines.[26] The low mutation frequency seenhere indicates that it is not among the driving forces in colorectal tumorigenesis.Some genes showed more than a 10% difference in mutation frequency between the twotumor series (AIM2, ASTE1, EP300, EPHB2, MARCKS, PCNXL2, RBBP8, RCC2,SEMG1, SPINK5 and SYCP1). There may be biological as well as technological explanationsfor this discrepancy. Firstly, some biological variation is expected. Also, the fact that the testseries includes a higher number of non-right-sided tumors makes us expect the mutationfrequencies to be slightly lower. In fact, when comparing only right-sided tumors themutation frequencies in the two series were more similar as only SPINK5 and EP300 weresignificantly different. All of the differently mutated genes were more often mutated in theformalin fixed validation series. It may be that the tissue fixation protocol plays a part in theelevated mutation frequencies.Correlation analysis indicated that ACVR2A:TGFBR2, TAF1B:ASTE1, TAF1B:ACVR2A,and MRE11A:ASTE1 were correlated in the test series, of which the pairs of TAF1B:ACVR2A and MRE11A:ASTE1 were confirmed in the validation series. All these genes19

DISCUSSIONColorectal cancer is a very common disease with a poor 5-year survival. Any f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g whichaid <strong>in</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g patients with a good versus poor prog<strong>no</strong>sis will therefore have animpact on a large number of patients. Currently, tumor stage at time of diag<strong>no</strong>sis is the onlyparameter used <strong>in</strong> classify<strong>in</strong>g patients <strong>in</strong>to different categories, <strong>in</strong> which fit patients withstage III disease who will receive adjuvant chemotherapy.[15;16] Still, there are some patientswith a stage II disease who will experience recurrence, <strong>and</strong> who would benefit fromchemotherapy. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, some 50% of stage III patients will <strong>no</strong>t recur aftersurgery alone <strong>and</strong> could be spared from the treatment related side-effects. With the aim off<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g markers with prog<strong>no</strong>stic potential <strong>in</strong> a low-risk group of colorectal cancer patients,we analyzed 41 genes with cod<strong>in</strong>g oligonucleotide repeats (all but one were mo<strong>no</strong>nucleotide)<strong>in</strong> two <strong>in</strong>dependent series of colorectal MSI tumors.This same approach has been performed <strong>in</strong> earlier studies, but <strong>in</strong> very small numbers of bothgenes <strong>and</strong> patients. Results are differ<strong>in</strong>g, some f<strong>in</strong>d mutations <strong>in</strong> both of TGFBR2 <strong>and</strong> BAXto be associated with poor prog<strong>no</strong>sis,[17;18] a<strong>no</strong>ther study f<strong>in</strong>ds them to be associated withan improved survival,[19;20] while some do <strong>no</strong>t f<strong>in</strong>d any associations to survival at all.[21] Asmall study found that mutation <strong>in</strong> ATR showed a trend towards improved survival,although <strong>no</strong>t significant.[22] A couple of studies have looked at prote<strong>in</strong> expression of someof the genes <strong>in</strong>cluded here <strong>in</strong> association to survival <strong>and</strong> found that low BAX expression isassociated with poor survival,[23] <strong>and</strong> that strong sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of RAD50/MRE11/NBS1 wasassociated with a favorable survival.[24] In order to <strong>in</strong>clude driver-genes that are likely tohave an impact on tumorigenesis <strong>in</strong> the study, strict selection criteria were employed.18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!