Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no
Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no
up with ExoSAP-IT (USB Corporation, Ohio, USA) and sequencing PCR using BigDye®Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) following the producer’sinstructions. Forward and reverse sequences were analyzed and compared with the genomicreference sequences. For primer details please see supplementary table.Selection of target genesA literature search was performed in order to survey known putative target genes, as alreadyreported.[10] From the 162 genes identified we applied different criteria in order tomaximize the genes with a possible impact on tumorigenesis which in turn will have a higherprobability of determining patient survival.For the initial selection a minimum cut-off mutation frequency of 15% across all tumortypes was chosen following the assessed background mutation level 12-13%.[8;12] To as faras possible ensure that the given mutation frequency was representative, this criterion wascoupled to a requirement of the existence of at least two studies of minimum twenty sampleseach, and a minimum of one hundred samples across all studies. These criteria returned 23genes.In order to include additional molecular markers a second set was defined. This included aminimum observed mutation frequency for the gene of 30%, a minimum of one study oftwenty tumor samples, and involvement in one of the following categories, which were inpart based on Hanahan and Weinberg’s acquired capabilities of cancer: DNA repair, cellsignaling, apoptosis, cell cycle, transcription or angiogenesis.[13]8
On the assumption that DNA repair and cell cycle genes significantly influence thedevelopment and prognosis of MSI tumors, genes falling into these categories were sortedaccording to mutation frequency, and those displaying mutations in over 15% of sampleswere included regardless of sample number. Finally, genes that are considered by Woerner etal. to be true target genes in MSI CRC were included,[14] resulting in a total of 41 genes.Statistics2 x 2 contingency tables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. 3 x 2 tables were analyzed bythe Pearson 2 test. Due to a low number of samples, Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon test wasperformed to evaluate the difference in total number of mutations in the right-sided andrectal tumors. An independent T-test was performed when comparing continuous normallydistributed data between two groups. Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance was usedto test the equality of mutation frequencies among the test and validation series as well as theliterature.Five year disease-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots, and the Breslow testwas used to compare the equality of the survival functions. Cox regression for multivariateanalyses was used to determine the parameters with the greatest impact on survival. P-valuesform the likelihood ratio test was used. Disease-free survival was defined as the time fromdiagnose to the first event of either death from disease, locally recurrent disease or distantmetastasis, while death from other reasons and death from surgery were censored. All Pvalues were derived from statistical tests using the SPSS 15.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL,USA), and considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.9
- Page 89 and 90: GASTROENTEROLOGY 2007;132:1631-1639
- Page 91: Paper IbGuro E Lind, Terje Ahlquist
- Page 94 and 95: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 96 and 97: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 98 and 99: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 100 and 101: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 102 and 103: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 105: Paper IITerje Ahlquist, Guro E Lind
- Page 108 and 109: BackgroundMost cases of colorectal
- Page 110 and 111: ADAMTS1 CDKN2A CRABP1 HOXA9 MAL MGM
- Page 112 and 113: pseudogene, leading to a high rate
- Page 114 and 115: strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1
- Page 116 and 117: concomitant absence of transcript a
- Page 119 and 120: Volume 10 Number 7 July 2008 pp. 68
- Page 121 and 122: 682 RAS Signaling in Colorectal Car
- Page 123 and 124: 684 RAS Signaling in Colorectal Car
- Page 125 and 126: 686 RAS Signaling in Colorectal Car
- Page 127: Table W2. Detailed Somatic Events o
- Page 131 and 132: Identification of RCC2 as a prognos
- Page 133 and 134: INTRODUCTIONMicrosatellite instabil
- Page 135 and 136: unselected series of primary tumors
- Page 137: specificity, i.e. that they only am
- Page 141 and 142: In order to ensure that gene mutati
- Page 143 and 144: Figure 2. Mutation frequency differ
- Page 145 and 146: and TAF1B (0.50), ACVR2A and ASTE1
- Page 147 and 148: Multivariate analysesA multivariate
- Page 149 and 150: When comparing our findings of muta
- Page 151 and 152: The test series included a low numb
- Page 153 and 154: entering M-phase remains to be seen
- Page 155 and 156: 12. Duval A, Reperant M, Hamelin R
- Page 157 and 158: 34. Martineau-Thuillier S, Andreass
- Page 159: AppendicesAppendix I:List of abbrev
- Page 163 and 164: Critical Reviews TM in Oncogenesis,
- Page 165 and 166: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 167 and 168: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 169 and 170: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 171 and 172: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 173 and 174: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 175 and 176: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 177 and 178: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 179 and 180: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 181 and 182: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 183 and 184: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 185 and 186: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 187 and 188: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
up with ExoSAP-IT (USB Corporation, Ohio, USA) <strong>and</strong> sequenc<strong>in</strong>g PCR us<strong>in</strong>g BigDye®Term<strong>in</strong>ator v1.1 Cycle Sequenc<strong>in</strong>g Kit (Applied Biosystems) follow<strong>in</strong>g the producer’s<strong>in</strong>structions. Forward <strong>and</strong> reverse sequences were analyzed <strong>and</strong> compared with the ge<strong>no</strong>micreference sequences. For primer details please see supplementary table.Selection of target genesA literature search was performed <strong>in</strong> order to survey k<strong>no</strong>wn putative target genes, as alreadyreported.[10] From the 162 genes identified we applied different criteria <strong>in</strong> order tomaximize the genes with a possible impact on tumorigenesis which <strong>in</strong> turn will have a higherprobability of determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g patient survival.For the <strong>in</strong>itial selection a m<strong>in</strong>imum cut-off mutation frequency of 15% across all tumortypes was chosen follow<strong>in</strong>g the assessed background mutation level 12-13%.[8;12] To as faras possible ensure that the given mutation frequency was representative, this criterion wascoupled to a requirement of the existence of at least two studies of m<strong>in</strong>imum twenty sampleseach, <strong>and</strong> a m<strong>in</strong>imum of one hundred samples across all studies. These criteria returned 23genes.In order to <strong>in</strong>clude additional molecular markers a second set was def<strong>in</strong>ed. This <strong>in</strong>cluded am<strong>in</strong>imum observed mutation frequency for the gene of 30%, a m<strong>in</strong>imum of one study oftwenty tumor samples, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> one of the follow<strong>in</strong>g categories, which were <strong>in</strong>part based on Hanahan <strong>and</strong> We<strong>in</strong>berg’s acquired capabilities of cancer: DNA repair, cellsignal<strong>in</strong>g, apoptosis, cell cycle, transcription or angiogenesis.[13]8