11.07.2015 Views

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

Novel genetic and epigenetic alterations in ... - Ous-research.no

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

684 RAS Signal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Colorectal Carc<strong>in</strong>omas Ahlquist et al. Neoplasia Vol. 10, No. 7, 2008(P = .03), overlapp<strong>in</strong>g with the MSI. Three of the four duplicationsfound <strong>in</strong> the NF1 locus occurred <strong>in</strong> tumors with wild typeBRAF <strong>and</strong> KRAS. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g tumor had both a KRAS mutation<strong>and</strong> duplication.The occurrence of RASSF1A hypermethylation <strong>in</strong> the presence ofother mutations did <strong>no</strong>t show any trends toward coexistence or mutuallyexclusive nature.Taken together, we found that 74% (48/65) of the tumors had a<strong>no</strong>veractive RAS signal<strong>in</strong>g pathway due to change of at least one of thefour analyzed components (one alteration <strong>in</strong> 37/48, two <strong>alterations</strong> <strong>in</strong>10/48, <strong>and</strong> three <strong>alterations</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1/48). For the 24 samples submitted forcomplete analyses, the number of samples with at least one alterationwas 19 (79%): one alteration was seen <strong>in</strong> 14 samples, two <strong>alterations</strong>were seen <strong>in</strong> 4 samples, <strong>and</strong> three <strong>alterations</strong> were seen <strong>in</strong> 1 sample. Allsamples <strong>and</strong> <strong>alterations</strong> are summarized <strong>in</strong> Figure 2 <strong>and</strong> Table W2.DiscussionThis is the first report with an extensive analysis of the role of NF1mutations <strong>in</strong> colorectal tumorigenesis. Previous mutation studieshave only looked at a small number of samples, usually <strong>in</strong> a limitedpart of the gene, <strong>in</strong> the RAS–GAP doma<strong>in</strong>. The <strong>in</strong>itial mutationalreport on NF1 showed that 1 of 22 colorectal ade<strong>no</strong>carc<strong>in</strong>omas harboreda mutation <strong>in</strong> the RAS–GAP doma<strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>gle-str<strong>and</strong> conformationpolymorphism [9]. A<strong>no</strong>ther study of 10 colorectal celll<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> 4 sporadic tumors us<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong> truncation test disclosedmutations <strong>in</strong> the NF1 cod<strong>in</strong>g region <strong>in</strong> four MSI cell l<strong>in</strong>es (40%)<strong>and</strong> one MSI tumor (25%). Two of the cell l<strong>in</strong>es had <strong>in</strong> fact twomutations each [22]. A recent study exam<strong>in</strong>ed five hereditary <strong>no</strong>npolyposisCRC patients for mutations <strong>in</strong> five exons <strong>and</strong> found a mutation<strong>in</strong> one (20%) of the patients who had a homozygous germl<strong>in</strong>emutation of MLH1 [23]. Moreover, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) atloci with<strong>in</strong> the NF1 gene have been shown <strong>in</strong> primary colorectal tumors(range, 14–57%) [24,25]. One of these studies also used realtimeexpression studies of NF1 <strong>in</strong> 55 of the carc<strong>in</strong>omas <strong>and</strong> found anFigure 2. Alterations across the sample series. The pie chart <strong>in</strong>dicatesthe four analyzed components <strong>and</strong> the percentage of tumorswhich showed <strong>alterations</strong> among these. Clockwise fromthe wild type pie, we see <strong>alterations</strong> <strong>in</strong> RASSF1A <strong>and</strong> BRAF; BRAF;BRAF <strong>and</strong> NF1; NF1; NF1 <strong>and</strong> KRAS; KRAS; KRAS <strong>and</strong> RASSF1A;RASSF1A; RASSF1A, NF1 <strong>and</strong> BRAF.<strong>in</strong>creased expression among tumors compared with <strong>no</strong>rmal colon tissue.In the COSMIC database [26], 79 carc<strong>in</strong>omas of the colorectumwere apparently <strong>in</strong>cluded among the NF1 data, yield<strong>in</strong>g a mutationfrequency of 11%. However, seven of n<strong>in</strong>e mutations reported werefrom one study <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g seven cell l<strong>in</strong>es, leav<strong>in</strong>g only two of the mutationsoccurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sporadic primary tumors.In this study, we found the NF1 mutation profile to be <strong>in</strong> contrastto published germl<strong>in</strong>e mutation profile of NF1 patients 3 as well as tothe somatic mutation profiles of malignant peripheral nerve sheathtumor taken from patients with <strong>and</strong> without the NF1 disease [27,28](Bottillo I et al., unpublished observations). Furthermore, the medianage of the patients <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the present CRC series is old, suggest<strong>in</strong>gthat potential NF1 carriers among them should have shown adebut of an NF1-associated cancer type. As <strong>no</strong> typical NF1-associatedtumors are recorded, based on written questionnaires <strong>and</strong> confirmatio<strong>no</strong>f cancer diag<strong>no</strong>ses from the Norwegian Cancer Registry [17],it further support that the reported mutations are somatic. The observed<strong>in</strong>tronic mutations prevail<strong>in</strong>g among the colorectal tumorscould be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> alternative splic<strong>in</strong>g but this rema<strong>in</strong>s to be elucidated.Four of the n<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>tronic mutations were <strong>in</strong>dels of one or twobases <strong>in</strong> microsatellites <strong>and</strong> reflect replication slippage (which often occurs<strong>in</strong> such repetitive stretches of bases) left unrepaired by the defectiveDNA mismatch repair system [29]. No such <strong>in</strong>dels were found <strong>in</strong>KRAS or BRAF.Multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification results showedthat 17% of the analyzed samples had ga<strong>in</strong>ed parts of or whole ofthe NF1 gene. This is <strong>no</strong>t <strong>in</strong> accordance with the expectations of atumor suppressor gene <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> tumorigenesis. A duplication ofNF1 could lead to a stronger negative regulation of KRAS, with subsequentstronger control of proliferation <strong>and</strong> differentiation. The duplicationsmay arise as a consequence of the chromosomal <strong>in</strong>stabilitypresent <strong>in</strong> three of the four tumors, which yield a wide range of ga<strong>in</strong>s<strong>and</strong> losses of whole or parts of chromosomes. As reported by Ĉaĉevet al. [30], colorectal tumors show a significant <strong>in</strong>crease of NF1 mRNAexpression compared with correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>no</strong>rmal tissue. They alsoshowed that the expression of NF1 isoform I (lack<strong>in</strong>g exon 23a, located<strong>in</strong> the middle of the RAS-GRD doma<strong>in</strong>) was significantly higher <strong>in</strong>tumor compared with <strong>no</strong>rmal tissue [30]. As of this, the present f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsare <strong>in</strong> agreement with those of the study by Ĉaĉev et al. [30].We also found a 40% mutation frequency of KRAS,whichiswith<strong>in</strong>the expected range [26]. A mutated KRAS (<strong>in</strong> codons 12, 13, <strong>and</strong> 61)h<strong>in</strong>ders the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP, <strong>and</strong> will keep KRAS <strong>in</strong> a constitutivelyactive state, lead<strong>in</strong>g to phosphorylation of downstream effectorssuch as BRAF [31]. BRAF mutations are k<strong>no</strong>wn to be stronglyassociated with MSI <strong>and</strong> CpG isl<strong>and</strong> methylator phe<strong>no</strong>type [32,33]<strong>and</strong> are found very often mutated <strong>in</strong> sessile-serrated ade<strong>no</strong>mas, lesionsoften considered as a precursor of MSI-H tumors [34–38]. We foundBRAF mutation <strong>in</strong> 22% of the samples, a higher frequency than <strong>in</strong>the mutation databases [26]. This reflects a bias due to the enrichmentof MSI tumors <strong>in</strong> the present series. In one study, 71% of theMSI tumors had a V600E mutation <strong>in</strong> BRAF, as opposed to 7% <strong>in</strong>the chromosomal-unstable tumors [39], a figure comparable with thepresent series, as 18 (62%) of 29 of MSI tumors had BRAF mutations.The most common BRAF mutation, V600E, just as the commonKRAS mutations, will lead to a constitutively active prote<strong>in</strong>, asthe activation loop of the prote<strong>in</strong> is changed [31].3 NF1 International Mutation Database (http://www.nfmutation.org).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!