Neoplasia Vol. 10, No. 7, 2008 RAS Signal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Colorectal Carc<strong>in</strong>omas Ahlquist et al. 681oncogene s<strong>in</strong>ce its first mutational report <strong>in</strong> 1984 [3], <strong>and</strong> it is <strong>no</strong>wk<strong>no</strong>wn that it is mutated <strong>in</strong> 21% of all human sporadic cancers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gone third of CRCs [1]. 2 BRAF was shown to be a mutationaltarget <strong>in</strong> cancer 5 years ago [4], <strong>and</strong> 20% of all human cancers harborsa mutation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g an estimated 13% of colorectal carc<strong>in</strong>omas.2 A<strong>no</strong>ther potential target of this pathway is the NF1 gene,which encodes neurofibromatosis type 1, a GTPase-activat<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong>(GAP), govern<strong>in</strong>g hydrolysis of KRAS-GTP to KRAS-GDP[5], thereby function<strong>in</strong>g as a negative regulator of KRAS signal<strong>in</strong>g.The NF1 gene is approximately 280 kb <strong>in</strong> size <strong>and</strong> maps to chromosome17q11.2. It conta<strong>in</strong>s 61 exons, with an 11- to 13-kb transcript<strong>and</strong> an open read<strong>in</strong>g frame cod<strong>in</strong>g for 2818 am<strong>in</strong>o acids. There aretwo catalytical doma<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> NF1, which are important for its function,namely, the cAMP/PKA doma<strong>in</strong> compris<strong>in</strong>g exons 11 to 17 <strong>and</strong> theRAS-GRD (RAS GAP-related doma<strong>in</strong>) doma<strong>in</strong> compris<strong>in</strong>g exons21 to 27a [6–8]. Neurofibromatosis type 1, a dom<strong>in</strong>ant disorder,is caused by mutations <strong>in</strong> NF1, but somatic mutations <strong>in</strong> this genecan also contribute to tumorigenesis. S<strong>in</strong>ce the first mutation reportof the gene <strong>in</strong> 1992 show<strong>in</strong>g that one colorectal tumor (of 22) wasmutated <strong>in</strong> NF1 [9], it has been speculated to play a role <strong>in</strong> colorectaltumorigenesis. However, due to the large size of the gene <strong>and</strong> thefact that there are <strong>no</strong> mutational hot spots, mutation analysis ofNF1 <strong>in</strong> tumors has been very scarce. RASSF1 (Ras association doma<strong>in</strong>family 1) gene maps at chromosome 3p21.3, <strong>and</strong> its isoformA(RASSF1A) has been found hypermethylated <strong>in</strong> 40% of lung tumors[10] <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> a large variety of human cancers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g CRC[11,12]. As implied by its designation, RASSF1A is thought to <strong>in</strong>teractwith KRAS through a Ras association doma<strong>in</strong> that alters itseffects. RASSF1A has several effects, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g promotion of apoptosis,cell cycle arrest, <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of ge<strong>no</strong>mic stability, abilitiestypical of tumor suppressor genes. Some of these effects refer tothe negative regulation of KRAS [13]. Its association to, <strong>and</strong> its effecton, KRAS is still <strong>no</strong>t solved, although <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g evidence po<strong>in</strong>ts to adirect b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g between RASSF1A <strong>and</strong> farnesylated KRAS (reviewed<strong>in</strong> the study of Donn<strong>in</strong>ger et al. [11]). The KRAS <strong>and</strong> BRAF mutationstatus together with the alteration of other upstream componentsaffect<strong>in</strong>g the RAS signal<strong>in</strong>g have been reported for othercancers [14], but only two previous studies have exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>alterations</strong><strong>in</strong> KRAS, BRAF, <strong>and</strong> RASSF1A <strong>in</strong> the same series of colorectal neoplasms[15,16], <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent of cancer type, <strong>no</strong> previous studyhas <strong>in</strong>cluded a detailed analyses of the NF1 gene.To provide further <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the role of MAP k<strong>in</strong>ase signal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>CRC, we carried out the first comprehensive mutation analyses ofthe NF1 gene <strong>in</strong> colorectal carc<strong>in</strong>omas <strong>in</strong> comparison with <strong>alterations</strong>of BRAF, KRAS, <strong>and</strong> RASSF1A <strong>in</strong> a sample series selected to <strong>in</strong>clude acomparable number of samples with <strong>and</strong> without the microsatellite<strong>in</strong>stability phe<strong>no</strong>type.samples displayed microsatellite <strong>in</strong>stability (MSI), whereas 36 weremicrosatellite-stable (MSS). All tumors were <strong>no</strong>nfamilial as assessedby written questionnaires <strong>and</strong> cross check with the Norwegian CancerRegistry [17]. The colon, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the rectum, was divided <strong>in</strong>toproximal <strong>and</strong> distal sections: the proximal, or right side, spans fromcecum to two thirds of the way across transversum; the distal, or leftside, comprises the last third of the transversum, sigmoideum, <strong>and</strong>the rectum. Of the 65 samples, 23 were located <strong>in</strong> the proximalcolon <strong>and</strong> 42 were located <strong>in</strong> the distal colon. The carc<strong>in</strong>omas arefrom a prospective series collected from seven hospitals <strong>in</strong> the Southeastregion of Norway dur<strong>in</strong>g 1987–1989 <strong>and</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>, on average,84% tumor cells [18]. The tumors have been selected to achievea consistently higher number of MSI-positive tumors compared tothe <strong>no</strong>rmal distribution (15%). By stratify<strong>in</strong>g the samples accord<strong>in</strong>gto the MSI status, we ensured that any results associated with theMSI or MSS group would be detected.NF1 Mutation Screen<strong>in</strong>g — DNA Amplification<strong>and</strong> Denatur<strong>in</strong>g High-Performance LiquidChromatography AnalysisTwenty-four representative CRC samples were analyzed for mutations<strong>in</strong> the NF1 gene. These samples were selected to resemble therema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g series with regards to sex, age, tumor location, MSI status,<strong>and</strong> KRAS <strong>and</strong> BRAF mutation status. The 61 NF1 gene exons wereamplified <strong>in</strong> 61 polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction (PCR) fragments of 172to 579 bp. The primers were generally positioned approximately 50to 60 bp from the <strong>in</strong>tron–exon boundary to allow the detection ofsplic<strong>in</strong>g defects while m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tronic polymorphisms. In total,19,843 bases were screened per sample to obta<strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al mutationstatus. The dHPLC was carried out as previously published[19], with m<strong>in</strong>or <strong>alterations</strong> <strong>in</strong> the PCR protocol <strong>and</strong> denatur<strong>in</strong>ghigh-performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) methods. Fordetails concern<strong>in</strong>g the dHPLC, please refer to Table W1.In short, the <strong>in</strong>itial PCR was carried out <strong>in</strong> 25 μl of reaction volumes<strong>and</strong> was cooled at room temperature for 60 m<strong>in</strong>utes to yieldheteroduplex formation. The identification of somatic NF1 gene mutationswas carried out with dHPLC on a 3500HT WAVE DNAfragment analysis system (Transge<strong>no</strong>mic, Crewe, UK) equipped witha DNASep column (Transge<strong>no</strong>mic). Polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction productswere exam<strong>in</strong>ed through a 5% l<strong>in</strong>ear acetonitrile gradient forheteroduplexes with a separation flow rate of 1.5 ml/m<strong>in</strong>. Commerciallyavailable WAVE Optimized Buffers (A, B, <strong>and</strong> D; Transge<strong>no</strong>mic)<strong>and</strong> Syr<strong>in</strong>ge Solution (Transge<strong>no</strong>mic) were used to provide highly reproducibleretention times with WAVE System <strong>in</strong>strumentation. Resolutiontemperatures <strong>and</strong> start<strong>in</strong>g concentrations of buffer B fordHPLC analysis are reported <strong>in</strong> Table W1.Materials <strong>and</strong> MethodsTissue SpecimenSixty-five sporadic colorectal carc<strong>in</strong>omas from 64 patients with amean age of 70 years (range 33–92 years), <strong>and</strong> an equal distributio<strong>no</strong>f male–female were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the present study. Twenty-n<strong>in</strong>e2 Sanger Institute — Catalogue of Somatic Mutations <strong>in</strong> Cancer (COSMIC) Web site.Sequenc<strong>in</strong>gFor each dHPLC ab<strong>no</strong>rmal elution profile, ge<strong>no</strong>mic DNA wasreamplified with dHPLC primers <strong>and</strong> directly sequenced <strong>in</strong> both directionson a 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City,CA). Forward <strong>and</strong> reverse sequences were analyzed <strong>and</strong> compared withthe mRNA reference sequence <strong>and</strong> with the chromosome 17 ge<strong>no</strong>miccontig reference sequence (NM_000267). The first base (position +1)of the <strong>in</strong>itiator methion<strong>in</strong>e is taken as the start of the cDNA. All missense<strong>and</strong> splic<strong>in</strong>g mutations detected were absent on 200 controlchromosomes belong<strong>in</strong>g to the unaffected subjects.
682 RAS Signal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Colorectal Carc<strong>in</strong>omas Ahlquist et al. Neoplasia Vol. 10, No. 7, 2008KRAS <strong>and</strong> BRAF Mutation Screen<strong>in</strong>gThe mutational hot spots of KRAS (exons 2 <strong>and</strong> 3) <strong>and</strong> BRAF(exons 11 <strong>and</strong> 15) were directly sequenced <strong>in</strong> both directions forall samples (n = 65) on an ABI PRISM 377 DNA Sequencer (AppliedBiosystems) <strong>and</strong> an ABI PRISM 3730 DNA Sequencer (AppliedBiosystems). All nucleotide numbers are based on the cDNAreference sequence (BRAF, GenBank Accession No. NM_004333;KRAS, GenBank Accession No. NM_004985). For primer detailsplease see Table W1.Methylation-Specific PCR of RASSF1AMethylation-specific PCR (MSP) of RASSF1A were performedwith published primers [20]. Polymerase cha<strong>in</strong> reaction conditionswere as follows: denaturation <strong>and</strong> enzyme activation at 95°C for15 m<strong>in</strong>utes; 35 cycles of 30 seconds of denaturation at 95°C, 30 secondsof anneal<strong>in</strong>g at 62°C, <strong>and</strong> 30 seconds of elongation at 72°C;f<strong>in</strong>al extension at 72°C for 7 m<strong>in</strong>utes.Human placental DNA (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO)treated <strong>in</strong> vitro with SssI methyltransferase (New Engl<strong>and</strong> BiolabsInc., Beverly, MA) was used as a positive control for MSP of methylatedalleles, whereas DNA from <strong>no</strong>rmal lymphocytes was used as acontrol for unmethylated alleles. The PCR products were separatedus<strong>in</strong>g a 2% agarose gel before <strong>in</strong>dividual visual scor<strong>in</strong>g by two people.Methylated samples with <strong>in</strong>tensity equal to, or higher than, the positivecontrol were considered to be hypermethylated.Multiple Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification AnalysisScreen<strong>in</strong>g for NF1 s<strong>in</strong>gle- <strong>and</strong> multiexon deletions was carried out<strong>in</strong> 24 of the colorectal carc<strong>in</strong>omas us<strong>in</strong>g the SALSA P081/082 NF1(version 04, 05-02-2005) multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification(MLPA) assay (MRC Holl<strong>and</strong>, Amsterdam, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s),as <strong>in</strong>structed by the manufacturer <strong>and</strong> previously reported[21]. In brief, two probes <strong>in</strong> each exon were hybridized to the <strong>in</strong>dividualtumor DNA, followed by a ligation of the nick between theprobes, <strong>and</strong> PCR amplification with 6-FAM–labeled universal primers.The amplified product was analyzed on an ABI PRISM3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems), <strong>and</strong> the results wereexported to Coffalyzer v.5 Software (MRC Holl<strong>and</strong>). As controls,<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> each experiment, we used five <strong>no</strong>rmal blood samples takenfrom healthy <strong>in</strong>dividuals who do <strong>no</strong>t show NF1 phe<strong>no</strong>typic traitsas determ<strong>in</strong>ed by cl<strong>in</strong>ical evaluation. Furthermore, these controlsare verified to have an unaltered NF1, both at the nucleotide <strong>and</strong>at the copy number level. A ratio of ∼1 should be obta<strong>in</strong>ed if bothalleles are present. A reduction or <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the peak area values to1.3 was considered an <strong>in</strong>dication of a deletion or a ga<strong>in</strong>,respectively. DNA samples show<strong>in</strong>g a reduction or <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> theMLPA peak area accord<strong>in</strong>g to the chosen threshold values were reanalyzedby MLPA, <strong>and</strong> only the samples show<strong>in</strong>g consistent resultsbetween the two experiments were scored as deleted or ga<strong>in</strong>ed.Real-Time Polymerase Cha<strong>in</strong> ReactionThe gene ga<strong>in</strong>s identified by MLPA were also confirmed with aTaqMan Real-Time PCR experiment us<strong>in</strong>g an ABI 7000 SequenceDetection System (Applied Biosystems). Two TaqMan probes mapp<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> NF1 exons 25 <strong>and</strong> 28, respectively, were designed by FileBuilder 3.1 software (Applied Biosystems). These were amplified separatelytogether with the endoge<strong>no</strong>us control (RNaseP) <strong>in</strong> 96-well fastplates follow<strong>in</strong>g the recommended protocol (Applied Biosystems). Allsamples were analyzed <strong>in</strong> parallel, <strong>and</strong> the mean value was used fordata analysis. In cases where N -fold was below the maximum N -foldcopy number observed among the <strong>no</strong>ndeleted DNA used as negativecontrols, it was accepted that the test sample harbored one copy ofthe target gene. In cases where N -fold resulted above the m<strong>in</strong>imumN -fold copy number observed among the <strong>no</strong>ndeleted DNA, it wasaccepted that the test sample harbored two or more copies of the targetgene.StatisticsFor this study, 2 × 2 cont<strong>in</strong>gency tables were analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g Fisher’sexact test, whereas 3 × 2 tables were analyzed by the Pearson chisquaretest. An <strong>in</strong>dependent t test was performed when compar<strong>in</strong>gcont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>no</strong>rmally distributed data between two groups. All P valueswere derived from statistical tests us<strong>in</strong>g the SPSS Version 15.0software (SPSS, Chicago, IL), <strong>and</strong> considered statistically significantat P ≤ .05.ResultsNF1One of the 24 carc<strong>in</strong>omas conta<strong>in</strong>ed two missense mutations(D1302Y <strong>and</strong> V2577G), the first located with<strong>in</strong> the RAS-GRD doma<strong>in</strong>.In silico prote<strong>in</strong> model<strong>in</strong>g showed that D1302Y has lost an exposednegative charge, which may be important <strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> fold<strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to other prote<strong>in</strong>s. The V2577G most likely has <strong>no</strong>effect on the neurofibrom<strong>in</strong> function. Additional n<strong>in</strong>e tumors displayed<strong>in</strong>tronic mutations <strong>in</strong> the range of 4 to 57 bases away fromthe <strong>in</strong>tron–exon boundary (Table W2).Us<strong>in</strong>g MLPA, we found that a<strong>no</strong>ther 4 (17%) of 24 samples had aga<strong>in</strong> of parts or of the whole gene, also confirmed with real-timeanalysis (Table W2).Comparison of the molecular results with cl<strong>in</strong>icopathologic datashowed that 8 of 10 samples with exonic or <strong>in</strong>tronic <strong>alterations</strong> <strong>in</strong>NF1 occurred <strong>in</strong> MSI-positive tumors (P = .047), whereas 3 of 4 duplicationsoccurred <strong>in</strong> MSS tumors.KRASDirect sequenc<strong>in</strong>g of exons 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 of KRAS revealed that 26(40%) of 65 tumors harbored a mutation (Table W2). All but twomutations were missense mutations <strong>and</strong> occurred <strong>in</strong> codon 12, 13, or61. These two were a 3-bp <strong>in</strong>sertion (TGG) <strong>in</strong> exon 2 (c.49<strong>in</strong>sTGG)<strong>and</strong> a 3-bp deletion <strong>in</strong> exon 3, codons 62 to 63 (c.184_189delGAG;Table W2). Furthermore, two of the tumors had two KRAS mutationseach. One displayed both G12A <strong>and</strong> V14I mutations, <strong>and</strong>the second had both G12D <strong>and</strong> G13D.Mutations <strong>in</strong> KRAS were seem<strong>in</strong>gly more often present <strong>in</strong> MSStumors than <strong>in</strong> MSI tumors, 69% versus 46% (P = .08).BRAFMutational analysis of BRAF gene revealed that 14 (22%) of 64samples harbored a mutation. Eleven of these were the typicalV600E mutation; the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g three were D594G, L597Q, <strong>and</strong>G1406C (Table W2).Mutations <strong>in</strong> BRAF were strongly associated to MSI, female gender,<strong>and</strong> proximal location (P =.006,P = .015, <strong>and</strong> P = .025, respectively).Figure 1 illustrates the <strong>in</strong>dividual localization of each mutation <strong>in</strong>KRAS, BRAF, <strong>and</strong>NF1.
- Page 1 and 2:
Novel genetic and epigenetic altera
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe present work ha
- Page 7 and 8:
Prefacetechnology[3]. This new tech
- Page 10 and 11:
SummaryThe subgroup of carcinomas w
- Page 12 and 13:
Introduction“Epigenetic inheritan
- Page 14 and 15:
Introductionamino acid change it is
- Page 16 and 17:
Introductionmethylation during embr
- Page 18 and 19:
IntroductionDNA is most of the time
- Page 20 and 21:
IntroductionFigure 5. DNA methylati
- Page 22 and 23:
IntroductionFigure 6. Incidence rat
- Page 24 and 25:
IntroductionFigure 8. Tumor staging
- Page 26 and 27:
Introductioninasmuch as 80% of colo
- Page 28 and 29:
IntroductionInstabilities involved
- Page 30 and 31:
Introductionthere seems to be a fid
- Page 32 and 33:
Introductionsevere alterations are
- Page 34 and 35:
Introductionpopulation-wide screeni
- Page 36 and 37:
IntroductionFigure 12. Present and
- Page 38 and 39:
RESULTS IN BRIEFPaper Ia. “DNA hy
- Page 40 and 41:
Results in Briefinstability, and se
- Page 42 and 43:
Results in BriefUnivariate survival
- Page 44 and 45:
Discussionseveral factors, and full
- Page 46 and 47:
Discussionlow threshold, we increas
- Page 48 and 49:
DiscussionIt may seem like unnecess
- Page 50 and 51:
Discussionthan 96% DHPLC do not sta
- Page 52 and 53:
DiscussionFigure 13. Mutation detec
- Page 54 and 55:
DiscussionClinical impact of molecu
- Page 56 and 57:
Discussionmarkers with a very high
- Page 58 and 59:
Discussionchromosomes in metaphase[
- Page 60 and 61:
DiscussionThese examples underline
- Page 62 and 63:
Discussiongenes. One is based on mu
- Page 64 and 65:
CONCLUSIONSWe have identified novel
- Page 66 and 67:
Future PerspectivesMolecular risk a
- Page 68 and 69:
REFERENCES1. Breasted J (1930) The
- Page 70 and 71: References29. Deng G, Chen A, Pong
- Page 72 and 73: References57. Al-Sukhni W, Aronson
- Page 74 and 75: References84. Kunkel TA (1993) Nucl
- Page 76 and 77: ReferencesLeggett B, Levine J, Kim
- Page 78 and 79: References133. Lind GE, Thorstensen
- Page 80 and 81: References156. Meling GI, Lothe RA,
- Page 82 and 83: ReferencesT, Song X, Day RH, Sledzi
- Page 84 and 85: References196. Honda S, Haruta M, S
- Page 86 and 87: ORIGINAL ARTICLESAPPENDIXAppendix I
- Page 89 and 90: GASTROENTEROLOGY 2007;132:1631-1639
- Page 91: Paper IbGuro E Lind, Terje Ahlquist
- Page 94 and 95: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 96 and 97: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 98 and 99: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 100 and 101: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 102 and 103: Journal of Translational Medicine 2
- Page 105: Paper IITerje Ahlquist, Guro E Lind
- Page 108 and 109: BackgroundMost cases of colorectal
- Page 110 and 111: ADAMTS1 CDKN2A CRABP1 HOXA9 MAL MGM
- Page 112 and 113: pseudogene, leading to a high rate
- Page 114 and 115: strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1
- Page 116 and 117: concomitant absence of transcript a
- Page 119: Volume 10 Number 7 July 2008 pp. 68
- Page 123 and 124: 684 RAS Signaling in Colorectal Car
- Page 125 and 126: 686 RAS Signaling in Colorectal Car
- Page 127: Table W2. Detailed Somatic Events o
- Page 131 and 132: Identification of RCC2 as a prognos
- Page 133 and 134: INTRODUCTIONMicrosatellite instabil
- Page 135 and 136: unselected series of primary tumors
- Page 137 and 138: specificity, i.e. that they only am
- Page 139 and 140: On the assumption that DNA repair a
- Page 141 and 142: In order to ensure that gene mutati
- Page 143 and 144: Figure 2. Mutation frequency differ
- Page 145 and 146: and TAF1B (0.50), ACVR2A and ASTE1
- Page 147 and 148: Multivariate analysesA multivariate
- Page 149 and 150: When comparing our findings of muta
- Page 151 and 152: The test series included a low numb
- Page 153 and 154: entering M-phase remains to be seen
- Page 155 and 156: 12. Duval A, Reperant M, Hamelin R
- Page 157 and 158: 34. Martineau-Thuillier S, Andreass
- Page 159: AppendicesAppendix I:List of abbrev
- Page 163 and 164: Critical Reviews TM in Oncogenesis,
- Page 165 and 166: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 167 and 168: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 169 and 170: TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 171 and 172:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 173 and 174:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 175 and 176:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 177 and 178:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 179 and 180:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 181 and 182:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 183 and 184:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 185 and 186:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 187 and 188:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 189 and 190:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC
- Page 191:
TARGET GENES OF MSI COLORECTAL CANC