Full Report - Knight Program in Community Building
Full Report - Knight Program in Community Building
Full Report - Knight Program in Community Building
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
HURLEY | THE PUBLIC PROCESS 9Another early task is to agree on a facilitator for the group, whether it is aseparate hired facilitator, or simply group members rotat<strong>in</strong>g to play that role. Thefacilitator is part traffic cop, part gadfly. As traffic cop, the facilitator keeps the groupfocused on the agenda and enforces the ground rules, mak<strong>in</strong>g the group a safe placefor people to discuss ideas and problems. As gadfly, the facilitator asks for clarification,uncovers underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests, and tests statements and agreements to see if they hold.Hav<strong>in</strong>g a neutral third party whose job is to focus only on the process frees upother group members to advocate their own positions.Lesson: Have a charrette team member whose primary responsibility is to focuson the process. Be clear about the rules of engagement.As discussed earlier, many collaborative projects are consensus-based. However,the key po<strong>in</strong>t here is to be explicit about how decisions are made and who makesthem. People should know from the very beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g what role they play. Theparticipatory process should always be tied directly to a decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process.In charrettes, the role of participants is typically advisory. The designers use that<strong>in</strong>put to develop and improve the plan, but the City Council makes the decisionabout whether or not to adopt the plan. Although charrettes are transparent <strong>in</strong>the sense that the meet<strong>in</strong>gs and events dur<strong>in</strong>g the charrette are public and publicized,there is not always a clear explanation of how the charrette fits <strong>in</strong>to the larger policymak<strong>in</strong>gframework.Lesson: Be clear about the decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process and the role of the public.In some cases, one or more parties <strong>in</strong> a collaborative process may need tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gto participate effectively, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> either the process or <strong>in</strong> the substantive issues.This task is especially important if parties have very different levels of education orskills. The Open<strong>in</strong>g Presentation common <strong>in</strong> New Urbanist charrettes plays this role.Some of the activities common <strong>in</strong> the assessment/conven<strong>in</strong>g stage are conductedby the charrette sponsor and the designers as part of the RFP and contract<strong>in</strong>g process.For example, the client usually identifies some of the important stakeholders andtheir <strong>in</strong>terests. That task is cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> the public meet<strong>in</strong>gs held dur<strong>in</strong>g charrettes.However, I believe that more thorough attention to the tasks of this stage wouldleverage the power of a charrette to spark last<strong>in</strong>g change <strong>in</strong> a community.Strategically, I th<strong>in</strong>k that more attention to these tasks would lead to more frequentand more faithful implementation of charrette plans.