11.07.2015 Views

West Mojave Plan FEIR/S - Desert Managers Group

West Mojave Plan FEIR/S - Desert Managers Group

West Mojave Plan FEIR/S - Desert Managers Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“52 mi 2 of higher density tortoise areas,” “12 mi 2 of higher density vehicle-based impacts,” etc.).Dr. Krzysik has calculated that each sign count transect is sufficient to survey about 1.3% of agiven square mile. As such, data collected along transects are best used as an index, not anabsolute census of the population or its characteristics. Data from any one or two transectswould have very low predictive value for the square mile(s) being characterized.However, importantly, on a regional scale when all transects are combined, distributionpatterns and relative occurrences (i.e., “above” versus “below” average concentrations) oftortoises are revealed. And even more importantly, they are corroborated by distance samplingdata, and are consistent with trends reported on Dr. Berry’s study plots.Sign count survey data were used to: (a) refine proposed DWMA boundaries (e.g.,determine whether DWMA status was appropriate for the Iron Mountains, an area outside ofcritical habitat and north of Helendale/Silver Lakes where surveys identified significant amountsof tortoise sign); (b) determine the best places to close routes to minimize impacts in areas wheretortoises most likely occur; and (c) determine alternative DWMA boundaries and compare EIR/Salternatives.Sign count surveys conducted since 1988 (see Map 3-6) provide the most recent,available data on the distribution of tortoise sign, which Dr. Anthony Krzysik (2002a, b, c) hasshow to be positively correlated to incidence of tortoises. Over 8,100 transects have beensurveyed on more that 6,300 square miles within the <strong>West</strong> <strong>Mojave</strong> planning area. These surveyefforts are summarized in Appendix LMost of the best available data on current tortoise distribution and observable humandisturbances are encompassed in the 1998, 1999, and 2001-2002 data sets, when 3,372 transectswere surveyed for the <strong>West</strong> <strong>Mojave</strong> planning effort. Relevant information is described below:• 1998 <strong>West</strong> <strong>Mojave</strong> Regional Survey: This was the first regional sign count surveyundertaken on BLM lands in the western <strong>Mojave</strong> <strong>Desert</strong> in nearly 20 years. Surveyswere completed between July and September 1998 on 856 square miles.• 1999 <strong>West</strong> <strong>Mojave</strong>-Fort Irwin Regional Survey: Conducted under the direction of theBLM, USFWS, and Army, biologists surveyed various Fort Irwin expansion alternativeareas and remaining portions of the planning area, particularly in proposed DWMAs.Between July and September 1999 biologists surveyed 1,553 transects on 1,291 squaremiles around Fort Irwin and California City, among other places.• 2001-2002 <strong>West</strong> <strong>Mojave</strong> Regional Survey: Biologists surveyed BLM lands within theplanning area that were not surveyed in 1998 and 1999, might support significantaggregations of tortoises outside the proposed DWMAs (such as Searles, Indian Wells,and Rose valleys to the north), and could confirm areas of expected low-density (areaencompassed by I-15, I-40, Troy Dry Lake, and the eastern planning boundary).Between July 2001 and January 2002, a total of 1,329 square miles meeting one or moreof these criteria was surveyed.Chapter 3 3-81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!