Making the Record Committee - Final report - Wisconsin Court System
Making the Record Committee - Final report - Wisconsin Court System
Making the Record Committee - Final report - Wisconsin Court System
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
APPENDIX IIUSE OF ALTERNATIVE COURT REPORTING TECHNOLOGIES BY SIZE OF CIRCUITAltern?Who CompletedCounty # Judges District Survey Y/N TypeMarathon 5 9 Judge Y Electronic tape recordingSheboygan 5 4 Clerk's Office Y Lanier tape recorder+6- to 8-JudgeCounties Winnebago 6 4 Clerk of <strong>Court</strong> Y <strong>Record</strong>ingKenosha 7 2 Clerk of <strong>Court</strong> Y Lanier tape recording equipmentOutagamie 7 8 DCA NRock 7 5 DCA NBrown 8 8 DCA N10- to 12-JudgeCounties Racine 10 2 Clerk of <strong>Court</strong> Y Lanier tape recorderWaukesha 12 3 Business Mnger YDigital tape recorder and networked (PCbased) ECR17-Judge County Dane 17 5 DCA Y47-Judge County Milwaukee 47 1Mnging <strong>Court</strong>ReporterSummary Yes No# % # %1-Judge Counties 17 53% 15 47%2-Judge Counties 6 55% 5 45%3-Judge Counties 4 44% 5 56%4- and 5-Judge Co 3 38% 5 63%6-to 8-Judge Co 2 40% 3 60%10- to 12-Judge Co 2 100% 0 0%17-Judge County 1 100% 0 0%47-Judge County 1 100% 0 0%Total 36 52% 33 48%YLanier Advocate V (analog) & FTR Gold(digital)If yes, satisfied?If no, would you use?20 Yes; 8 No23 Yes; 7 No (some yeses were qualified)25
Change language