11.07.2015 Views

Making the Record Committee - Final report - Wisconsin Court System

Making the Record Committee - Final report - Wisconsin Court System

Making the Record Committee - Final report - Wisconsin Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX IPREVIOUS COURT REPORTING COMMITTEES AND REPORTSLegislative Audit Bureau Evaluation of Transcription Technology in <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Circuit<strong>Court</strong>s, August 1994. The Legislative Audit Bureau conducted an evaluation of <strong>the</strong> newtechnology available to assist in transcription of circuit court proceedings, as requestedby 1993 <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Act 16. Among its recommendations were <strong>the</strong> following:• Fourteen audio recording systems should be placed in Kenosha, Milwaukee andRacine counties’ specialized courtrooms, and a minimum level of audio recordingcapability should be provided in each of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r 69 counties if a commitment fromjudges in each county to use <strong>the</strong> audio system is obtained before an audio system ispurchased.• The State should provide <strong>the</strong> equipment and training needed for all court <strong>report</strong>ers tobecome proficient in computer-aided transcription. Along with this, court <strong>report</strong>ersshould be compensated for actual overtime hours worked, and transcript fees shouldbe retained by <strong>the</strong> state court system for o<strong>the</strong>r court purposes.• The Director of State <strong>Court</strong>s should engage a consultant to analyze actual jobresponsibilities in this new structure and develop an appropriate wage package forcourt <strong>report</strong>ers.The <strong>report</strong> acknowledged that implementation of <strong>the</strong>se recommendations would requireadditional state funding, so suggested that a four-year phase-out of <strong>the</strong> old system wouldbe more financially feasible and would make use of equipment already available.Subsequently, <strong>the</strong> Governor included in his 1995-1997 biennial budget bill: (a) fundingfor <strong>the</strong> State to begin to purchase and maintain computer-aided transcription equipmentfor <strong>report</strong>ers who did not have <strong>the</strong> equipment, with <strong>the</strong> provision that <strong>the</strong> State retain <strong>the</strong>transcript fees for those <strong>report</strong>ers who received <strong>the</strong> state-purchased equipment; (b)funding to purchase and maintain audio systems for each county; (c) elimination of <strong>the</strong>ability of circuit court judges to appoint a court <strong>report</strong>er, to be replaced by district<strong>report</strong>ers appointed, assigned and supervised by <strong>the</strong> chief judge in coordination with <strong>the</strong>district court administrator; (d) elimination of 8.0 district court <strong>report</strong>er positions inMilwaukee County and (e) reduction in funding for freelance court <strong>report</strong>ers.17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!