- Page 2: eferred to as "HTTP/1.1", and is an
- Page 5 and 6: 12.1 Server-driven Negotiation ....
- Page 7 and 8: 14.40 Trailer .....................
- Page 9: 1.2 RequirementsThe key words "MUST
- Page 13 and 14: messages flow from upstream to down
- Page 15 and 16: needs of those who build web applic
- Page 17 and 18: A semi-colon, set off some distance
- Page 19 and 20: value.comment = "(" *( ctext | quot
- Page 21 and 22: with a scheme name followed by a co
- Page 23 and 24: Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P
- Page 25 and 26: Unfortunately, some older HTTP/1.0
- Page 27 and 28: the Transfer-Encoding header field
- Page 29 and 30: An example process for decoding a C
- Page 31 and 32: any other media type: strictly as p
- Page 33 and 34: and any two-letter initial subtag i
- Page 35 and 36: there might exist some implementati
- Page 37 and 38: the message.2.If a Transfer-Encodin
- Page 39 and 40: | request-header ; Section 5.3| ent
- Page 41 and 42: the Request-URI, and the network lo
- Page 43 and 44: | Referer ; Section 14.36| TE ; Sec
- Page 45 and 46: RFC 2616 HTTP/1.1 June 1999| "407"
- Page 47 and 48: The extension-header mechanism allo
- Page 49 and 50: - Latency on subsequent requests is
- Page 51 and 52: It is especially important that pro
- Page 53 and 54: The purpose of the 100 (Continue) s
- Page 55 and 56: - Proxies SHOULD maintain a cache r
- Page 57 and 58: Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P
- Page 59 and 60: completed without transferring data
- Page 61 and 62:
error response SHOULD be given that
- Page 63 and 64:
proxy that can dynamically switch t
- Page 65 and 66:
SHOULD include an entity containing
- Page 67 and 68:
- Expires, Cache-Control, and/or Va
- Page 69 and 70:
Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P
- Page 71 and 72:
observing these limitations has sig
- Page 73 and 74:
public why the request has not been
- Page 75 and 76:
The requested resource is no longer
- Page 77 and 78:
y the next-hop server.10.5 Server E
- Page 79 and 80:
Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P
- Page 81 and 82:
automatic selection, though it also
- Page 83 and 84:
careful and complete analysis shows
- Page 85 and 86:
used.Multiple warnings MAY be attac
- Page 87 and 88:
esponse without validating it. Clie
- Page 89 and 90:
with every response, giving the tim
- Page 91 and 92:
Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P
- Page 93 and 94:
unconditionally, and includeCache-C
- Page 95 and 96:
decide if they represent the same o
- Page 97 and 98:
- The validator is being compared b
- Page 99 and 100:
cache-conditional requests. This al
- Page 101 and 102:
RFC 2616 HTTP/1.1 June 199913.5 Con
- Page 103 and 104:
according to the rules in section 4
- Page 105 and 106:
equest-header fields were used to s
- Page 107 and 108:
13.9 Side Effects of GET and HEADUn
- Page 109 and 110:
13.13 History ListsUser agents ofte
- Page 111 and 112:
SHOULD be interpreted as "I prefer
- Page 113 and 114:
Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P
- Page 115 and 116:
use of prefix tags if this is the c
- Page 117 and 118:
Allow = "Allow" ":" #MethodExample
- Page 119 and 120:
Cache-Control = "Cache-Control" ":"
- Page 121 and 122:
If the no-cache directive does not
- Page 123 and 124:
s-maxageIf a response includes an s
- Page 125 and 126:
evalidate its own entry, if any, wi
- Page 127 and 128:
14.9.5 No-Transform Directiveno-tra
- Page 129 and 130:
Message headers listed in the Conne
- Page 131 and 132:
Waitangi," presented simultaneously
- Page 133 and 134:
MIC is good for detecting accidenta
- Page 135 and 136:
Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P
- Page 137 and 138:
An example isDate: Tue, 15 Nov 1994
- Page 139 and 140:
with appropriate error status. The
- Page 141 and 142:
From: webmaster@w3.orgThis header f
- Page 143 and 144:
as PUT, from modifying a resource t
- Page 145 and 146:
Since date is derived from the clie
- Page 147 and 148:
Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P
- Page 149 and 150:
An example is:Location: http://www.
- Page 151 and 152:
the current connection and SHOULD N
- Page 153 and 154:
containing the satisfiable ranges o
- Page 155 and 156:
Unavailable) response to indicate h
- Page 157 and 158:
RFC 2616 HTTP/1.1 June 19993. If mu
- Page 159 and 160:
The Upgrade header field only appli
- Page 161 and 162:
Via = "Via" ":" 1#( received-protoc
- Page 163 and 164:
; the name or pseudonym of the serv
- Page 165 and 166:
whose version is HTTP/1.0 or lower,
- Page 167 and 168:
The information sent in the From fi
- Page 169 and 170:
Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P
- Page 171 and 172:
they would protect any system that
- Page 173 and 174:
suggestions and comments from indiv
- Page 175 and 176:
[19] Reynolds, J. and J. Postel, "A
- Page 177 and 178:
Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media T
- Page 179 and 180:
Paul J. LeachMicrosoft Corporation1
- Page 181 and 182:
Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P
- Page 183 and 184:
- HTTP/1.1 clients and caches SHOUL
- Page 185 and 186:
19.4.4 Introduction of Content-Enco
- Page 187 and 188:
disposition-type *( ";" disposition
- Page 189 and 190:
- A client that sends an HTTP/1.1 r
- Page 191 and 192:
Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P
- Page 193 and 194:
Fielding, et al. Standards Track [P