Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council
Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council
Richmond Valley Development Control Plan 2012concentrate on immediate neighbouring land-uses and main stakeholders.‣ Comment should give particularly attention to any increased demand forcommunity facilities/services within the locality or increase/ decrease inthe demand or provision of accommodation (housing).(c) High level SIAMinimum Requirements for Social Impact Assessment as per developmentstipulated within I8.3(2)(a)).‣ The SIA should detail whether any of the main considerations aboverelate to the proposal or the land location. A comprehensive response toeach of the questions within I8.3(1) will be required, and in instanceswhere an affirmative is recorded, the applicant shall provide a mitigatingsolution to be incorporated into the design and/or operating procedure ofthe development. Particular attention to detail should be provided inresponse to the following criteria:• Is the proposal likely to impact upon neighbourhood amenity andcommunity meeting places (including pedestrian commutingconduits, parklands, etc)?• Is the proposal likely to create any element of security or risk forany occupants, nearby residents or passing pedestrians?‣ The SIA is required to outline all potential impacts upon adjoining landusesand key stakeholders after completing a comprehensive scopingcomponent to identify all impacted stakeholders. The SIA must beprepared by a suitably qualified or specialist person and reference bestpractice principles and other contemporary studies.‣ The SIA shall incorporate a record of consultation with immediateneighbouring land-uses and key stakeholders. Comments and issuesraised should be documented preferably written and signed ‘letterhead’with responses from the applicant as to how the issues raised supportthe development, or suggest mitigating measures which may beincorporated to lessen the impact of the issue raised.‣ The applicant is required to provide a comprehensive analysis of allpotential impacts identified as a result of in-depth analysis of the locationand active/passive use of the proposal site and surrounds. All impactsshould be reported alongside all impacts resulting from community &stakeholder consultation. The proponent is also required to presentsuggested impact minimisation of all perceived impacts.‣ In addition to other SIA requirements listed here, consideration shouldalso be made regarding the following:• impact upon particular social groups, such as indigenous, children,aged, ethnic, youth, persons with a disability, etc• social equity (in particular any potential for any disadvantagedgroups to be displaced or further disadvantaged).• whether some form of ongoing monitoring should be proposed forthe early duration of the proposal, and if so, how a review ofimpacts can influence management practices. A conditionalPart I – Other Considerations – Social Impact Assessment I.86
Richmond Valley Development Control Plan 2012consent might require monitoring and review of potentially highsocial impact developments after a nominated period of time.• a Community Focus Meeting may be appropriate to scope potentialimpact issues and all affected stakeholders. In exceptionalcircumstances it could be advantageous to hold further focusmeetings as a monitoring and facilitating tool. The outcomes ofsuccessfully run Community Focus Meetings would provide Termsof Reference (TOR) for accurate predictive modelling within SIApresented alongside a development application.• some degree of quantitative (statistical) analysis may be useful todemonstrate the likelihood of impacts recognised within the TORwithin the SIA.I8.5 Advertising and Notification – SIAproceduresSection I15 concerning advertising and notification generally sets therequirement for advertising periods dependent upon development type. It isconsidered prudent that the applicant begin more detailed SIA consultationwell before the formal advertising period. Consultation should be initiated atleast one month before the advertising period in order to adequately informnearby residents and tenants as to the proposal and any possibleconsequence.Part I – Other Considerations – Social Impact Assessment I.87
- Page 35: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 38 and 39: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 40 and 41: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 42 and 43: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 44 and 45: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 46 and 47: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 48 and 49: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 50 and 51: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 52 and 53: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 54 and 55: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 56 and 57: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 58 and 59: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 61 and 62: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 63 and 64: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 65 and 66: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 67: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 70 and 71: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 72 and 73: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 74 and 75: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 76 and 77: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 78 and 79: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 81 and 82: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 83 and 84: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 85: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 90 and 91: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 92 and 93: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 94 and 95: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 96 and 97: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 98 and 99: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 100 and 101: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 102 and 103: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 104 and 105: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 106 and 107: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 108 and 109: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 110 and 111: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 113 and 114: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 115 and 116: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 117 and 118: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 119 and 120: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 121: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 124 and 125: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 126 and 127: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 128 and 129: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 131 and 132: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 133 and 134: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 135 and 136: Richmond Valley Development Control
<strong>Richmond</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Development Control Plan 2012concentrate on immediate neighbouring land-uses and main stakeholders.‣ Comment should give particularly attention to any increased demand forcommunity facilities/services within the locality or increase/ decrease inthe demand or provision of accommodation (housing).(c) High level SIAMinimum Requirements for Social Impact Assessment as per developmentstipulated within I8.3(2)(a)).‣ The SIA should detail whether any of the main considerations aboverelate to the proposal or the land location. A comprehensive response toeach of the questions within I8.3(1) will be required, and in instanceswhere an affirmative is recorded, the applicant shall provide a mitigatingsolution to be incorporated into the design and/or operating procedure ofthe development. <strong>Part</strong>icular attention to detail should be provided inresponse to the following criteria:• Is the proposal likely to impact upon neighbourhood amenity andcommunity meeting places (including pedestrian commutingconduits, parklands, etc)?• Is the proposal likely to create any element of security or risk forany occupants, nearby residents or passing pedestrians?‣ The SIA is required to outline all potential impacts upon adjoining landusesand key stakeholders after completing a comprehensive scopingcomponent to identify all impacted stakeholders. The SIA must beprepared by a suitably qualified or specialist person and reference bestpractice principles and other contemporary studies.‣ The SIA shall incorporate a record of consultation with immediateneighbouring land-uses and key stakeholders. Comments and issuesraised should be documented preferably written and signed ‘letterhead’with responses from the applicant as to how the issues raised supportthe development, or suggest mitigating measures which may beincorporated to lessen the impact of the issue raised.‣ The applicant is required to provide a comprehensive analysis of allpotential impacts identified as a result of in-depth analysis of the locationand active/passive use of the proposal site and surrounds. All impactsshould be reported alongside all impacts resulting from community &stakeholder consultation. The proponent is also required to presentsuggested impact minimisation of all perceived impacts.‣ In addition to other SIA requirements listed here, consideration shouldalso be made regarding the following:• impact upon particular social groups, such as indigenous, children,aged, ethnic, youth, persons with a disability, etc• social equity (in particular any potential for any disadvantagedgroups to be displaced or further disadvantaged).• whether some form of ongoing monitoring should be proposed forthe early duration of the proposal, and if so, how a review ofimpacts can influence management practices. A conditional<strong>Part</strong> I – <strong>Other</strong> <strong>Considerations</strong> – Social Impact Assessment I.86