Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council
Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council
Richmond Valley Development Control Plan 2012(d)(e)to manage appropriate and essential public services, infrastructure and amenities forRichmond Valley,to minimise the risk of harm to the community through the appropriate management ofdevelopment and land use.Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979requires that when determining a development application, a consent authority(Council) must take into consideration the likely social impacts of thatdevelopment in the locality. Richmond Valley Council (RVC) has a statutoryobligation to include consideration of social impacts of development proposalsin determining development proposals and may therefore require applicants toprovide social assessment within application detail, when necessary.Extract from Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979Section 79C Evaluation(1) Matters for consideration—generalIn determining a development application, a consent authority is to take into consideration suchof the following matters as are of relevance to the development the subject of the developmentapplication:(b) the likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts on both thenatural and built environments, and social and economic impacts in the locality,…and…(e) the public interest.Social Impact Assessment is the tool to accurately assess the social impactsof a proposal or application for development in the locality. Although thissection of the DCP is most relevant for development applications from privatefirms or individuals, it may also be a useful resource for authorities (includingCouncil) as to where and when a degree of SIA should be incorporated intoproposals initiated by authorities.I8.3 Design principles – SIA(1) Determining where Social Impact Assessment is requiredThe question as to whether the proposal will require a degree of Social ImpactAssessment can be answered by responding in the affirmative to any one ormore of the following:‣ Will the proposal disadvantage or benefit any particular social group, orthe locality or the community within Richmond Valley (RVC) as a whole?‣ Will the proposal be likely to give rise to an increase or reduction inemployment opportunities in the locality?‣ Will the proposal be likely to give rise to an increased demand forcommunity facilities or services within the locality, or RVC area as awhole?‣ Will the proposal be likely to affect the supply of, or demand for, housingwithin the locality or LGA?‣ Is the proposal likely to impact upon neighbourhood amenity and/orcommunity meeting places (including pedestrian commuting conduits,parklands, etc)?‣ Is the proposal likely to create any element of security or risk for anyoccupants, nearby residents or passing pedestrians?Part I – Other Considerations – Social Impact Assessment I.82
Richmond Valley Development Control Plan 2012(a) Social Impact Statements or Social Impact Assessment (SIA)?The majority of development proposals will only require suitable commentwithin or as part of the Statement of Environmental Effects (SEE)accompanying a formal application. A full SIA is required for morecomprehensive proposals which are likely to have larger potential impact uponsocial identity and cohesiveness.The main distinction in the levels of SIA invoked below is the depth and rangeof social implications of the proposal which need to be taken intoconsideration. Section 2.4 outlines the detail required for various levels ofSocial Impact Assessment which may be attributed to the development typeslisted below.There is a high likelihood that most larger scale developments and proposalswill require comprehensive SIA, particularly those which are ‘designated’ orrequiring multiple additional approvals or concurrence from State and/orCommonwealth agencies.(2) Determining what level of SIA is required for the proposal.(a) High degree SIADevelopment types which will require an extensive and comprehensivedegree of Social Impact Assessment accompanying the application:‣ Major Developments, such as:• Major new retail complexes, incorporating 4 or more shops,• Hospitals, Institutions, Rehabilitation Centres, and the like,• Childcare (caring for in excess of 15 children)‣ Tourist developments, Backpacker Accommodation and other transitoryguest accommodation catering for in excess of 10 guests,‣ Sex Service Premises and Restricted Premises,‣ Residential Development in excess of twelve (12) proposed dwellings ona single allotment, regardless of any strata potential,‣ Urban and Rural Industries employing over 20 people,‣ Service Stations, Depots, Entertainment Facilities, Function Centres,Registered Clubs and any other similar premise which may proposehours after 11.00 pm from the onset of operation, or potential at any timein the future,‣ Any other development Planning Staff interpret to likely presentcomparable social impacts to those listed above.(b) Moderate degree SIADevelopment types which will require an extensive degree of Social ImpactAssessment accompanying the application:‣ Developments, such as:• Small retail complexes, Neighbourhood Shops,• Medical Centres,• Childcare (caring for in 7 - 15 children),• Recreation facilities (indoor and outdoor, inc. water),• SchoolsPart I – Other Considerations – Social Impact Assessment I.83
- Page 32: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 35: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 38 and 39: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 40 and 41: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 42 and 43: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 44 and 45: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 46 and 47: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 48 and 49: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 50 and 51: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 52 and 53: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 54 and 55: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 56 and 57: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 58 and 59: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 61 and 62: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 63 and 64: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 65 and 66: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 67: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 70 and 71: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 72 and 73: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 74 and 75: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 76 and 77: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 78 and 79: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 81: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 85 and 86: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 87: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 90 and 91: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 92 and 93: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 94 and 95: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 96 and 97: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 98 and 99: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 100 and 101: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 102 and 103: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 104 and 105: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 106 and 107: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 108 and 109: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 110 and 111: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 113 and 114: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 115 and 116: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 117 and 118: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 119 and 120: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 121: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 124 and 125: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 126 and 127: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 128 and 129: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 131 and 132: Richmond Valley Development Control
<strong>Richmond</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Development Control Plan 2012(d)(e)to manage appropriate and essential public services, infrastructure and amenities for<strong>Richmond</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>,to minimise the risk of harm to the community through the appropriate management ofdevelopment and land use.Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979requires that when determining a development application, a consent authority(<strong>Council</strong>) must take into consideration the likely social impacts of thatdevelopment in the locality. <strong>Richmond</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (RVC) has a statutoryobligation to include consideration of social impacts of development proposalsin determining development proposals and may therefore require applicants toprovide social assessment within application detail, when necessary.Extract from Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979Section 79C Evaluation(1) Matters for consideration—generalIn determining a development application, a consent authority is to take into consideration suchof the following matters as are of relevance to the development the subject of the developmentapplication:(b) the likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts on both thenatural and built environments, and social and economic impacts in the locality,…and…(e) the public interest.Social Impact Assessment is the tool to accurately assess the social impactsof a proposal or application for development in the locality. Although thissection of the DCP is most relevant for development applications from privatefirms or individuals, it may also be a useful resource for authorities (including<strong>Council</strong>) as to where and when a degree of SIA should be incorporated intoproposals initiated by authorities.I8.3 Design principles – SIA(1) Determining where Social Impact Assessment is requiredThe question as to whether the proposal will require a degree of Social ImpactAssessment can be answered by responding in the affirmative to any one ormore of the following:‣ Will the proposal disadvantage or benefit any particular social group, orthe locality or the community within <strong>Richmond</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> (RVC) as a whole?‣ Will the proposal be likely to give rise to an increase or reduction inemployment opportunities in the locality?‣ Will the proposal be likely to give rise to an increased demand forcommunity facilities or services within the locality, or RVC area as awhole?‣ Will the proposal be likely to affect the supply of, or demand for, housingwithin the locality or LGA?‣ Is the proposal likely to impact upon neighbourhood amenity and/orcommunity meeting places (including pedestrian commuting conduits,parklands, etc)?‣ Is the proposal likely to create any element of security or risk for anyoccupants, nearby residents or passing pedestrians?<strong>Part</strong> I – <strong>Other</strong> <strong>Considerations</strong> – Social Impact Assessment I.82