Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council
Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council
Richmond Valley Development Control Plan 2012(2) Varying levels of Noise Impact Assessment as relevant to development(a) Low level Noise Impact AssessmentMinimum Requirements for where Noise Impact comment is required i.e.development stipulated within I7.3:‣ A statement summary as to whether there are any inconsistencies withthe existing land uses and the use proposed. Each land use should beaddressed individually (possibly in tabulated form) and a statementsummary supplied.‣ Comment should detail whether any of the main considerations aboverelate to the proposal or the location of the proposal. A short response toeach of the questions within I7.3(1) will suffice, in particular:• Is the proposal likely to impact upon adjoining land-uses(particularly if they are noise-sensitive), neighbourhood amenityand/or community land/meeting places (including pedestriancommuting conduits, parklands, etc)?‣ Comment should outline the likely impacts upon adjoining land-uses andkey stakeholders. Comment need not be prepared by a suitably qualifiedperson however must address all potential impacts and suggest possiblemitigating measures.‣ Comment does not need to entail predictive acoustic readings howevershould endeavour to quantitatively and qualitatively itemise all noisegenerating sources likely to be audible beyond the subject propertyboundary. In instances where the noise source is likely to generatesound which could be reasonably expected to be a nuisance, detail shallbe provided as to how impact may be mitigated.(b) Moderate level NIAMinimum Requirements for Social Impact Assessment as per developmentstipulated within I7.3 above:‣ A comprehensive summary as to whether there are any inconsistencieswith nearby existing land uses and the use proposed. Each adjoiningland-use should be addressed individually (possibly in tabulated form)and a paragraph summary supplied to outline all noise impacts andconsiderations. The NIA must provide a detailed response as to whetherany of the main considerations within I7.3(1) relate to the proposal or thelocation. If an affirmative response to any I7.3(1) consideration isrecorded, the applicant should demonstrate how negative impact may bemitigated and potentially incorporated into the design or operatingprocedure of the development.‣ The NIA shall outline all potential impacts upon adjoining land-uses andkey stakeholders. A report shall be comprehensive and prepared byperson or persons suitably qualified in acoustic reporting with referenceto best practice principles concerning contemporary acoustic reporting.Acoustic levels recorded (both background and peak shall be providedand incorporated into reasoning within the report.‣ The NIA should entail a component of community consultation, record indetail all resulting discussion and comments received, and outline howany potential negative impacts raised may be incorporated into thePart I – Other Considerations – Noise Impact Assessment I.76
Richmond Valley Development Control Plan 2012development design and operation. Community consultation shouldconcentrate on immediate neighbouring land-uses and main stakeholders.(c) High level SIAMinimum Requirements for Social Impact Assessment as per developmentstipulated within I7.3:‣ A comprehensive report shall be provided detailing any inconsistencieswith nearby existing land uses and the use proposed. Each adjoiningland-use should be addressed individually with a comprehensivesummary supplied to outline all noise impacts and considerations. TheNIA must provide a detailed response as to whether any of the mainconsiderations within I7.3(1) relate to the proposal or the location. If anaffirmative response to any I7.3(1) consideration is recorded, theapplicant must provide detail as to how negative impact will be mitigatedand measures incorporated into the design and/or operating procedureof the development to alleviate all noise impacts.‣ The NIA shall outline all potential impacts upon adjoining land-uses andkey stakeholders. A report shall be comprehensive and prepared by asuitably qualified acoustic engineer with particular reference to bestpractice principles and other contemporary studies (see section I7.5below).‣ The NIA is required to outline all potential impacts upon adjoining landusesand key stakeholders identified as a result of a comprehensivescoping component of the assessment. The acoustic engineer isrequired to address all impacted receivers and as well as suggestingongoing monitoring measures to improve upon existing land-useoperation and reporting procedures. Representative contact detailsshould be made readily available to any member of the effected public torecord and respond to offensive noise events. The operating proceduresof the development shall incorporate monitoring and responseprocedures which will ensure ongoing noise level compliance.‣ The NIA shall incorporate a record of consultation with immediateneighbouring land-uses and key stakeholders. Comments and issuesraised should be documented preferably written and signed ‘letterhead’with responses from the applicant as to how the issues raised supportthe development, or suggest mitigating measures which may beincorporated to lessen the impact of the issue raised.‣ The applicant is required to provide a comprehensive analysis of allpotential impacts identified as a result of in-depth analysis of the locationand active/passive use of the proposal site and surrounds. All impactsshould be reported alongside all impacts resulting from community &stakeholder consultation. The proponent is also required to presentsuggested impact minimisation of all perceived impacts.‣ The NIA should entail a component of community consultation, record indetail all resulting discussion and comments received, and outline howany potential negative impacts raised may be incorporated into thedevelopment design and operation. Community consultation shouldPart I – Other Considerations – Noise Impact Assessment I.77
- Page 26 and 27: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 28 and 29: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 30 and 31: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 32: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 35: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 38 and 39: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 40 and 41: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 42 and 43: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 44 and 45: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 46 and 47: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 48 and 49: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 50 and 51: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 52 and 53: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 54 and 55: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 56 and 57: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 58 and 59: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 61 and 62: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 63 and 64: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 65 and 66: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 67: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 70 and 71: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 72 and 73: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 74 and 75: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 78 and 79: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 81 and 82: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 83 and 84: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 85 and 86: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 87: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 90 and 91: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 92 and 93: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 94 and 95: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 96 and 97: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 98 and 99: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 100 and 101: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 102 and 103: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 104 and 105: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 106 and 107: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 108 and 109: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 110 and 111: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 113 and 114: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 115 and 116: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 117 and 118: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 119 and 120: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 121: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 124 and 125: Richmond Valley Development Control
<strong>Richmond</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Development Control Plan 2012development design and operation. Community consultation shouldconcentrate on immediate neighbouring land-uses and main stakeholders.(c) High level SIAMinimum Requirements for Social Impact Assessment as per developmentstipulated within I7.3:‣ A comprehensive report shall be provided detailing any inconsistencieswith nearby existing land uses and the use proposed. Each adjoiningland-use should be addressed individually with a comprehensivesummary supplied to outline all noise impacts and considerations. TheNIA must provide a detailed response as to whether any of the mainconsiderations within I7.3(1) relate to the proposal or the location. If anaffirmative response to any I7.3(1) consideration is recorded, theapplicant must provide detail as to how negative impact will be mitigatedand measures incorporated into the design and/or operating procedureof the development to alleviate all noise impacts.‣ The NIA shall outline all potential impacts upon adjoining land-uses andkey stakeholders. A report shall be comprehensive and prepared by asuitably qualified acoustic engineer with particular reference to bestpractice principles and other contemporary studies (see section I7.5below).‣ The NIA is required to outline all potential impacts upon adjoining landusesand key stakeholders identified as a result of a comprehensivescoping component of the assessment. The acoustic engineer isrequired to address all impacted receivers and as well as suggestingongoing monitoring measures to improve upon existing land-useoperation and reporting procedures. Representative contact detailsshould be made readily available to any member of the effected public torecord and respond to offensive noise events. The operating proceduresof the development shall incorporate monitoring and responseprocedures which will ensure ongoing noise level compliance.‣ The NIA shall incorporate a record of consultation with immediateneighbouring land-uses and key stakeholders. Comments and issuesraised should be documented preferably written and signed ‘letterhead’with responses from the applicant as to how the issues raised supportthe development, or suggest mitigating measures which may beincorporated to lessen the impact of the issue raised.‣ The applicant is required to provide a comprehensive analysis of allpotential impacts identified as a result of in-depth analysis of the locationand active/passive use of the proposal site and surrounds. All impactsshould be reported alongside all impacts resulting from community &stakeholder consultation. The proponent is also required to presentsuggested impact minimisation of all perceived impacts.‣ The NIA should entail a component of community consultation, record indetail all resulting discussion and comments received, and outline howany potential negative impacts raised may be incorporated into thedevelopment design and operation. Community consultation should<strong>Part</strong> I – <strong>Other</strong> <strong>Considerations</strong> – Noise Impact Assessment I.77