Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council
Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council Part I - Other Considerations - Richmond Valley Council
Richmond Valley Development Control Plan 2012(i) Dual Road FrontagesWhere residential development is proposed upon land having frontage to 2 ormore public roads (whether formed or unformed), a variation of up to 50%may be granted to the Front Building Line Setback on the secondary roadfrontage. Such a variation shall only be granted where:‣ the development is for residential development,‣ it can be demonstrated that the neighbourhood amenity will not beaffected by the variation,‣ the secondary frontage does not contain a vehicular access,‣ all existing and proposed structures on the property conform to theminimum building line setbacks contained within Table I3.1 for theprimary frontage (Note. a building line variation to more than onefrontage may be rejected),‣ the variation only applies to one secondary frontage, and‣ the frontage is not subject to identified road widening.Council will determine on merits whether a frontage is secondary and haveconsideration of things such as:‣ there being no vehicular access via that frontage,‣ orientation of development (existing or new) and whether it faces awayfrom that frontage, and‣ the length of the frontage relative to the property’s other frontages.(ii) Regard to immediately adjoining buildingsVariation to the front building line setback may be granted where developmenton an immediately adjoining property is forward of the identified setbackscontained within Table I3.1.Such a variation shall only be granted where:‣ the variation is to a primary frontage,‣ the existing front building lines on adjoining properties, being used tojustify this variation, are not facing towards secondary frontages,‣ the development is for residential purposes,‣ the adjoining properties have been developed for residentialdevelopment (not commercial or industrial).To establish the varied front building line setback a straight line shall be drawnfrom the closest, forward most building element on the adjoining properties,excluding any building elements considered to be an articulation zonevariation. This line shall be the new building line setback. See Figure I3.2.(iii) Articulation Zone VariationAn Articulation Zone is an area of development permitted to be constructedforward of the front building line defined in Table I3.1.The Articulation Zone aims to encourage architectural relief along the front ofresidential development by permitting part of the building to be erectedforward of the building line by up to 1.5 metres with a maximum area of 7 m 2 .Part I – Other Considerations – Setbacks and Building Height I.40
Richmond Valley Development Control Plan 2012Varied SetbackPrimary Road FrontageExistingResidentialBuildingSetback set by Table I3.1ExistingResidentialBuildingFigure I3.2 Defining a Front building line Setback Variation based uponadjoining development. (Line drawn between forward most elements onadjoining properties will become the new building line)Note. variation excludes consideration of that part of a structure erected withinan articulation zone.(b) Roads subject to Road WideningThe front building line setback to a road subject to road widening shall beincreased by 3 metres to that provided in this Chapter, to accommodate theproposed widening. Refer to Council Policy with regard to identified RoadWidening.(c) Commercial considerationsPedestrian areas should be accommodated into commercial developmentshaving a zero front building line setback.(d) Heritage Conservation Area considerationsFor development within the Casino CBD Heritage Conservation Area, a frontbuilding line setback of 10 metres shall apply to all development above theheight of the existing facade of the respective property.This setback is to provide for retention of existing facades whileaccommodating additional storeys that are outside the conservation area (10metres deep from the front boundaries along Barker and Walker Streets).By setting back such additions, and incorporating design considerations (referto Chapter I1.3(9)), there should be minimal impact on the streetscape of theconservation area.(e) Bush fire APZ considerationsLand within or adjoining a bushfire hazard may require larger setbacks thanthe minimums provided within this Chapter. Planning for Bushfire Protection(2006) should be consulted. The Asset Protection Zone should be containedwithin the boundaries of the land and therefore represents the minimumsetback, unless a larger setback is required by this Chapter or a developmentspecific chapter of this DCP.Alternative solutions involving reduced Asset Protection Zones may beconsidered on merit but will be subject to approval of the NSW Rural FireService.Part I – Other Considerations – Setbacks and Building Height I.41
- Page 3 and 4: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 5 and 6: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 7 and 8: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 9 and 10: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 11 and 12: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 13 and 14: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 15 and 16: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 17 and 18: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 19 and 20: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 21 and 22: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 23: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 26 and 27: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 28 and 29: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 30 and 31: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 32: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 35: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 38 and 39: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 42 and 43: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 44 and 45: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 46 and 47: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 48 and 49: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 50 and 51: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 52 and 53: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 54 and 55: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 56 and 57: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 58 and 59: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 61 and 62: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 63 and 64: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 65 and 66: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 67: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 70 and 71: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 72 and 73: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 74 and 75: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 76 and 77: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 78 and 79: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 81 and 82: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 83 and 84: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 85 and 86: Richmond Valley Development Control
- Page 87: Richmond Valley Development Control
<strong>Richmond</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Development Control Plan 2012(i) Dual Road FrontagesWhere residential development is proposed upon land having frontage to 2 ormore public roads (whether formed or unformed), a variation of up to 50%may be granted to the Front Building Line Setback on the secondary roadfrontage. Such a variation shall only be granted where:‣ the development is for residential development,‣ it can be demonstrated that the neighbourhood amenity will not beaffected by the variation,‣ the secondary frontage does not contain a vehicular access,‣ all existing and proposed structures on the property conform to theminimum building line setbacks contained within Table I3.1 for theprimary frontage (Note. a building line variation to more than onefrontage may be rejected),‣ the variation only applies to one secondary frontage, and‣ the frontage is not subject to identified road widening.<strong>Council</strong> will determine on merits whether a frontage is secondary and haveconsideration of things such as:‣ there being no vehicular access via that frontage,‣ orientation of development (existing or new) and whether it faces awayfrom that frontage, and‣ the length of the frontage relative to the property’s other frontages.(ii) Regard to immediately adjoining buildingsVariation to the front building line setback may be granted where developmenton an immediately adjoining property is forward of the identified setbackscontained within Table I3.1.Such a variation shall only be granted where:‣ the variation is to a primary frontage,‣ the existing front building lines on adjoining properties, being used tojustify this variation, are not facing towards secondary frontages,‣ the development is for residential purposes,‣ the adjoining properties have been developed for residentialdevelopment (not commercial or industrial).To establish the varied front building line setback a straight line shall be drawnfrom the closest, forward most building element on the adjoining properties,excluding any building elements considered to be an articulation zonevariation. This line shall be the new building line setback. See Figure I3.2.(iii) Articulation Zone VariationAn Articulation Zone is an area of development permitted to be constructedforward of the front building line defined in Table I3.1.The Articulation Zone aims to encourage architectural relief along the front ofresidential development by permitting part of the building to be erectedforward of the building line by up to 1.5 metres with a maximum area of 7 m 2 .<strong>Part</strong> I – <strong>Other</strong> <strong>Considerations</strong> – Setbacks and Building Height I.40