teljes anyag - Nyugat-Magyarországi Egyetem Mezőgazdaság

20Cs. Gombkötô – J. Iváncsics:Table 1. The harvested field of the garlic in the EU countries (1000 ha)1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004Bohemia 1.5 1.4 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.0Ésthonia 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0France 4.0 3.8 3.8 4.0 3.9Greece 1.8 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9Latvia 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Lithuania 0.2 0.1Hungary 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.3Malta 0.1Italy 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.2 3.1 3.0Spain 23.9 24.1 24.0 23.9 23.5 21.7Slovakia 1.1 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.1Slovenia 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1Source: Eurostat (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu)Table 2. The harvested quantity of the garlic in the EU countries (1000 t)1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004Austria 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Bohemia 7.7 7.1 5.4 2.2 1.0 0.6Ésthonia 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1Finnland 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0France 30.7 30.2 30.5 31.7 26.7Greece 13.2 17.2 13.8 15.7 15.1 15.1Latvia 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.9 1.2Lithuania 1.9 1.1Hungary 13.6 13.8 13.0 10.1 6.8Malta 1.0 1.1 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.8Italy 30.5 31.6 34.5 28.1 25.3 26.5Spain 178.1 187.0 175.1 194.7 188.9 157.1Slovakia 5.3 4.3 0.3 0.3 0.3Slovenia 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3Source: Eurostat (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu)Table 3. shows that the quantity of the produced garlic in Hungary has a considerable decreasingcompared to the previous years. It was caused by the cheap imported garlic fromthe Chinese markets. In European Commission occurred the matter of discussion that theimportation of the garlic should have to be made subject to licence from the third countries,this would be able to regulate the present quota system, could get the hungarian garlic productioninto a forefront again, which is popular in abroad, and has a excellent quality.Quasi 40–50% of the hungarian garlic production is exported, 25–30% of garlic getsto realization on inland (population use, industrial processing), the residual stays at theproducers for the next year to reproductive material (Mártonffy2000).