24.11.2012 Views

Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...

Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...

Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

� � = 0.62� � 0.5<br />

� � 0.33<br />

� � 0.29 gρL 2 dB<br />

�<br />

µL 2<br />

gρLd B 2<br />

kLa dB<br />

µ L<br />

� DL<br />

U G<br />

� (ρLDL)<br />

ρG �<br />

ρL<br />

� σ<br />

× � � 0.68<br />

� � 0.04<br />

�<br />

(gdB) 0.5<br />

(14-221)<br />

where k La = overall mass-transfer coefficient, d B = bubble diameter =<br />

0.003 m, D L = diffusivity of gas in liquid, ρ =density, µ =viscosity, σ =<br />

interfacial tension, g = gravitational acceleration.<br />

As mentioned earlier, surfactants and ionic solutions significantly<br />

affect mass transfer. Normally, surface affects act to retard coalescence<br />

and thus increase the mass transfer. For example, Hikata et al. [Chem.<br />

Eng. J., 22, 61–69 (1981)] have studied the effect of KCl on mass transfer<br />

in water. As KCI concentration increased, the mass transfer<br />

increased up to about 35 percent at an ionic strength of 6 gm/l. Other<br />

investigators have found similar increases for liquid mixtures.<br />

Axial Dispersion Backmixing in bubble columns has been<br />

extensively studied. Wiemann and Mewes [Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44,<br />

4959 (2005)] and Wild et al. [Int. J. Chemical Reactor Eng., 1, R7<br />

(2003)] give a long list of references pertaining to backmixing in<br />

bubble columns. An excellent review article by Shah et al. [AIChE J.,<br />

24, 369 (1978)] has summarized the literature prior to 1978. Works by<br />

Konig et al. [Ger. Chem. Eng., 1, 199 (1978)], Lucke et al. [Trans. Inst.<br />

Chem. Eng., 58, 228 (1980)], Riquarts [Ger. Chem. Eng., 4, 18<br />

(1981)], Mersmann (op. cit.), Deckwer (op. cit.), Yang et al. [Chem.<br />

Eng. Sci., 47(9–11), 2859 (1992)], and Garcia-Calvo and Leton<br />

[Chem. Eng. Sci., 49(21), 3643 (1994)] are particularly useful references.<br />

Axial dispersion occurs in both the liquid and the gas phases. The<br />

degree of axial dispersion is affected by vessel diameter, vessel internals,<br />

gas superficial velocity, and surface-active agents that retard coalescence.<br />

For systems with coalescence-retarding surfactants the<br />

initial bubble size produced by the gas sparger is also significant.<br />

The gas and liquid physical properties have only a slight effect on the<br />

degree of axial dispersion, except that liquid viscosity becomes important<br />

as the flow regime becomes laminar. With pure liquids, in the<br />

absence of coalescence-inhibiting, surface-active agents, the nature of<br />

the sparger has little effect on the axial dispersion, and experimental<br />

results are reasonably well correlated by the dispersion model. For the<br />

liquid phase the correlation recommended by Deckwer et al. (op.<br />

cit.), after the original work by Baird and Rice [Chem. Eng. J., 9,<br />

171(1975)] is as follows:<br />

= 0.35� � 1/3 gD<br />

�<br />

UG 2<br />

EL<br />

�<br />

(DUG)<br />

(14-222)<br />

Gases and liquids may be intentionally contacted as in absorption and<br />

distillation, or a mixture of phases may occur unintentionally as in<br />

vapor condensation from inadvertent cooling or liquid entrainment<br />

from a film. Regardless of the origin, it is usually desirable or necessary<br />

ultimately to separate gas-liquid dispersions. While separation<br />

will usually occur naturally, the rate is often economically intolerable<br />

and separation processes are employed to accelerate the step.<br />

GAS-PHASE CONTINUOUS SYSTEMS<br />

Practical separation techniques for liquid particles in gases are discussed.<br />

Since gas-borne particulates include both liquid and solid particles,<br />

many devices used for dry-dust collection (discussed in Sec. 17<br />

under “Gas-Solids Separation”) can be adapted to liquid-particle separation.<br />

Also, the basic subject of particle mechanics is covered in Sec.<br />

6. Separation of liquid particulates is frequently desirable in chemical<br />

processes such as in countercurrent-stage contacting because liquid<br />

entrainment with the gas partially reduces true countercurrency. Sep-<br />

PHASE SEPARATION<br />

PHASE SEPARATION 14-111<br />

where EL = liquid-phase axial dispersion coefficient, UG = superficial<br />

velocity of the gas phase, D = vessel diameter, and g = gravitational<br />

acceleration.<br />

The recommended correlation for the gas-phase axial-dispersion<br />

coefficient is given by Field and Davidson (loc. cit.):<br />

EG = 56.4 D1.33� � 3.56<br />

UG<br />

(14-223)<br />

where EG = gas-phase axial-dispersion coefficient, m2 �<br />

ε<br />

/s; D = vessel<br />

diameter, m; UG = superficial gas velocity, m/s; and ε =fractional gas<br />

holdup, volume fraction.<br />

The correlations given in the preceding paragraphs are applicable<br />

to vertical cylindrical vessels with pure liquids without coalescence<br />

inhibitors. For other vessel geometries such as columns of rectangular<br />

cross section, packed columns, and coiled tubes, the work of Shah<br />

et al. (loc. cit.) should be consulted. For systems containing coalescence-inhibiting<br />

surfactants, axial dispersion can be vastly different<br />

from that in systems in which coalescence is negligible. Konig et al.<br />

(loc. cit.) have well demonstrated the effects of surfactants and<br />

sparger type by conducting tests with weak alcohol solutions using<br />

three different porous spargers. With pure water, the sparger—and,<br />

consequently, initial bubble size—had little effect on back mixing<br />

because coalescence produced a dynamic-equilibrium bubble size not<br />

far above the sparger. With surfactants, the average bubble size was<br />

smaller than the dynamic-equilibrium bubble size. Small bubbles produced<br />

minimal back mixing up to ε ≈ 0.40; however, above ε ≈ 0.40<br />

backmixing increased very rapidly as UG increased The rapid increase<br />

in back mixing as ε exceeds 0.40 was postulated to occur indirectly<br />

because a bubble carries upward with it a volume of liquid equal to<br />

about 70 percent of the bubble volume, and, for ε≈0.40, the bubbles<br />

carry so much liquid upward that steady, uniform bubble rise can no<br />

longer be maintained and an oscillating, slugging flow develops, which<br />

produces fluctuating pressure at the gas distributor and the formation<br />

of large eddies. The large eddies greatly increase backmixing. For the<br />

air alcohol-water system, the minimum bubble size to prevent<br />

unsteady conditions was about 1, 1.5, and 2 mm for UG = 1, 3, and 5<br />

cm/s, respectively. Any smaller bubble size produced increased backmixing.<br />

The results of Konig et al. (loc. cit.) clearly indicate that the<br />

interaction of surfactants and sparger can be very complex; thus, one<br />

should proceed very cautiously in designing systems for which surfactants<br />

significantly retard coalescence. Caution is particularly important<br />

because surfactants can produce either much more or much less<br />

backmixing than surfactant-free systems, depending on the bubble<br />

size, which, in turn, depends on the sparger utilized.<br />

aration before entering another process step may be needed to prevent<br />

corrosion, to prevent yield loss, or to prevent equipment damage<br />

or malfunction. Separation before the atmospheric release of gases<br />

may be necessary to prevent environmental problems and for regulatory<br />

compliance.<br />

GENERAL REFERENCES<br />

G-1. Buonicore and Davis, eds., Air Pollution Engineering Manual, Van Nostrand<br />

Reinhold, New York, 1992.<br />

G-2. Calvert and Englund, eds., Handbook of Air Pollution Technology, Wiley,<br />

New York, 1984.<br />

G-3. Cheremisinoff, ed., Encyclopedia of Environmental Control Technology,<br />

vol. 2, Gulf Pub., Houston, 1989.<br />

G-4. McKetta, Unit Operations Handbook, vol. 1–2, Dekker, New York, 1992.<br />

G-5. Wark and Warner, Air Pollution: Its Origin and Control, 2d ed., Harper &<br />

Row, New York, 1981.<br />

G-6. Hesketh, Air Pollution Control, 1979; Fine Particles in Gaseous Media,<br />

Ann Arbor Science Pubs., Ann Arbor, MI, 1977.<br />

G-7. Stern, Air Pollution, 3d ed., vols. 3–5, Academic, Orlando, FL, 1976–77.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!