Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...
Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...
Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
� � = 0.62� � 0.5<br />
� � 0.33<br />
� � 0.29 gρL 2 dB<br />
�<br />
µL 2<br />
gρLd B 2<br />
kLa dB<br />
µ L<br />
� DL<br />
U G<br />
� (ρLDL)<br />
ρG �<br />
ρL<br />
� σ<br />
× � � 0.68<br />
� � 0.04<br />
�<br />
(gdB) 0.5<br />
(14-221)<br />
where k La = overall mass-transfer coefficient, d B = bubble diameter =<br />
0.003 m, D L = diffusivity of gas in liquid, ρ =density, µ =viscosity, σ =<br />
interfacial tension, g = gravitational acceleration.<br />
As mentioned earlier, surfactants and ionic solutions significantly<br />
affect mass transfer. Normally, surface affects act to retard coalescence<br />
and thus increase the mass transfer. For example, Hikata et al. [Chem.<br />
Eng. J., 22, 61–69 (1981)] have studied the effect of KCl on mass transfer<br />
in water. As KCI concentration increased, the mass transfer<br />
increased up to about 35 percent at an ionic strength of 6 gm/l. Other<br />
investigators have found similar increases for liquid mixtures.<br />
Axial Dispersion Backmixing in bubble columns has been<br />
extensively studied. Wiemann and Mewes [Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44,<br />
4959 (2005)] and Wild et al. [Int. J. Chemical Reactor Eng., 1, R7<br />
(2003)] give a long list of references pertaining to backmixing in<br />
bubble columns. An excellent review article by Shah et al. [AIChE J.,<br />
24, 369 (1978)] has summarized the literature prior to 1978. Works by<br />
Konig et al. [Ger. Chem. Eng., 1, 199 (1978)], Lucke et al. [Trans. Inst.<br />
Chem. Eng., 58, 228 (1980)], Riquarts [Ger. Chem. Eng., 4, 18<br />
(1981)], Mersmann (op. cit.), Deckwer (op. cit.), Yang et al. [Chem.<br />
Eng. Sci., 47(9–11), 2859 (1992)], and Garcia-Calvo and Leton<br />
[Chem. Eng. Sci., 49(21), 3643 (1994)] are particularly useful references.<br />
Axial dispersion occurs in both the liquid and the gas phases. The<br />
degree of axial dispersion is affected by vessel diameter, vessel internals,<br />
gas superficial velocity, and surface-active agents that retard coalescence.<br />
For systems with coalescence-retarding surfactants the<br />
initial bubble size produced by the gas sparger is also significant.<br />
The gas and liquid physical properties have only a slight effect on the<br />
degree of axial dispersion, except that liquid viscosity becomes important<br />
as the flow regime becomes laminar. With pure liquids, in the<br />
absence of coalescence-inhibiting, surface-active agents, the nature of<br />
the sparger has little effect on the axial dispersion, and experimental<br />
results are reasonably well correlated by the dispersion model. For the<br />
liquid phase the correlation recommended by Deckwer et al. (op.<br />
cit.), after the original work by Baird and Rice [Chem. Eng. J., 9,<br />
171(1975)] is as follows:<br />
= 0.35� � 1/3 gD<br />
�<br />
UG 2<br />
EL<br />
�<br />
(DUG)<br />
(14-222)<br />
Gases and liquids may be intentionally contacted as in absorption and<br />
distillation, or a mixture of phases may occur unintentionally as in<br />
vapor condensation from inadvertent cooling or liquid entrainment<br />
from a film. Regardless of the origin, it is usually desirable or necessary<br />
ultimately to separate gas-liquid dispersions. While separation<br />
will usually occur naturally, the rate is often economically intolerable<br />
and separation processes are employed to accelerate the step.<br />
GAS-PHASE CONTINUOUS SYSTEMS<br />
Practical separation techniques for liquid particles in gases are discussed.<br />
Since gas-borne particulates include both liquid and solid particles,<br />
many devices used for dry-dust collection (discussed in Sec. 17<br />
under “Gas-Solids Separation”) can be adapted to liquid-particle separation.<br />
Also, the basic subject of particle mechanics is covered in Sec.<br />
6. Separation of liquid particulates is frequently desirable in chemical<br />
processes such as in countercurrent-stage contacting because liquid<br />
entrainment with the gas partially reduces true countercurrency. Sep-<br />
PHASE SEPARATION<br />
PHASE SEPARATION 14-111<br />
where EL = liquid-phase axial dispersion coefficient, UG = superficial<br />
velocity of the gas phase, D = vessel diameter, and g = gravitational<br />
acceleration.<br />
The recommended correlation for the gas-phase axial-dispersion<br />
coefficient is given by Field and Davidson (loc. cit.):<br />
EG = 56.4 D1.33� � 3.56<br />
UG<br />
(14-223)<br />
where EG = gas-phase axial-dispersion coefficient, m2 �<br />
ε<br />
/s; D = vessel<br />
diameter, m; UG = superficial gas velocity, m/s; and ε =fractional gas<br />
holdup, volume fraction.<br />
The correlations given in the preceding paragraphs are applicable<br />
to vertical cylindrical vessels with pure liquids without coalescence<br />
inhibitors. For other vessel geometries such as columns of rectangular<br />
cross section, packed columns, and coiled tubes, the work of Shah<br />
et al. (loc. cit.) should be consulted. For systems containing coalescence-inhibiting<br />
surfactants, axial dispersion can be vastly different<br />
from that in systems in which coalescence is negligible. Konig et al.<br />
(loc. cit.) have well demonstrated the effects of surfactants and<br />
sparger type by conducting tests with weak alcohol solutions using<br />
three different porous spargers. With pure water, the sparger—and,<br />
consequently, initial bubble size—had little effect on back mixing<br />
because coalescence produced a dynamic-equilibrium bubble size not<br />
far above the sparger. With surfactants, the average bubble size was<br />
smaller than the dynamic-equilibrium bubble size. Small bubbles produced<br />
minimal back mixing up to ε ≈ 0.40; however, above ε ≈ 0.40<br />
backmixing increased very rapidly as UG increased The rapid increase<br />
in back mixing as ε exceeds 0.40 was postulated to occur indirectly<br />
because a bubble carries upward with it a volume of liquid equal to<br />
about 70 percent of the bubble volume, and, for ε≈0.40, the bubbles<br />
carry so much liquid upward that steady, uniform bubble rise can no<br />
longer be maintained and an oscillating, slugging flow develops, which<br />
produces fluctuating pressure at the gas distributor and the formation<br />
of large eddies. The large eddies greatly increase backmixing. For the<br />
air alcohol-water system, the minimum bubble size to prevent<br />
unsteady conditions was about 1, 1.5, and 2 mm for UG = 1, 3, and 5<br />
cm/s, respectively. Any smaller bubble size produced increased backmixing.<br />
The results of Konig et al. (loc. cit.) clearly indicate that the<br />
interaction of surfactants and sparger can be very complex; thus, one<br />
should proceed very cautiously in designing systems for which surfactants<br />
significantly retard coalescence. Caution is particularly important<br />
because surfactants can produce either much more or much less<br />
backmixing than surfactant-free systems, depending on the bubble<br />
size, which, in turn, depends on the sparger utilized.<br />
aration before entering another process step may be needed to prevent<br />
corrosion, to prevent yield loss, or to prevent equipment damage<br />
or malfunction. Separation before the atmospheric release of gases<br />
may be necessary to prevent environmental problems and for regulatory<br />
compliance.<br />
GENERAL REFERENCES<br />
G-1. Buonicore and Davis, eds., Air Pollution Engineering Manual, Van Nostrand<br />
Reinhold, New York, 1992.<br />
G-2. Calvert and Englund, eds., Handbook of Air Pollution Technology, Wiley,<br />
New York, 1984.<br />
G-3. Cheremisinoff, ed., Encyclopedia of Environmental Control Technology,<br />
vol. 2, Gulf Pub., Houston, 1989.<br />
G-4. McKetta, Unit Operations Handbook, vol. 1–2, Dekker, New York, 1992.<br />
G-5. Wark and Warner, Air Pollution: Its Origin and Control, 2d ed., Harper &<br />
Row, New York, 1981.<br />
G-6. Hesketh, Air Pollution Control, 1979; Fine Particles in Gaseous Media,<br />
Ann Arbor Science Pubs., Ann Arbor, MI, 1977.<br />
G-7. Stern, Air Pollution, 3d ed., vols. 3–5, Academic, Orlando, FL, 1976–77.