Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...
Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...
Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
14-98 EQUIPMENT FOR DISTILLATION, GAS ABSORPTION, PHASE DISPERSION, AND PHASE SEPARATION<br />
TABLE 14-21 Simulation of Three Heat Exchangers<br />
with Varying Foreign Nuclei<br />
1 2 3<br />
Weight fraction, noncondensable<br />
Inlet 0.51 0.42 0.02<br />
Outlet<br />
Molecular weight<br />
0.80 0.80 0.32<br />
Inert 28 29 29<br />
Condensable<br />
Temperature difference between gas and<br />
liquid interface, K<br />
86 99 210<br />
Inlet 14 24 67<br />
Outlet<br />
Percent of liquid that leaves unit as fog<br />
Nuclei concentration in inlet particles/cm<br />
4 10 4<br />
3<br />
100 0.05 1.1 2.2<br />
1,000 0.44 5.6 3.9<br />
10,000 3.2 9.8 4.9<br />
100,000 9.6 11.4 5.1<br />
1,000,000 13.3 11.6<br />
10,000,000 14.7<br />
∞ 14.7 11.8 5.1<br />
Fog particle size based on 10,000 nuclei/cm3 at inlet, µm<br />
28 25 4<br />
yields the same relative increase in temperature driving force. However,<br />
the interface vapor pressure can only approach the limit of zero.<br />
Because of this, for equal molecular and thermal diffusivities a saturated<br />
mixture will supersaturate when cooled. The tendency to supersaturate<br />
generally increases with increased molecular weight of the<br />
condensable, increased temperature differences, and reduced initial<br />
superheating. To evaluate whether a given condensing step yields fog<br />
requires rigorous treatment of the coupled heat-transfer and masstransfer<br />
processes through the entire condensation. Steinmeyer<br />
[Chem. Eng. Prog., 68(7), 64 (1972)] illustrates this, showing the<br />
impact of foreign-nuclei concentration on calculated fog formation.<br />
See Table 14-21. Note the relatively large particles generated for cases<br />
1 and 2 for 10,000 foreign nuclei per cm 3 . These are large enough to<br />
be fairly easily collected. There have been very few documented problems<br />
with industrial condensers despite the fact that most calculate to<br />
generate supersaturation along the condensing path. The explanation<br />
appears to be a limited supply of foreign nuclei.<br />
Ryan et al. [Chem. Eng. Progr., 90(8), 83 (1994)] show that separate<br />
mass and heat transfer-rate modeling of an HCl absorber predicts 2<br />
percent fog in the vapor. The impact is equivalent to lowering the<br />
stage efficiency to 20 percent.<br />
Spontaneous (Homogeneous) Nucleation This process is<br />
quite difficult because of the energy barrier associated with creation<br />
of the interfacial area. It can be treated as a kinetic process with the<br />
rate a very steep function of the supersaturation ratio (S = partial pressure<br />
of condensable per vapor pressure at gas temperature). For<br />
water, an increase in S from 3.4 to 3.9 causes a 10,000-fold increase in<br />
the nucleation rate. As a result, below a critical supersaturation (Scrit),<br />
homogeneous nucleation is slow enough to be ignored. Generally, Scrit<br />
is defined as that which limits nucleation to one particle produced per<br />
cubic centimeter per second. It can be estimated roughly by traditional<br />
theory (Theory of Fog Condensation, Israel Program for Scientific<br />
Translations, Jerusalem, 1967) using the following equation:<br />
Scrit = exp�0.56 �� 3/2<br />
� �<br />
ρl T<br />
where σ=surface tension, mN/m (dyn/cm)<br />
ρ l = liquid density, g/cm 3<br />
T = temperature, K<br />
M = molecular weight of condensable<br />
�<br />
(14-205)<br />
Table 14-22 shows typical experimental values of S crit taken from the<br />
work of Russel [J. Chem. Phys., 50, 1809 (1969)]. Since the critical<br />
supersaturation ratio for homogeneous nucleation is typically greater<br />
M<br />
σ<br />
TABLE 14-22 Experimental Critical Supersaturation Ratios<br />
Temperature, K Scrit H2O 264 4.91<br />
C2H5OH 275 2.13<br />
CH4OH 264 3.55<br />
C6H6 253 5.32<br />
CCl4 247 6.5<br />
CHCl3 258 3.73<br />
C6H5Cl 250 9.5<br />
than 3, it is not often reached in process equipment. However, fog formation<br />
is typically found in steam turbines. Gyarmathy [Proc. Inst.<br />
Mech. E., Part A: J. Power and Energy 219(A6), 511–521 (2005)]<br />
reports fog in the range 3.5 to 5 percent of total steam flow, with average<br />
fog diameter in the range of 0.1 to 0.2 µm.<br />
Growth on Foreign Nuclei As noted above, foreign nuclei are<br />
often present in abundance and permit fog formation at much lower<br />
supersaturation. For example,<br />
1. Solids. Surveys have shown that air contains thousands of particles<br />
per cubic centimeter in the 0.1-µm to 1-µm range suitable for<br />
nuclei. The sources range from ocean-generated salt spray to combustion<br />
processes. The concentration is highest in large cities and industrial<br />
regions. When the foreign nuclei are soluble in the fog,<br />
nucleation occurs at S values very close to 1.0. This is the mechanism<br />
controlling atmospheric water condensation. Even when not soluble,<br />
a foreign particle is an effective nucleus if wet by the liquid. Thus, a<br />
1-µm insoluble particle with zero contact angle requires an S of only<br />
1.001 in order to serve as a condensation site for water.<br />
2. Ions. Amelin [Theory of Fog Condensation, Israel Program for<br />
Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, (1967)] reports that ordinary air<br />
contains even higher concentrations of ions. These ions also reduce<br />
the required critical supersaturation, but by only about 10 to 20 percent,<br />
unless multiple charges are present.<br />
3. Entrained liquids. Production of small droplets is inherent in<br />
the bubbling process, as shown by Fig. 14-90. Values range from near<br />
zero to 10,000/cm 3 of vapor, depending on how the vapor breaks<br />
through the liquid and on the opportunity for evaporation of the small<br />
drops after entrainment.<br />
As a result of these mechanisms, most process streams contain<br />
enough foreign nuclei to cause some fogging. While fogging has been<br />
reported in only a relatively low percent of process partial condensers,<br />
it is rarely looked for and volunteers its presence only when yield<br />
losses or pollution is intolerable.<br />
Dropsize Distribution Monodisperse (nearly uniform droplet<br />
size) fogs can be grown by providing a long retention time for growth.<br />
However, industrial fogs usually show a broad distribution, as in Fig.<br />
14-91. Note also that for this set of data, the sizes are several orders of<br />
magnitude smaller than those shown earlier for entrainment and<br />
atomizers.<br />
The result, as discussed in a later subsection, is a demand for different<br />
removal devices for the small particles.<br />
While generally fog formation is a nuisance, it can occasionally be<br />
useful because of the high surface area generated by the fine drops.<br />
An example is insecticide application.<br />
GAS-IN-LIQUID DISPERSIONS<br />
GENERAL REFERENCES: Design methods for agitated vessels are presented by<br />
Penney in Couper et al., Chemical Process Equipment, Selection and Design,<br />
Chap. 10, Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington, Mass., 2005. A comprehensive<br />
review of all industrial mixing technology is given by Paul, Atemo-Obeng,<br />
and Kresta, Handbook of Industrial Mixing, Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., 2004. Comprehensive<br />
treatments of bubbles or foams are given by Akers, Foams: Symposium<br />
1975, Academic Press, New York, 1973; Bendure, Tappi, 58, 83 (1975);<br />
Benfratello, Energ Elettr., 30, 80, 486 (1953); Berkman and Egloff, Emulsions<br />
and Foams, Reinhold, New York, 1941, pp. 112–152; Bikerman, Foams,<br />
Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975; Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology,<br />
4th ed., Wiley, New York, 1993, pp. 82–145; Haberman and Morton,<br />
Report 802, David W. Taylor Model Basin, Washington, 1953; Levich, Physicochemical<br />
Hydrodynamics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962; and Soo,<br />
Fluid Dynamics of Multiphase Systems, Blaisdell, Waltham, Massachusetts,