Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...
Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...
Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(f)<br />
(a)<br />
This is remarkably similar to the empirical two-fluid atomizer relationships<br />
of El-Shanawany and Lefebvre [J. Energy, 4, 184 (1980)]<br />
and Jasuja [Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Engr., 103, 514 (1981)]. For example,<br />
El-Shanawany and Lefebvre give a relationship for a prefilming<br />
atomizer:<br />
D32 = 0.0711(σ/ρG) 0.6 (1/velocity) 1.2 (1 + L/G)(Dnozzle) 0.4 (ρL/ρG) 0.1<br />
+ 0.015[(µL) 2 /(σ×ρL)] 0.5 (Dnozzle) 0.5 (1 + L/G) (14-199)<br />
where µL is liquid viscosity.<br />
According to Jasuja,<br />
D32 = 0.17(σ/ρG) 0.45 (1/velocity) 0.9 (1 + L/G) 0.5 (Dnozzle) 0.55<br />
+ viscosity term (14-200)<br />
[Eqs. (14-198), (14-199), and (14-200) are dimensionally consistent;<br />
any set of consistent units on the right-hand side yields the droplet<br />
size in units of length on the left-hand side.]<br />
The second, additive term carrying the viscosity impact in Eq. (14-<br />
199) is small at viscosities around 1 cP but can become controlling as<br />
viscosity increases. For example, for air at atmospheric pressure atomizing<br />
water, with nozzle conditions<br />
Dnozzle = 0.076 m (3 in)<br />
velocity = 100 m/s (328 ft/s)<br />
L/G = 1<br />
El-Shanaway measured 70 µm and his Eq. (14-199) predicted 76 µm.<br />
The power/mass correlation [Eq. (14-198)] predicts 102 µm. The<br />
agreement between both correlations and the measurement is much<br />
better than normally achieved.<br />
(b)<br />
(h)<br />
(c) (d)<br />
(e)<br />
(g) (i)<br />
PHASE DISPERSION 14-95<br />
FIG. 14-87 Charactersitic spray nozzles. (a) Whirl-chamber hollow cone. (b) Solid cone. (c) Oval-orifice fan. (d) Deflector jet. (e) Impinging jet.<br />
( f) Bypass. (g) Poppet. (h) Two-fluid. (i) Vaned rotating wheel.<br />
Rotary Atomizers For rotating wheels, vaneless disks, and cups,<br />
there are three regimes of operation. At low rates, the liquid is shed<br />
directly as drops from the rim. At intermediate rates, the liquid leaves<br />
the rim as threads; and at the highest rate, the liquid extends from the<br />
edge as a thin sheet that breaks down similarly to a fan or hollow-cone<br />
spray nozzle. As noted in Table 14-19, rotary devices have many<br />
unique advantages such as the ability to handle high viscosity and slurries<br />
and produce small droplets without high pressures. The prime<br />
applications are in spray drying. See Masters [Spray Drying Handbook,<br />
Wiley, New York (1991)] for more details.<br />
Pipeline Contactors The correlation for droplet diameter based<br />
on power/mass is similar to that for two-fluid nozzles. The dimensionless<br />
correlation is<br />
D32 = 0.8(σ/ρG) 0.6 (1/velocity) 1.2 (Dpipe) 0.4 (14-201)<br />
(The relation is dimensionally consistent; any set of consistent units on<br />
the right-hand side yields the droplet size in units of length on the lefthand<br />
side.)<br />
The relationship is similar to the empirical correlation of Tatterson,<br />
Dallman, and Hanratty [Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J., 23(1), 68 (1977)]<br />
σ<br />
� ρG<br />
D 32 ∼ � � 0.5<br />
(1/velocity) 1 (Dpipe) 0.5<br />
Predictions from Eq. (14-201) align well with the Tatterson data. For<br />
example, for a velocity of 43 m/s (140 ft/s) in a 0.05-m (1.8-inch)<br />
equivalent diameter channel, Eq. (14-201) predicts D32 of 490<br />
microns, compared to the measured 460 to 480 microns.