24.11.2012 Views

Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...

Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...

Packed Bed flooding.pdf - Youngstown State University's Personal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14-88 EQUIPMENT FOR DISTILLATION, GAS ABSORPTION, PHASE DISPERSION, AND PHASE SEPARATION<br />

FIG. 14-84 Cost of towers including installation and auxiliaries. To convert<br />

inches to millimeters, multiply by 25.4; to convert feet to meters, multiply by<br />

0.305; and to convert dollars per foot to dollars per meter, multiply by 3.28.<br />

(Peters and Timmerhaus, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers,<br />

4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.)<br />

However, droplet systems can enable much higher energy input<br />

(via gas phase pressure drop in cocurrent systems) and, as a result,<br />

dominate applications where a quick quench is needed. See Examples<br />

21 and 22. Conversely, droplet systems can also be designed for very<br />

low pressure drop which is advantageous in applications such as vacuum<br />

condensers.<br />

Unstable Systems: Froths and Hollow Cone Atomizing<br />

Nozzles We usually think of interfacial contact as a steady-state<br />

system of raining droplets or rising bubbles, but some of the most efficient<br />

interfacial contactors take advantage of unstable interfacial<br />

geometry. The most common is the distillation tray which operates<br />

with a wild mix of bubbles, jets, films, and droplets. The mix is often<br />

described as froth. Gas pressure drop provides the energy to create<br />

the froth.<br />

A variant on the froth contact is the reverse jet contactor (Example<br />

22), which can be considered as an upside-down distillation tray, operated<br />

above the <strong>flooding</strong> velocity in cocurrent flow of gas and liquid. It<br />

is limited to one stage.<br />

An entirely different unstable contactor involves the thin expanding<br />

liquid film produced by a hollow cone spray nozzle. Because of fresh surface<br />

and the thinness of the film, this can give very high transfer for liquid-limited<br />

systems. Two applications are direct contact condensation<br />

and removal of volatile components from a high-boiling residual liquid.<br />

Surface Tension Makes Liquid Sheets and Liquid Columns<br />

Unstable Surface tension is the energy required to make an increment<br />

of interfacial surface. A sheet or column of liquid has more surface<br />

than a sphere, hence surface tension converts sheets and columns<br />

to droplets. See Fig. 14-86.<br />

There are many different atomizers, but the underlying principle of<br />

all is the same—to first generate a flat sheet or a liquid column. Liquid<br />

sheets and columns are unstable, a small surface disturbance on either<br />

will propagate, and the liquid will reshape itself into droplets. The key<br />

property in controlling this process is surface tension. Surface tension<br />

gets a high exponent in all the atomization correlations.<br />

Little Droplets and Bubbles vs. Big Droplets and Bubbles—<br />

Coalescence vs. Breakup When big drops are subjected to shear<br />

forces, as in falling rain, the droplets are distorted; and if the distor-<br />

tions are great enough, the big droplets break into little ones. This is<br />

why raindrops never exceed a certain size. A variant on this is breakup<br />

in highly turbulent systems such as in high-velocity quench systems or<br />

pneumatic nozzles. Here the droplets are distorted by the energy of<br />

the turbulent eddies.<br />

But little droplets and bubbles have more surface per unit of liquid<br />

than big ones. Hence little droplets tend to coalesce into big ones, and<br />

will grow in size if given enough quiet time.<br />

While the primary difficulty is estimating the interfacial area due to<br />

the unstable interface, a secondary problem is that freshly made,<br />

unstable surface gives higher transfer than older, more stable surface.<br />

Empirical Design Tempered by Operating Data The net of<br />

these is that interfacial area is difficult to predict and interfacial contactors<br />

are difficult to design.<br />

Prediction methods are given below but should always be tempered<br />

by operating experience.<br />

INTERFACIAL AREA—IMPACT OF DROPLET<br />

OR BUBBLE SIZE<br />

Transfer is aided by increased interfacial area. Interfacial area per unit<br />

volume aD of a single droplet or bubble is inversely proportional to the<br />

diameter of the droplet or bubble D.<br />

aD = 6/D (14-177)<br />

To estimate the total interfacial area in a given volume, the ad value is<br />

multiplied by the fractional holdup of dispersed phase in the total<br />

volume.<br />

a = aD(ΦD) (14-178)<br />

where a = interfacial area/volume and ΦD = fraction of volume in dispersed<br />

phase = holdup. Fractional holdup in a continuous process<br />

depends on the velocities of the two phases, as if they were flowing by<br />

themselves.<br />

ΦD = (dispersed phase volume)/(volume of dispersed and<br />

continuous phases)<br />

Example 14: Interfacial Area for Droplets/Gas in Cocurrent<br />

Flow For equal mass flow of gas and liquid and with gas density 0.001 of liquid<br />

density, the gas velocity in cocurrent flow will be 1000 times the liquid velocity.<br />

This sets Φ D.<br />

ΦD = 1/(1 + 1000) = 0.00099<br />

If the droplets are 500 µm in diameter, Eqs. (14-177) and (14-178) give<br />

a = (6/0.0005)(0.00099) = 12 m2 /m3 If the droplets are 100 µm in diameter, Eqs. (14-177) and (14-178) give<br />

a = (6/0.0001)(0.00099) = 60 m2 /m3 Example 15: Interfacial Area for Droplets Falling in a Vessel<br />

Droplet systems rarely exceed a ΦD value of 0.01. At this low level, ΦD in a lowvelocity<br />

countercurrent contactor can be approximated by Eq. (14-179).<br />

ΦD = UL/(Ut − UG) (14-179)<br />

where UL = liquid superficial velocity<br />

Ut = terminal velocity of droplet<br />

UG = gas superficial velocity<br />

With a gas superficial velocity of 1.5 m/s, for equal mass flow of gas and liquid,<br />

with gas density 0.001 of liquid density, and with 500-µm-diameter droplets<br />

falling at a terminal settling of 2.5 m/s, Eq. (14-179) gives a fractional holdup of<br />

liquid of<br />

ΦD = (0.001)1.5/(2.5 − 1.5) = 0.0015<br />

Equations (14-177) and (14-178) then give<br />

a = (6/0.0005)(0.0015) = 18 m 2 /m 3<br />

Example 16: Interfacial Area for Bubbles Rising in a Vessel<br />

For bubble systems (gases dispersed in liquids) fractional holdup can approach<br />

0.5 as shown by Fig. 14-104. However, before reaching this holdup, the bubble<br />

systems shift to an unstable mix of bubbles and vapor jets. Hence an exact

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!