11.07.2015 Views

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2: Cases Successfully Disposed Of in <strong>2011</strong>(cont…)Cases Resolved in <strong>2011</strong>Case Number Case Name Issues Part of CCD 2010 ProvisionsBreached<strong>2011</strong>/07/20/BC-FTD/200<strong>2011</strong>/07/20/BC-FTD/201<strong>2011</strong>/08/23/BC-FTD/202Consumer Zvs. Company BConsumer Avs. Company CConsumer Bvs. Company DOn 20-07-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Zagainst Company B, regarding the non refund of a deposit of $500.00 thatshe had paid to Company B for a vehicle worth $50,000.00. <strong>The</strong>complainant informed FCC that she returned to Company B on 15-05-11,informing Company B that she would like a refund of the deposit as she hadfound another vehicle which was much cheaper at Company X but thecompany refused to provide the refund. FCC mediated the matter and therespondent offered to refund $250.00, 50% of the deposit. <strong>The</strong> complainantwas informed of the offer and she accepted the offer. <strong>The</strong> refund was doneand both parties signed the terms of settlement.On 20-07-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Aagainst Company C. <strong>The</strong> complainant informed FCC that he had bought aticket to travel to Koro Island from Nausori. Consumer A decided to go byboat and approached Company C for a refund and the company refused.FCC formally wrote to the respondent, informing them of the issue andseeking a response. A response was received informing FCC that agovernment department was handling the issue. <strong>The</strong> above was conveyedto the complainant and the case was closed.On 23-08-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer B,regarding the purchase of a clutch plate and a pressure plate fromCompany D. <strong>The</strong> complainant informed FCC that the item was purchasedand it was sent via Air Freight to Labasa where the customer received it.<strong>The</strong> customer later reverted, claiming that the parts supplied did not matchthe specifications. <strong>The</strong> respondent was informed about the issue and theywere asked to leave the parts at the premises as the respondent would lookinto the matter. <strong>The</strong> parts were left at the respondent’s premises and theConsumerProtection &Unfair PracticesSection 88No Breach of <strong>Commerce</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>Decree 2010Division 1 -Warranty Section 115Page89of236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!