2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission
2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission
2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 2: Cases Successfully Disposed Of in <strong>2011</strong>(cont…)Cases Resolved in <strong>2011</strong>Issues Issues Issues Part of CCD2010<strong>2011</strong>/06/02/BC-FTD/136<strong>2011</strong>/06/09/BC-FTD/137<strong>2011</strong>/04/15/BC-FTD/138Consumer F vs.Company AConsumer Gvs. Company BConsumer Hvs. Company COn 02-06-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Fagainst Company A. <strong>The</strong> main issue highlighted by the Complainant wasthat Company A has repossessed the vehicle that was bought on creditfacility. Company A demanded that the Complainant clear all the balanceowed before they could release the vehicle. FCC mediated the matter andCompany A agreed to release the vehicle upon the payment of $7000. Acheque was issued to Company A and upon checking with the bank, theyfound out that there was no money in the bank. <strong>The</strong> complainant was takento the Police station for questioning. <strong>The</strong> case was closed by FCC.On 09-06-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Gagainst Company B, regarding the promotion prize of a two bedroom EziBuild house which he had won in March. Consumer G informed the<strong>Commission</strong> that after numerous correspondences by phone and emailwith Company B, there has been no legal documents’ stating ownership ofhis prize even though it has been 3 months since winning the prize. FCCformally wrote to Company B, informing them of the issue and seeking aresponse. A response was received, informing FCC that Company B hadorganized a house to be built but the complainant did not have any land.Company B further informed FCC that the complainant had applied for landthrough another institution. <strong>The</strong> above was conveyed to the complainantand the case was closed.On 15-04-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Hagainst Company C, regarding the repair of his car which was stolen anddamaged on 18-06-10. Company C had to repair the car and argued thatthe damage to the gear box was prior to the vehicle being brought forrepairs. FCC mediated the matter and Company C agreed to pay $1000 forthe damages which were not under the Motor Vehicle Insurance Policy.ProvisionsBreachedNo Breach of the <strong>Commerce</strong><strong>Commission</strong> Decree 2010ConsumerProtection &Unfair Practices<strong>2011</strong>/06/09/BC-FTD/137No Breach of the <strong>Commerce</strong><strong>Commission</strong> Decree 2010Page62of236