11.07.2015 Views

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2: Cases Successfully Disposed Of in <strong>2011</strong>(cont…)Cases Resolved in <strong>2011</strong>Issues Issues Issues Part of CCD2010<strong>2011</strong>/06/02/BC-FTD/136<strong>2011</strong>/06/09/BC-FTD/137<strong>2011</strong>/04/15/BC-FTD/138Consumer F vs.Company AConsumer Gvs. Company BConsumer Hvs. Company COn 02-06-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Fagainst Company A. <strong>The</strong> main issue highlighted by the Complainant wasthat Company A has repossessed the vehicle that was bought on creditfacility. Company A demanded that the Complainant clear all the balanceowed before they could release the vehicle. FCC mediated the matter andCompany A agreed to release the vehicle upon the payment of $7000. Acheque was issued to Company A and upon checking with the bank, theyfound out that there was no money in the bank. <strong>The</strong> complainant was takento the Police station for questioning. <strong>The</strong> case was closed by FCC.On 09-06-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Gagainst Company B, regarding the promotion prize of a two bedroom EziBuild house which he had won in March. Consumer G informed the<strong>Commission</strong> that after numerous correspondences by phone and emailwith Company B, there has been no legal documents’ stating ownership ofhis prize even though it has been 3 months since winning the prize. FCCformally wrote to Company B, informing them of the issue and seeking aresponse. A response was received, informing FCC that Company B hadorganized a house to be built but the complainant did not have any land.Company B further informed FCC that the complainant had applied for landthrough another institution. <strong>The</strong> above was conveyed to the complainantand the case was closed.On 15-04-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Hagainst Company C, regarding the repair of his car which was stolen anddamaged on 18-06-10. Company C had to repair the car and argued thatthe damage to the gear box was prior to the vehicle being brought forrepairs. FCC mediated the matter and Company C agreed to pay $1000 forthe damages which were not under the Motor Vehicle Insurance Policy.ProvisionsBreachedNo Breach of the <strong>Commerce</strong><strong>Commission</strong> Decree 2010ConsumerProtection &Unfair Practices<strong>2011</strong>/06/09/BC-FTD/137No Breach of the <strong>Commerce</strong><strong>Commission</strong> Decree 2010Page62of236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!