11.07.2015 Views

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2: Cases Successfully Disposed Of in <strong>2011</strong>(cont…)Cases Resolved in <strong>2011</strong>Case Number Case Name Issues Part of CCD2010<strong>2011</strong>/12/28/BC-FTD/319Consumer Cvs. Company Jshaft and Bulb Guider or alternatively compensating him for the cost of theKam shaft and Bulb Guider. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> mediated the matter and therespondent replaced the parts after buying them from another company.Confirmation was received from the Complainant informing the <strong>Commission</strong>that the parts had been fitted and the vehicle was running well. Based onthe above, the case was closed.On 28-12-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Cagainst Company J. <strong>The</strong> Complainant informed the <strong>Commission</strong> that anapplication was made at Company J’s Labasa office for the supply ofelectricity to Consumer C’s village. In early October, the Complainant wasinformed that a survey of the project had been sent to the Lautoka office forquotation. <strong>The</strong> Complainant waited for Company J to forward the quotationbut he did not receive it. On 30-06-11, an email was sent to theComplainant by Company J informing him that the <strong>Commission</strong> hadinstructed Company J to hold onto the quotation while the policy underwhich the quotation was being prepared was under review. <strong>The</strong><strong>Commission</strong> wrote formally to the Respondent, informing them of the issue.A response was received, informing the <strong>Commission</strong> that Company J hadcompleted the survey work for the area and an additional three houseswere added. A quotation was to be given to the spokesman based on thesurvey by the Company J team. <strong>The</strong> Company was advised not to blamethe <strong>Commission</strong> for any delays as the <strong>Commission</strong> had made a ruling. Anemail was sent to the Complainant informing him on the above and the casewas closed.ProvisionsBreachedRestrictive TradePractices Section 66Note: Missing case numbers reflect cases which were received by the <strong>Commission</strong> but not closed by the end of December <strong>2011</strong>.Page135of236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!