11.07.2015 Views

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2: Cases Successfully Disposed Of in <strong>2011</strong>(cont…)Cases Resolved in <strong>2011</strong>Case Number Case Name Issues Part of CCD 2010 ProvisionsBreached<strong>2011</strong>/12/06/BC-FTD/297<strong>2011</strong>/12/12/BC-FTD/301Consumer Rvs. Company XConsumer Svs. Company YOn 06-12-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer R regardingan advertised promotion by Company X which allowed subscribers to makeunlimited calls for $1.45 for 24 hours. <strong>The</strong> Complainant informed the <strong>Commission</strong>that Company X advertised in the local daily on 18 November <strong>2011</strong> and 2December <strong>2011</strong> regarding the subscription to unlimited calls for $1.45 for 24 hours.<strong>The</strong> Complainant subscribed on 05-12-11 for the unlimited calls for a day and wascorrectly charged. On 06-12-11, $1.45 was deducted from the Complainant’saccount without him subscribing for it. Once the complaint was received, the<strong>Commission</strong> formally wrote to Company X, informing them of the issue andseeking a response. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> received a response from Company X,stating the following; <strong>The</strong> Day Pass for 05-12-11 expired and an automatedmessage was sent to the Complainant advising him that, “Your 24 hour Day Passhas expired. Simply text PASS to 9999 for another 24 hours of free on-net calls”.On 06-12-11, $1.45 was not deducted for another Day Pass but three times thesum of $0.50 was deducted as the Complainant had subscribed to a differentservice, Textmate, by sending an SMS to a shortcode 4636; once on December 5and twice on December 6. <strong>The</strong> above was conveyed to the Complainant and thecase was closed.On 12-12-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Sagainst Company Y regarding the increase in the price of gas cylinders inthe Nadroga/Navosa Province. <strong>The</strong> Complainant informed the <strong>Commission</strong>that the price of 12kg gas cylinder ranges from $49.00 to $53.00 in theNadroga/Navosa Province and consumers are being charged on thesedifferent rates within the same vicinity. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> after making itsassessment and analysis on the matter formally wrote to the Complainant,informing him that LPG is not under Price Control and firms were free to settheir own prices. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> further notified the complainant that wewere currently monitoring the marketConsumerProtection &Unfair Practices.Section 76No Breach of <strong>Commerce</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>Decree 2010Page128of236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!