11.07.2015 Views

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2: Cases Successfully Disposed Of in <strong>2011</strong>(cont…)Cases Resolved in <strong>2011</strong>Case Number Case Name Issues Part of CCD 2010 ProvisionsBreached<strong>2011</strong>/11/09/BC-FTD/275<strong>2011</strong>//11/10/BC-FTD/276Consumer Dvs. Company JConsumer Evs. Company KOn 09-11-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Dregarding the purchase of a printer ink cartridge from Nadro Computers.<strong>The</strong> complainant informed FCC that the color and black ink cartridge waspurchased on 4 April <strong>2011</strong> from the respondent. A maximum of 12 to 15pages were printed till 5 May <strong>2011</strong> when the black ink finished. <strong>The</strong> Sametype of cartridge was purchased before from the respondent and it lasted for4 months with more than 200 pages printed. <strong>The</strong> complainant requested fora replacement which was denied. Once the complaint was lodged, FCCformally wrote to the respondent informing them of the issue and seeking aresponse. A response was received, informing FCC that the ink cartridgesold to the complainant was used for 1 month of printing and photocopyingand there were no printing or photocopying records kept by thecomplainant. <strong>The</strong> Respondent informed FCC that the ink cartridge was agenuine product from Japan and had not been used or tampered by therespondent. <strong>The</strong>re was no form of evidence on the issue to prove thecomplainant’s allegations. FCC after making its assessment and analysison the matter formally informed the complainant that FCC could not takeaction on the matter and alternatively, he may lodge a claim with the SmallClaims Tribunal to recover the sum paid to the respondent and the casewas closed.On 10-11-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Eagainst Company K for not honoring a contractual agreement made on 31October <strong>2011</strong>. <strong>The</strong> complainant informed FCC that the agreement statedthat the complainant was to pay the respondent a 10% deposit of $10,000for the hire of the vessel on 19-12-11. <strong>The</strong> said date would be the last trip toVanuabalavu before Christmas. By signing the contract, the respondentNo Breach of <strong>Commerce</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>Decree 2010Page120of236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!