11.07.2015 Views

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

2011 Annual Report - The Commerce Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2: Cases Successfully Disposed Of in <strong>2011</strong>(cont…)Cases Resolved in <strong>2011</strong>Case Number Case Name Issues Part of CCD 2010 ProvisionsBreached<strong>2011</strong>/10/14/BC-FTD/260<strong>2011</strong>/10/20/BC-FTD/261Consumer Tvs. Company XConsumer Uvs. Company YOn 14-10-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Tregarding a sales transaction with Company X. <strong>The</strong> complainant informedFCC that the respondent was given a job to design a tailor table cloth(medium and large), chair covers, serviettes and tray covers. A samplechair was provided with the expectancy of a proper job and accountabilityfor re-washing. However, upon delivery numerous errors were found. <strong>The</strong>Respondent was informed that the chair cover was too short and notappealing. Upon washing, the fabric shrunk and the batch had to bereplaced. <strong>The</strong> Respondent demanded payments for an outstanding sum of$1,700.00 and the complainant informed the respondent that full paymentwould be made once the job was completed. <strong>The</strong> Respondent disagreedand a demand notice was sent to the complainant from a law firm. FCCformally wrote to the respondent informing them of the issue and seeking aresponse. A response was received from the respondent, informing FCCthat the matter was before the court and a demand notice had been issuedto the complainant. <strong>The</strong> above was conveyed to the complainant and thecase was closed.On 20-10-11, the <strong>Commission</strong> received a complaint from Consumer Uagainst Company Y for the non-reimbursement of his claim on thesurrender value of his insurance policy. <strong>The</strong> complainant informed FCC thatCompany Y’s Agent who registered his application had misled him bystating that he was registered under a 10 year insurance policy but he cameto know later that it was a 20 year policy. Company Y’s Agent informed himthat he could also withdraw his funds within the 10 year period. Uponlodging a withdrawal for his policy with Company Y he was only offered onethird of the total sum that he had paid. FCC formally wrote to theDivision 1 -Warranty Section 114ConsumerProtection&UnfairPracticesSection 76Page113of236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!