Sampling comparison among Hirst spore traps of the same model

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Material and methods• Place of sampling: Faculty of Science inBadajoz, University of Extremadura, Spain• Time of sampling: 51 days– from 27 th January to 18 th March 2011• Adhesive: White Petrolatum– petroleum jelly, soft paraffin, vaseline,CAS number 8009-03-8• Four longitudinal scansat 400x LM magnification• Spore traps were calibrated atthe beginning of the samplingBadajoz *Sampling comparison Hirst spore traps 6
ºC Tempmm RainPeriod studiedSampling period of Spore Traps (ST)ST1ST2ST3ST4ST-T27-1 6-2 16-2 26-2 8-3 18-3|------ 27/1-15/2:20 days ------| |- 16/2-1/3: 14 days -| |---- 2/3-18/3:17 days ------|30253025202015101551005-5027-1 6-2 16-2 26-2 8-3 18-3Rain Temp Tmax TminSampling period studied and meteorology.Badajoz 2011Sampling comparison Hirst spore traps 7
Page 1 and 2: Sampling comparison among Hirstspor
Page 3 and 4: Objectives• The aims is to evalua
Page 5: SamplersMet ST1 ST2 ST4 ST3Meteorol
Page 9 and 10: Spore traps locationNUniversity of
Page 11 and 12: grains/m3grains/m3grains/m3grains/m
Page 13 and 14: grains/m3mm RainTotal daily pollen
Page 15 and 16: Hourly comparisonsCupressaceae 10-1
Page 17 and 18: m/s Wind Vel.Grades Wind Dir.grains
Page 23 and 24: Sampling comparison among Hirstspor

Sampling comparison among Hirst spore traps of the same model

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?