Sampling comparison among Hirst spore traps of the same model

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Material and methodsSTT• 5 seven-day Burkardsamplers at the sameplace– 1 sampler at 15 m over aterrace: STT– 4 samplers at ground levelseparated 2 m each other:ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4– At least 3 samplers atground level were workingsimultaneously– 1 automatic meteorologicalstation at ground level: MetMet ST1 ST2 ST3 ST4Faculty ofScienceUniversity ofExtremadura10 mST1-4 MetSTTExperimentalGardenSampling comparison Hirst spore traps 4
SamplersMet ST1 ST2 ST4 ST3Meteorological station on the left and the four sporetraps at the experimental garden on the rightSampling comparison Hirst spore traps 5
Page 1 and 2: Sampling comparison among Hirstspor
Page 3: Objectives• The aims is to evalua
Page 7 and 8: ºC Tempmm RainPeriod studiedSampli
Page 9 and 10: Spore traps locationNUniversity of
Page 11 and 12: grains/m3grains/m3grains/m3grains/m
Page 13 and 14: grains/m3mm RainTotal daily pollen
Page 15 and 16: Hourly comparisonsCupressaceae 10-1
Page 17 and 18: m/s Wind Vel.Grades Wind Dir.grains
Page 23 and 24: Sampling comparison among Hirstspor

Sampling comparison among Hirst spore traps of the same model

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?