Sampling comparison among Hirst spore traps of the same model
Sampling comparison among Hirst spore traps of the same model Sampling comparison among Hirst spore traps of the same model
Material and methodsSTT• 5 seven-day Burkardsamplers at the sameplace– 1 sampler at 15 m over aterrace: STT– 4 samplers at ground levelseparated 2 m each other:ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4– At least 3 samplers atground level were workingsimultaneously– 1 automatic meteorologicalstation at ground level: MetMet ST1 ST2 ST3 ST4Faculty ofScienceUniversity ofExtremadura10 mST1-4 MetSTTExperimentalGardenSampling comparison Hirst spore traps 4
SamplersMet ST1 ST2 ST4 ST3Meteorological station on the left and the four sporetraps at the experimental garden on the rightSampling comparison Hirst spore traps 5
- Page 1 and 2: Sampling comparison among Hirstspor
- Page 3: Objectives• The aims is to evalua
- Page 7 and 8: ºC Tempmm RainPeriod studiedSampli
- Page 9 and 10: Spore traps locationNUniversity of
- Page 11 and 12: grains/m3grains/m3grains/m3grains/m
- Page 13 and 14: grains/m3mm RainTotal daily pollen
- Page 15 and 16: Hourly comparisonsCupressaceae 10-1
- Page 17 and 18: m/s Wind Vel.Grades Wind Dir.grains
- Page 19 and 20: m/s Wind Vel.Grades Wind Dir.grains
- Page 21 and 22: m/s Wind Vel.Grades Wind Dir.grains
- Page 23 and 24: Sampling comparison among Hirstspor
Material and methodsSTT• 5 seven-day Burkardsamplers at <strong>the</strong> <strong>same</strong>place– 1 sampler at 15 m over aterrace: STT– 4 samplers at ground levelseparated 2 m each o<strong>the</strong>r:ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4– At least 3 samplers atground level were workingsimultaneously– 1 automatic meteorologicalstation at ground level: MetMet ST1 ST2 ST3 ST4Faculty <strong>of</strong>ScienceUniversity <strong>of</strong>Extremadura10 mST1-4 MetSTTExperimentalGarden<strong>Sampling</strong> <strong>comparison</strong> <strong>Hirst</strong> <strong>spore</strong> <strong>traps</strong> 4
Change language