Sampling comparison among Hirst spore traps of the same model

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Daily data comparisonsTotal Cupresaceae Ulmust df sig. t df sig. t df sig.ST1-ST2 1,999 19 0,060 0,834 19 0,415 0,983 19 0,338ST1-ST4 1,908 19 0,072 -0,969 19 0,345 -1,057 19 0,304ST1-STT 3,096 19 0,006 1,743 19 0,097 2,581 19 0,018ST2-ST3 -0,197 13 0,847 0,159 13 0,876 -0,567 13 0,580ST2-ST4 0,359 33 0,722 -0,910 33 0,370 0,193 33 0,848ST2-STT 2,204 33 0,035 1,893 33 0,067 2,472 33 0,019ST3-ST4 1,382 30 0,177 0,852 30 0,401 1,615 30 0,117ST3-STT 2,155 30 0,039 2,141 30 0,040 3,412 30 0,002ST4-STT 2,827 50 0,007 3,562 50 0,001 3,534 50 0,001T-test paired comparisons after data normalization using logarithmic transformation,In bold statistically significant differences. Degree of freedom: df=n-1.ST1-4: Spore traps at ground levelSTT: Spore trap over the terraceSampling comparison Hirst spore traps 12
grains/m3mm RainTotal daily pollen variationTotal Pollen50045040035030025020015010050027-1 30-1 2-2 5-2 8-2 11-2 14-2 17-2 20-2 23-2 26-2 1-3 4-3 7-3 10-3 13-3 16-3302520151050Rain ST1 ST2 ST3 ST4 ST-TTotal daily pollen concentration for the period studied including all the spore trapsdaily rain appears scaled in the right sideSampling comparison Hirst spore traps 13
Page 1 and 2: Sampling comparison among Hirstspor
Page 3 and 4: Objectives• The aims is to evalua
Page 5 and 6: SamplersMet ST1 ST2 ST4 ST3Meteorol
Page 7 and 8: ºC Tempmm RainPeriod studiedSampli
Page 9 and 10: Spore traps locationNUniversity of
Page 11: grains/m3grains/m3grains/m3grains/m
Page 15 and 16: Hourly comparisonsCupressaceae 10-1
Page 17 and 18: m/s Wind Vel.Grades Wind Dir.grains
Page 23 and 24: Sampling comparison among Hirstspor

Sampling comparison among Hirst spore traps of the same model

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?