Educational - Ozean Publications

More documents

Recommendations

Info

European Journal of <strong>Educational</strong> Studies 2(2), 2010Right Hand Grip: As a result of statistical analysis, average right hand grip value of youngs participated in thisstudy in experiment group (35.02 ± 7.432 kg) was found higher when compared to average right hand grip value ofyoungs in control group (30.98 ± 5.279 kg) .Right hand grip measurement difference of experiment and controlgroup was found insignificant.Left Hand Grip: As a result of statistical analysis, average left hand grip value of youngs participated in this studyin experiment group (33.16 ± 6.690 kg) was found higher when compared to average right hand grip value of youngsin control group (30.98 ± 5.279 kg) .Stop and Long Jump: As a result of statistical analysis, average stop and long jump value of youngs participated inthis study in experiment group (1.95 ± 0.161 cm) was found higher when compared to average stop and long jumpvalue of youngs in control group (1.57 ± 0.251 cm) .Vertical Jump: As a result of statistical analysis , average vertical jump value of youngs participated in this studyin experiment group (57.80 ± 6.312 cm) was found higher when compared to average vertical jump value ofyoungs in control group (49.35 ± 7.110 cm). Vertical jump measurement difference of experiment and control groupwas found significant.Shoulder Width: As a result of statistical analysis, average shoulder width value of youngs participated in this studyin experiment group (96.55 ± 5.175 cm) was found higher when compared to average shoulder width value ofyoungs in control group (95.10 ± 4.024 cm) .Shoulder width measurement difference of experiment and controlgroup was found insignificant.Waist Circumference: As a result of statistical analysis, average waist circumference value of youngs participatedin this study in experiment group (69.95 ± 4.605 cm) was found higher when compared to average waistcircumference value of youngs in control group (69.65 ± 4.319 cm) .Waist circumference measurement differenceof experiment and control group was found insignificant.Hip Circumference: As a result of statistical analysis, average hip circumference value of youngs participated inthis study in experiment group (87.65 ± 5.193 cm) was found higher when compared to average hip circumferencevalue of youngs in control group (87.50 ± 5.907 cm) .Hip circumference measurement difference of experiment andcontrol group was found insignificant.Biceps Flexion Circumference : As a result of statistical analysis, average biceps flexion circumference value ofyoungs participated in this study in experiment group (22.85 ± 1.725 cm) was found higher when compared toaverage biceps flexion circumference value of youngs in control group (22.55 ± 1.190 cm) .Biceps flexioncircumference measurement difference of experiment and control group was found insignificant.Biceps Extention Circumference: As a result of statistical analysis, average biceps extention circumference valueof youngs participated in this study in experiment group (25.85 ± 2.412 cm) was found higher when compared toaverage biceps extention circumference value of youngs in control group (25.60 ± 1.273 cm) .Biceps extentioncircumference measurement difference of experiment and control group was found insignificant.Forearm Flexion Circumference: As a result of statistical analysis, average forearm flexion circumference value ofyoungs participated in this study in experiment group (23.10 ± 1.447 cm) was found higher when compared toaverage forearm flexion circumference value of youngs in control group (22.55 ± 1.190 cm) .Forearm flexioncircumference measurement difference of experiment and control group was found insignificant.Forearm Extention Circumference: As a result of statistical analysis , average forearm extention circumferencevalue of youngs participated in this study in experiment group (24.24 ± 1.446 cm) was found higher whencompared to average forearm extention circumference value of youngs in control group (23.70 ± 1.128 cm).Forearm extention circumference measurement difference of experiment and control group was found insignificantThigh Circumference: As a result of statistical analysis, average thigh circumference value of youngs participatedin this study in experiment group (43.65 ± 3.087 cm) was found higher when compared to average thighcircumference value of youngs in control group (42.80 ± 3.302 cm) .Thigh circumference measurement differenceof experiment and control group was found insignificantCalf Circumference: As a result of statistical analysis, average calf circumference value of youngs participated inthis study in experiment group (33.40 ± 2.062 cm was found lower when compared to average calf135
European Journal of <strong>Educational</strong> Studies 2(2), 2010circumference value of youngs in control group (33.65 ± 1.954 cm) .Calf circumference measurement difference ofexperiment and control group was found insignificantBody fat percentage : As a result of statistical analysis, average body fat percentage value of youngs participatedin this study in experiment group (16.92 ± 4.083 %) was found lower when compared to average body fatpercentage value of youngs in control group (19.78 ± 4.225 %) . Body fat percentage measurement differenceof experiment and control group was found significantDISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONAt this stuy, it was aimed to determine some biomotoric features of 14 years old youngs exercising in a Professionalfootball team’s junior team at least three years and 14 years old youngs not exercising ,and to search how trainingeffects on 14 years old youngs’ physical structure and biomotoric features.For children and young athletes, with growth and maturation occurring in the body structure and sporty performancechanges were examined in various studies,ýt is indicated that growth, performance and body biomotor developmentsmay lead to some different kinds of developments.The relationship between development and motor performance in general depends on anthropometric factors and isrecognized as an important element in performance (Kalkavan, A.1999 )Loko and his colleagues, indicated that 10-17 age children who do regular exercise were faster than children with thesame age and sex.(Loko J, Aule R, Sikkut T, Ereline J, Viru A.2000)Saçaklı, in his study with 14 years old footballers, found 30 m sprint average as 4,65 second (Saçaklı,M.1998 )Kien and his colleagues found that 10-12 age children participated in recreation programme were faster than thechildren who didnot participate in recreational sports activities. These studies were parallel with the studies identifiedin.(Kien,C.L.2003).In this study, statistically a significant difference was observed in the value of verticaljump.Saygýn found a significant difference between the children who were active and who werenot.( Saygın,Ö.2003)Our findings shows parallelism with the search results in which Hofman and his colleagues found statisticallysignificant differences in vertical jump parameters of 12-14 years old children who had movementtraining.(Hofman,J.R. Stavisky,H.Falk,B.1995) Flexibility measurement difference of experiment and control groupswas found significant in this study.Yenal and his collegues,in their studies on 10-11 age children found significantdifference in experiment group when compared to control group in terms of flexibility. (Yenal, T.H, Çamlıyer H,Saraçoğlu A.S.1999)Saygın found significant difference between children whose activity level is lighter and medium in terms offlexibility.(Saygın, Ö. Polat, Y. Karacabey K.2005) . These studies are overlapping with the studies done.Stop andjump measurement difference of experiment and control groups was found significant Regular training has a positiveaffect on physical development of 14 years old young group and it increases stop and jum measurement data of youngswho are more developed as physical (height,weight) and it was thought that it may have a significant difference affecton14 years old youngs stop and jump in experiment and control group.In Metiner and Ulug’s studies on children, they indicated an important relationship between stop and longjump,physical structure and height (Metiner G, Uluğ Y1993). These results were parallel with the studies done. Ofexperimental and control group, the right hand grip, left hand grip, diameter and circumferences measurementdifference was found insignificant..Regular football –specific training has no effect on having significant difference in diameter and circumferences, butthe effection may be cause of developments in puberty period.As a result, changes occurring beacuse of the growth, maturation in 14 footballers,children and youngs’ sportyperformance,body structure ,developments in their biomotoric features are not only because of the training but alsobecause of their development period.136
Page 1 and 2:
EuropeanJournalofEducationalStudies
Page 3 and 4:
Europan Journal ofEducationalScienc
Page 5 and 6:
European Journal of Educational Stu
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
QUALITYEuropean Journal of Educatio
Page 29 and 30:
GENERAL IMAGEEuropean Journal of Ed
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38: European Journal of Educational Stu
Page 87: European Journal of Educational Stu
Page 137: European Journal of Educational Stu
show all

Educational - Ozean Publications

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?