Budget Highlights Book - DON FM&C Website - U.S. Navy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

February 2010Rebalancing Investment to Meet Global Requirementssoftware for critical HM&E and Combat Systems integral to land based testing and,subsequently, HM&E and Combat Systems trials on the lead ship. Research anddevelopment efforts in FY 2011 also support the continued development,qualification and testing for the Long Range Land Attack Projectile (LRLAP) whichwill be used with the Advanced Gun System (AGS). LRLAP will deliver a highexplosive unitary payload with Global Positioning System (GPS) accuracy.LCSThe Department’s FY2011 budget includes $226 million in FY 2011 for LCS researchand development. This funding will support a multitude of activities ranging fromfinal contract trials and Post Shakedown Availability (PSA) planning on LCS 1 and2, to developmental and operational testing of LCS 1 and 2 with the MineCountermeasures (MCM) and Surface Warfare (SUW) mission packages.CG(X)The Department proposes to terminate the CG(X) program. This decision wasdriven by affordability considerations. Instead of procuring CG(X), the Navy isconsidering other options including maturing the air and missile defense radarprogram and using technologies from other similar kinds of ships such as DDG‐1000and DDG‐51 destroyers.VA ClassVirginia Class research and development effortscontinue to focus on cost reduction efforts,operational evaluation testing, development ofsonar, combat control, and electronic supportsystems, and submarine multi‐mission teamtrainer efforts. The FY 2011 budget of $155 millionfunds bow array efforts, integrated low pressureelectrolyzer development, system level andsubsystem improvements to Virginia Classelectronic systems, and Block IV Reduced Total Ownership Costs.OHIO ReplacementContinuing in FY 2011, the department has budgeted $672 million, which representsa significant increase in funding for the Ohio Class submarine replacement program(SSBN(X)). Research and development efforts will focus on the propulsion plant,missile compartment development, and platform development technologies like thepropulsor, electric actuation, maneuvering/ship control, and signatures. TheseFY 2011 Department of the Navy Budget 5–7
February 2010Rebalancing Investment to Meet Global Requirementsfunds provide for joint development of missile launch technologies in support oflongstanding bilateral agreements with the United Kingdom. These RDT&E effortsare critical to meeting required procurement and delivery dates needed to supportthe OHIO replacement program.AVIATION PROGRAMSAircraft ProgramsNavy and Marine Corps aviation continues to provideforward deployed air presence in support of ournational strategy. Positioned to support the jointwarfighter, the FY 2011 budget provides the Departmentwith the best balance of naval aviation requirements.The Navy’s aircraft procurement plan continues todecrease the average age of the aircraft inventory. Froma high above 20 years in the 1990’s, the average age hasdecreased to 19.1 years in 2009. Multi‐year aircraftprocurement contracts for MH‐60R/S and MV‐22Bcontinue to provide significant savings and stretchavailable procurement funds. The next MH‐60R/Smission systems and common cockpit multi‐yearprocurement contract starts in FY 2011. Developmentfunding continues for F‐35, P‐8A, CH‐53K, and Broad Area Maritime Surveillance(BAMS) Unmanned Aerial System (UAS).5–8 FY 2011 Department of the Navy Budget
Page 2:
February 2010Highlights of the Depa
Page 5 and 6:
February 2010Weapons Procurement, N
Page 7 and 8:
February 2010This page left blank i
Page 9 and 10:
Rebalancing to Meet Priorities Febr
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
February 2010Integrating Sustained
Page 27 and 28:
February 2010Integrating Sustained
Page 29 and 30: February 2010Integrating Sustained
Page 31 and 32: February 2010Integrating Sustained
Page 33 and 34: Shaping a Full‐Spectrum Naval For
Page 49 and 50: Protecting Readiness to Meet Today
Page 75 and 76: February 2010Rebalancing Investment
Page 79: February 2010Rebalancing Investment
Page 111 and 112: Revitalizing the Force Ashore Febru
Page 127 and 128: Improving Performance February 2010
Page 129 and 130: Improving Performance February 2010
Page 131 and 132:
Improving Performance February 2010
Page 133 and 134:
Improving Performance February 2010
Page 135 and 136:
Financial Summary February 2010Fina
Page 137 and 138:
Financial Summary February 2010Deri
Page 139 and 140:
Financial Summary February 2010This
Page 141 and 142:
Appropriation Tables February 2010M
Page 143 and 144:
Appropriation Tables February 2010R
Page 145 and 146:
Appropriation Tables February 2010O
Page 147 and 148:
Appropriation Tables February 2010O
Page 149 and 150:
Appropriation Tables February 2010A
Page 151 and 152:
Appropriation Tables February 2010S
Page 153 and 154:
Appropriation Tables February 2010P
Page 155 and 156:
Appropriation Tables February 2010R
Page 157 and 158:
Appropriation Tables February 2010M
Page 159 and 160:
Appropriation Tables February 2010B
Page 161 and 162:
Appropriation Tables February 2010T
Page 163 and 164:
List of Acronyms February 2010ECV
Page 165:
List of Acronyms February 2010R&M
show all

Budget Highlights Book - DON FM&C Website - U.S. Navy

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?