Climate Change and Tourism - UNEP - Division of Technology ...
Climate Change and Tourism - UNEP - Division of Technology ...
Climate Change and Tourism - UNEP - Division of Technology ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9.2 Adaptation to <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong><br />
9.2.1 Overview<br />
UNWTO, 9 July 2008<br />
Impacts <strong>and</strong> Adaptation at <strong>Tourism</strong> Destinations<br />
“It is meaningless to study the consequences <strong>of</strong> climate change without considering the ranges <strong>of</strong><br />
adaptive responses.”<br />
Adger <strong>and</strong> Kelly (1999)<br />
The IPCC 412 indicated that the need for societies around the world <strong>and</strong> economic sectors like tourism<br />
to adapt to climate change in the decades ahead is inescapable. The inevitability <strong>of</strong> the need to adapt to<br />
future climate change <strong>and</strong> the realization that adaptation is occurring today partially explains why there<br />
has been an explosion <strong>of</strong> research <strong>and</strong> policy interest in adaptation to climate change over the past five<br />
years. 413 Adaptation has figured less prominently in climate change research on tourism than in some<br />
other economic sectors (e.g., agriculture) <strong>and</strong> remains an important knowledge gap, particularly with<br />
respect to destinations. 414<br />
Adaptation to climate change refers to an adjustment in natural or human systems in response to actual<br />
or expected climatic stimuli or their effects, which moderates harm or exploits beneficial opportunities.<br />
Adaptation can be pursued by societies, institutions, individuals, governments. It is motivated by<br />
economic, social or environmental drivers, by many means, for example social activities, market<br />
activities, local or global interventions. 415 The implementation <strong>of</strong> adaptation measures in the tourism<br />
sector should consider the time horizon <strong>of</strong> climate change impacts which is illustrated in Figure 13.1.<br />
The information requirements, policy changes <strong>and</strong> investments that are required for effective adaptation<br />
by tourism destinations will require decades in some cases, <strong>and</strong> therefore the process <strong>of</strong> adaptation<br />
needs to commence in the very near future for destinations anticipated to be among those impacted by<br />
mid-century.<br />
Figure 9.9 Relative adaptive capacity <strong>of</strong> major tourism sub-sectors<br />
Tourists Tour operators, transport<br />
providers (railways, airlines),<br />
travel agents<br />
Hotels/resorts,<br />
attraction<br />
operators,<br />
communities<br />
HIGH Adaptive capacity LOW<br />
Source: Scott, D. <strong>and</strong> Jones, B. (2006a)<br />
The dynamic nature <strong>of</strong> the tourism industry <strong>and</strong> its ability to cope with a range <strong>of</strong> recent shocks,<br />
including SARS, terrorism attacks in a number <strong>of</strong> nations, or the Asian tsunami, suggests a relatively high<br />
climate change adaptive capacity within the tourism industry overall. The capacity to adapt to climate<br />
change is thought to vary between the sub-sectors <strong>of</strong> the tourism industry. 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421 Figure<br />
9.9 illustrates the relative adaptive capacity <strong>of</strong> major sub-sectors. Tourists have the greatest adaptive<br />
capacity (depending three key resources; money, knowledge <strong>and</strong> time) with relative freedom to avoid<br />
destinations impacted by climate change or shifting the timing <strong>of</strong> travel to avoid unfavourable climate<br />
conditions. The implications <strong>of</strong> their potential adaptations to climate change are discussed in Chapter 10.<br />
Suppliers <strong>of</strong> tourism services <strong>and</strong> tourism operators at specific destinations have less adaptive capacity.<br />
Large tour operators, who do not own the infrastructure, are in a better position to adapt to changes at<br />
destinations because they can respond to clients dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> provide information to influence clients’<br />
travel choices. Destination communities <strong>and</strong> tourism operators with large investments in immobile<br />
capital assets (e.g., hotel, resort complex, marina, or casino) have the least adaptive capacity.<br />
81