Climate Change and Tourism - UNEP - Division of Technology ...
Climate Change and Tourism - UNEP - Division of Technology ...
Climate Change and Tourism - UNEP - Division of Technology ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
48 <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> – Responding to Global Challenges<br />
8.2 Advances in the Underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> Global <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong><br />
The methods used to explore future climate shows that the uncertainties are linked to research tools<br />
currently available <strong>and</strong> some others to the evolution <strong>of</strong> human activities over the span <strong>of</strong> several decades<br />
(e.g., population <strong>and</strong> economic growth, evolution <strong>and</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> new technology). <strong>Climate</strong><br />
being a statistic <strong>of</strong> daily weather over a long period implies that it is necessary to work with statistics,<br />
trends, indicators <strong>of</strong> variability, <strong>and</strong> confidence levels, all <strong>of</strong> which make it difficult to deliver clear<br />
messages to diverse audiences.<br />
Two types <strong>of</strong> approaches can be used to describe the nature <strong>of</strong> potential future climate change.<br />
Scenarios<br />
Scenarios are the main method used to explore the future <strong>of</strong> climate. In order to develop future climate<br />
scenarios, the future <strong>of</strong> GHG emissions from human activities need to be considered. Two categories <strong>of</strong><br />
GHG emission scenarios must be distinguished; those that do not consider policies to mitigate emissions<br />
(e.g., IPCC Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES)) <strong>and</strong> those that do (i.e., stabilisation scenarios).<br />
The IPCC SRES scenarios are classified into four families according to their global-regional <strong>and</strong> the<br />
development-environmental orientations:<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
The A1 storyline <strong>and</strong> scenario family describes a future world with very rapid economic growth,<br />
low population growth, <strong>and</strong> the rapid introduction <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> more efficient technologies.<br />
The A2 storyline <strong>and</strong> scenario family describes a very heterogeneous world. The underlying theme<br />
is self-reliance <strong>and</strong> preservation <strong>of</strong> local identities.<br />
The B1 storyline <strong>and</strong> scenario family describes a convergent world with the same low population<br />
growth as in the A1 storyline, but with rapid changes in economic structures toward a service <strong>and</strong><br />
information economy, with reductions in material intensity, <strong>and</strong> the introduction <strong>of</strong> clean <strong>and</strong><br />
resource-efficient technologies.<br />
The B2 storyline <strong>and</strong> scenario family describes a world in which the emphasis is on local solutions<br />
to economic, social, <strong>and</strong> environmental sustainability.<br />
The different GHG emission trajectories over the 21st century from these SRES scenarios are outlined<br />
in Figure 8.2.<br />
When the SRES emission scenarios are run through several extensively validated Global <strong>Climate</strong><br />
Models (GCMs), the estimated range <strong>of</strong> global warming is 1.8° C to 4.0° C by the end <strong>of</strong> the 21st<br />
century. 165 This range is due to the uncertainty about future GHG emissions linked to unpredictable<br />
socio-economic conditions <strong>and</strong> to the different responses <strong>of</strong> GCMs to the same amount <strong>of</strong> emissions.<br />
Thus, these scenarios deliver results that policy makers sometimes find difficult to use. Often, policy<br />
makers want to know what they need to do in order to keep climate change within boundaries that they<br />
perceive as ‘acceptable’. This is a question to which stabilisation scenarios are more suited to provide<br />
an answer.<br />
UNWTO, 9 July 2008