24.11.2012 Views

Climate Change and Tourism - UNEP - Division of Technology ...

Climate Change and Tourism - UNEP - Division of Technology ...

Climate Change and Tourism - UNEP - Division of Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

UNWTO, 9 July 2008<br />

Emission Calcultations<br />

Table A2.3 Distance factor <strong>and</strong> final operational emission factor for the different air transport<br />

markets<br />

Market Average one-way<br />

(km)<br />

Distance factor<br />

(–)<br />

Emission factor (ISA,<br />

plus wind) (kg/pkm)<br />

Same day 600 1.50 0.177<br />

Domestic 1396 1.17 0.138<br />

Intra-regional 1938 1.06 0.125<br />

Inter-regional 7006 1.05 0.124<br />

International 3801 n/a 0.124<br />

However, there is another effect we should reckon with: the relation between distance flown <strong>and</strong><br />

emission factor is not linear. That means that if for a market the average distance is used, the deviation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the emission factor, at for example 30% lower than the average, is larger than the deviation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

emission factor at 30% above the average distance. Therefore, the operational average emission factor<br />

will be a bit higher. Furthermore, we know the overall emissions (515 Mt) <strong>and</strong> distance by air (3,984<br />

billion pkm), <strong>and</strong> thus the average emission factor (0.129 kg/pkm). As the initial emission factors – found<br />

with the data given above – was a bit too low, we calculated a correction factor that thus also accounts<br />

for the nonlinearity <strong>and</strong> for the impact that part <strong>of</strong> the flights consist <strong>of</strong> more legs with shorter average<br />

distances, <strong>and</strong> thus generally higher emission factors. This factor was found to be 1.013. Table A2.3 <strong>and</strong><br />

Figure A2.1 give the final results.<br />

Figure A2.1 Emission factors as function <strong>of</strong> average one-way distance<br />

Emission factor (kg/pkm; ISA, wind correction)<br />

0,25<br />

0,20<br />

0,15<br />

0,10<br />

0,05<br />

Source: Peeters, P. et al. (2007a)<br />

0<br />

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000<br />

One way distance (km)<br />

Data fitted Data Peeters et al. (2007)<br />

Current radiative forcing data are based on all aviation emissions, including military emissions, which<br />

thus need to be deducted from the total. Linearly interpolated from Penner et al. (1999: table 9.4) 757 ,<br />

the share <strong>of</strong> military fuel consumption was 12.2% in 2005. However, for non-CO 2 RF only part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> high altitude cruise flight is relevant because military flights usually take place at low altitudes.<br />

As the RFI is 1.9 758 for all aviation, the military correction factor will be ((1.0 – 0.122) + 0.9)/1.9=0.93.<br />

The share <strong>of</strong> tourism aviation <strong>of</strong> all aviation CO 2 emissions would consequently be 73%.<br />

195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!