how to raise the phone bill of the average new jersey family

More documents

Recommendations

Info

And CloseCall America is only a small operation with an estimated $8.9 million in sales nationwide, hardly aviable competitor to Verizon.When California Policymakers Examined the Results of Four Years of Landline Deregulation in that State, TheyFound that There Still Was Little Real Competition. The report by the California Senate Rules Committeefound that California’s two largest phone companies -- AT&T and Verizon -- together control 85 percent of thestate’s residential landline phones. “All the evidence points to the existence of market dominance by AT&T andVerizon, which allows them to raise prices without losing market shares.” 47Even where two viable competitors exist, many analysts don’t find that competition delivers effective pricecompetition to protect consumers. Such “duopoly” markets lead to what analysts at The Utility Reform Networkidentified as “price leadership”, where:[A]lternative providers simply follow the price actions of the dominant telephone companies. Observedpricing reflects the actions of firms that recognize that consumers have little choice, and the result has beendramatic rate increases for many consumers.” 48With just a few choices in most markets, such limited competition in these markets end up prone to pricematching and collusion rather than real price competition.WIRELESS AND VOIP SERVICES ARE NOT A COMPETITIVE SUBSTITUTE FORWIRELINE TELEPHONE SERVICESOne of the most ideological aspects of S 2664 is that it declares that local phone markets are “competitive”where there are wireless phone services available—de facto requiring deregulation of lan line phone servicesthroughout the state.Yet, Almost All Evidence Indicates that Wireless Phone Services are Not an Adequate Substitute for ExistingLandline Services, either in providing an affordable alternative or in providing the services many landline usersneed.In California, where a similar assumption was made in regulatory policy, The Utility Reform Network in its2010 report found that neither wireless, nor competitive local exchange carriers, nor VoIP technologies “offerthe overwhelming majority of consumers a reasonable means to substitute for the local telephone services…There are numerous reasons to believe that because of these limitations on choice, market forces are notsufficient to protect consumers from market power.” 49In fact, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has itself found that wireless providers, “rather thanproviding a complete substitute for traditional wireline service…largely provide mobile wireless telephonyservice to a customer’s existing wireline service.” 50Notably, in a 2009 report, the National Center for Health Statistics found that New Jersey had one of thelowest rates of “wireless-only” households (8 percent of households) compared to an average of 14.7 percentof households in the nation as a whole, indicating that for many state residents, wireless is not an adequatesubstitute and traditional landline service provides value to consumers, whether because of price or servicequality. 51Since families where members are over age 65 are strongly correlated with being dependent on landline services,S 2664 will have a disproportionate effect on the elderly in New Jersey. 52Wireless is Not an Adequate Substitute for Multiple Reasons. Wireless plans are much more expensive thanwireline services, so they do not provide a pricing constraint on landline services. Wireless coverage varies basedon terrain, foliage and building structure and cannot guarantee calls made indoors. Signal strength varies fordifferent locations. 53 Note that Verizon itself in its Verizon Wireless Customer Agreement makes clear thatquality of wireless is not as dependable as landline service:“Wireless devices use radio transmissions, so unfortunately you can’t get Service if your device isn’t in rangeof a transmission signal. And please be aware that even within your Coverage Area, many things can affectthe availability and quality of your Service, including network capacity, your device, terrain, buildings,foliage and weather.”13 How To Raise The Phone Bill Of The Average New Jersey Family: What S 2664 Will Do To NJ Consumers
Similarly, VoIP services provided over broadband services are not a cost-effective alternative for consumersdependent on landline services. Additionally, since VoIP services require electricity, they do not guaranteeservice during power outages that the legacy phone services do. While some cable VoIP services do often providebattery backup, they often have limitations. 54 Many services such as TIVO and other services requiring dial-upservices do not work with VoIP, including alarm monitoring services and home health care monitoring systems.Nathan Newman | Richard Brodsky 14
Page 1 and 2: H O W T O R A I S E T H E P H O N E
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTSExecutive Summary
Page 5 and 6: »»However, Regulatory Oversight A
Page 8: S 2664 Deregulates the Whole Landli
Page 13 and 14: HOW STRONG REGULATORY SUPERVISION O
Page 15: V. S 2664’S RUSH TO DEREGULATE IS
Page 19 and 20: APPENDIXLOW-INCOME LIFELINE TELEPHO
Page 21 and 22: RESIDENTIAL TELEPHONE RATES IN SAMP
Page 23 and 24: BROADBAND SPEED DOWNLOADS GREATER T
Page 25 and 26: ENDNOTES1. Reference Book of Rates,
Page 28: 220 Fifth Ave., 2nd Floor | New Yor

how to raise the phone bill of the average new jersey family

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?