<strong>India</strong>:No democracy for those living on the margins8There should be a technical cooperation programmes for implementation of the ILOConvention No. 107 relating to indigenous <strong>and</strong> tribal peoples including increasingsensitivity of the judiciary on the rights of indigenous <strong>and</strong> tribal peoples.IV. Cooperation with HRC, Treaty Bodies <strong>and</strong> OHCHRThe government failed to ratify Convention against Torture <strong>and</strong> Other Cruel, Inhuman orDegrading Treatment or Punishment, International Convention for the Protection of AllPersons from Enforced Disappearance, <strong>and</strong> the ILO Convention No 169 on <strong>Indigenous</strong><strong>and</strong> <strong>Tribal</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> in Independent Countries.The government of <strong>India</strong> has so far failed to extend open invitation <strong>and</strong> specificinvitations to many Special Procedures including Special Rapporteur on the situation ofhuman rights <strong>and</strong> fundamental freedoms on indigenous peoples.The periodic report to the Human Rights Committee has been pending since December2001. The government has also failed to implement the recommendations of the TreatyBodies.______________________________________________________________________________[A joint submission of IWGIA <strong>and</strong> AITPN for examination of <strong>India</strong>’s human rightsobligations <strong>and</strong> commitments under the UPR of the Human Rights Council]
<strong>India</strong>:No democracy for those living on the margins92. Situation of indigenous <strong>and</strong> tribal peoples on the groundI. L<strong>and</strong> alienationThe 5 th Schedule to the Constitution of <strong>India</strong> protects the l<strong>and</strong> rights of the tribals inmainl<strong>and</strong> <strong>India</strong> <strong>and</strong> the 6 th Schedule authorizes some of the Autonomous DistrictCouncils in the North East <strong>India</strong> to make appropriate laws against l<strong>and</strong> alienation subjectto approval by the Governor of the concerned State. In addition, there are State level lawsto protect the l<strong>and</strong> rights of the tribal <strong>and</strong> indigenous peoples.The non-tribals have also illegally occupied hundreds of thous<strong>and</strong>s of acres of l<strong>and</strong>belonging to tribals by force, allurement <strong>and</strong> acquiring tribal l<strong>and</strong>s in the name of tribalwives after marrying them. The State government of Andhra Pradesh informed the StateAssembly in March 2006 that non-tribal individuals have adopted dubious methods toillegally occupy tribal l<strong>and</strong>s in the names of tribal women after marrying them. As manyas 57,367 acres of l<strong>and</strong> earmarked for the tribals in the Scheduled Areas was under illegaloccupation of non-tribal individuals in West Godavari district. 11 According to the 2004-2005 Annual Report of Ministry of Rural Development of the government of <strong>India</strong>,3,75,164 cases of tribal l<strong>and</strong> alienation have been registered covering 85,52,82 acres ofl<strong>and</strong> in 10 States of Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar (undivided), Gujarat, Karnataka,Madhya Pradesh (undivided), Maharashtra, Orissa, Rajasthan, <strong>and</strong> Tripura as of March2004. Out of these, 1,62,650 cases had been disposed in favour of tribals covering a totalarea of 4,47,314 acres while 1,54,993 cases covering an area of 3,63,493 acres of l<strong>and</strong>had been rejected by the Courts on various grounds. 12The government of <strong>India</strong> has recently announced to establish a L<strong>and</strong> Commission but itsdetails have not been released as yet. There is skepticism because of the past experiences.II. Development <strong>and</strong> victimization of the tribalsIn one h<strong>and</strong>, l<strong>and</strong> rights are provided under the 5 th <strong>and</strong> 6 th Schedules of the Constitutionof <strong>India</strong>. On the other, is the L<strong>and</strong> Acquisition Act of 1894 which prevails on the ground.Under the L<strong>and</strong> Acquisition Act, the government can take away any l<strong>and</strong> in the name of“public purposes”. In <strong>India</strong>, “public purposes” no longer refer to government taking awayl<strong>and</strong>s for the construction of roads, railway lines or government offices etc but has cometo mean the government exercising its sovereign power to take away l<strong>and</strong> of the poor <strong>and</strong>the disadvantaged sections of society for the benefit of the private companies.The tribal <strong>and</strong> indigenous peoples have been the disproportionate victims of displacementdue to socalled development projects such as setting up of industrial projects,construction of dams, mining, etc. <strong>Indigenous</strong>/tribal peoples who constituted 8% of thetotal population of <strong>India</strong> at 1991 census also constituted 55.1% of the total development11. <strong>Tribal</strong> l<strong>and</strong> occupied, The Deccan Chronicle, 22 March 200612. Available at: http://rural.nic.in/annualrep0405/anualreport0405.htm______________________________________________________________________________[A joint submission of IWGIA <strong>and</strong> AITPN for examination of <strong>India</strong>’s human rightsobligations <strong>and</strong> commitments under the UPR of the Human Rights Council]